EY/EuropaBio report highlights need for European governments to ensure that R&D is converted into new businesses, new products and additional jobs
Brussels, 27 March 2012 – National governments in Europe need to do more to ensure that R&D innovation in the biotech industry is translated into new businesses, new products and additional jobs according to a new report launched today by
EY and EuropaBio, “What Europe has to offer biotechnology companies: unraveling the tax, financial and regulatory framework”. The reportfound significant variation in the regulatory and policy environment for biotechnology companies across Europe, which has a significant impact on success and policies across the region. The differences range from basic policies and regulations which encourage financing for start-ups, to the ability to encourage entrepreneurs and attract competent managers.
The report was launched today by EU Commissioner for Research, Innovation and Science, Máire Geoghegan-Quinn, at the European Parliament during the EuropaBio Benefits of Biotechnology event hosted by Member of the European Parliament Francoise Grossetete. Attended by more than 120 people, and opened by Commissioner for Health and Consumer Policy John Dalli, the event focused on the contribution of biotechnology to society’s challenges such as feeding and healing an ageing population, environmental sustainability, economic growth and maintaining Europe as a center of scientific excellence.
Stephan Kuhn, EY EMEIA Tax Leader, said: “A consistent tax and regulatory environment for biotech SMEs across Europe is essential if the industry is to have sustainable growth and remain competitive compared with other regions. This report shows some governments have recognized the importance of policies and programs that foster a strong community of SMEs in biotechnology, such as R&D tax credits or low corporation tax for example, whereas others have not. National governments, together with the EU, need to make sure that the policies are in place to make funding more accessible to SMEs involved in biotechnology”.
The reportsurveyed 16 countries across Europe on the tax, financial and regulatory incentives their governments provide to investors, entrepreneurs and researchers in the bioeconomy, and the challenges facing SMEs. The report compares the tax concessions on offer in each country, financing opportunities for SMEs, and the benefits that can flow from a decision to establish a start-up in a particular location.
Thomas Saylor, EuropaBio Chair of the SME Platform, stated: “This report represents an important contribution to the policy debate over measures that can significantly benefit biotech SMEs in Europe and ensure that Europeans benefit from the biological sciences. There is growing recognition by the European Commission and policy makers throughout Europe of the importance of biotech SMEs to Europe’s future prosperity. As such, the report can play a major role in establishing an agenda for policymakers seeking to ensure an attractive environment for investors and biotech entrepreneurs.”
EuropaBio is the European Association for Bioindustries, bringing together bioscience companies from all fields of research and development, testing, manufacturing and distribution of biotechnology products. It has 54 corporate members, six associate members, two BioRegions and 18 National Biotechnology Associations representing some 1,800 small and medium-sized enterprises.
EY is a global leader in assurance, tax, transaction and advisory services. Worldwide, our 152,000 people are united by our shared values and an unwavering commitment to quality. We make a difference by helping our people, our clients and our wider communities achieve their potential.
EY refers to the global organization of member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients. For more information about our organization, please visit www.ey.com.
This news release has been issued by EYGM Limited, a member of the global EY organization that also does not provide any services to clients.