Tax Services

We’ll help you navigate the global tax landscape

The business and tax landscapes have changed dramatically, and the pace and complexity of change continues to increase. Governments are tempering the need for revenue with increased competition for labor and capital. Tax authorities are adapting their enforcement strategies, focus and policies in response to the changing dynamics of business. Companies are balancing competing priorities, ensuring they maintain compliance while adding value.

We can assist you with these critical issues in today's tax environment, including:


Building a tax manifesto for manufacturing 658K, August 2014



  • Midweek Tax News

    Archives...

    A weekly update on tax matters to 26 May 2015

    Midweek Tax News provides you with a succinct overview of the key tax developments that have occurred each week to allow you to stay up-to-date on tax issues that may have an impact on your business. If you would like to discuss an article in more detail, please speak to the relevant contact listed at the end of this issue or to your usual EY contact.

    The revised discussion draft on BEPS Action 6 (preventing treaty abuse) follows the original report on Action 6, released in September 2014, which proposed changes to the OECD model tax convention to prevent treaty abuse. That report noted that, at a minimum, treaties should include an express statement of their signatories' common intention to eliminate double taxation without creating opportunities for treaty shopping. They should also include one of:

    • A general treaty anti-abuse rule in the form of the principle purpose test (PPT) and a limitations-on-benefits (LOB) rule, or

    • A LOB rule supplemented by anti-conduit rules, or

    • A PPT only

    The first part of the revised discussion draft deals with treaties that will have both a PPT and a LOB rule. It proposes a simplified LOB rule for use in these treaties, which would allow for treaty relief if it could be demonstrated that more than 75% of the beneficial interest in the treaty claimant was directly or indirectly owned by equivalent beneficiaries. Where countries, instead, choose to use a LOB rule supplemented by anti-conduit rules, then it is suggested that the version of the full LOB rule, as set out in the report of September 2014, is used instead of the simplified LOB rule.

    The revised discussion draft makes clear that countries can choose just to adopt a PPT and we understand that this is likely to be the position of the UK unless the other contracting party to a treaty (for example, the US) wishes to use a LOB rule.

    The second part of the revised discussion draft looks at the issues raised in the discussion draft on Action 6 issued in November 2014. This includes support for the conclusions of the 2010 collective investment vehicle (CIV) report concerning the treaty establishment of CIVs. However, the revised draft notes that the implementation of the Treaty Relief and Compliance Enhancement (TRACE) project is important for the practical application of the 2010 CIV report's conclusions. It also notes that further work is needed on issues related to the treaty entitlement of non-CIV funds, which may extend past the September 2015 final report. Among other issues, there is also additional guidance on the application of the PPT rule, including the provision of examples, and guidance on situations where treaty benefits could still be given where they would otherwise be denied under the LOB rule.

    The revised discussion draft also contains new proposals from the US which we report below.

    Comments are requested by 17 June 2015.

    Our global tax alert on the revised discussion draft on BEPS Action 7 (preventing artificial avoidance of permanent establishment status) is also available.

    As we report above and in last week's Midweek Tax News, the OECD has recently released revised discussion drafts on BEPS Action 7 (preventing artificial avoidance of permanent establishment status) and Action 6 (preventing treaty abuse). These revised drafts follow up earlier work by the OECD and narrow down the options and questions that were left outstanding in previous publications.

    On 7 May, the UK general election resulted in a Conservative Government with a small majority. Following the Queen's Speech today, the Chancellor of the Exchequer will deliver his second Budget of the year on 8 July and we expect that a new Finance Bill will follow.

    Register here to join Claire Hooper, Chris Sanger and Sarah Churton for our next Tax Focus web seminar at 10:00 on 2 June when they will discuss the new discussion drafts on treaty abuse and permanent establishments as well as what we can expect in the upcoming Budget and future Finance Bill.

    On 21 May, the Court of Appeal upheld the High Court judgment in the Littlewoods Limited case. This concerned the availability of compound interest on refunds of overpaid VAT, in circumstances where the VAT was paid and collected in breach of EU law. The Court of Appeal found for Littlewoods, ruling that it was entitled to ‘adequate compensation’, which, for Littlewoods, meant compound interest. Given the significance of this judgment and the sums involved, it is highly likely that HMRC will appeal to the Supreme Court.

    Businesses with claims under EU law may wish to consider the implications of the judgment further.

    Scottish Parliament reports on the implementation of the Smith Commission recommendations

    In an interim report, a committee of the Scottish Parliament has concluded that the Smith Commission's recommendations on income tax, VAT, aggregates levy and air passenger duty have been adequately implemented in the draft legislation published by the UK Government. A Scotland Bill is expected to be included in today's Queen's Speech to enact the recommendations for greater devolution of powers included in the report by the Smith Commission in the aftermath of the Scottish independence referendum.

    However, the committee raised questions about the administration of income tax including the definition of residence in Scotland, and whether Scotland could set a 0% rate of income tax. It also noted uncertainty over how VAT receipts would be shared and more general concerns about the overall fiscal framework.

    First-tier Tribunal decides input tax can be recovered where supplier invoices are inadequate

    The First-tier Tribunal has decided a VAT case in favour of the appellant, North & South Groundwork Services Ltd, where HMRC had refused to accept evidence for input tax recovery on the basis that the purchaser of the supplies did not hold valid VAT invoices from sub-contractors. The invoices were rejected as inadequate in terms of the requirements of the VAT Regulations 1995 which require a description sufficient to identify the goods or services supplied and, for each description, the quantity of the goods or the extent of the services supplied.

    In finding against HMRC, the Tribunal observed that the appellant had done its best to supplement whatever shortcomings HMRC had identified in the invoices for which input credit was sought by providing details which included a fuller description of the goods and services supplied. The Tribunal found that the invoices concerned were compliant with the regulations and, furthermore, it found that the additional materials and explanations provided by the appellant in respect of the sub-contracted services were such as to require HMRC to exercise its discretion in favour of allowing the input tax claimed.

    Whilst businesses seeking input tax recovery should ensure that VAT invoices received from suppliers meet all the necessary requirements, the decision may be useful in circumstances where the supply (and VAT charged) is valid but HMRC contends the evidence is insufficient to allow VAT recovery. In these circumstances it may be possible to furnish further information and remind HMRC that it has some discretion to allow input tax.

    New Zealand Budget for 2015 announced

    New Zealand's Minister of Finance, Bill English, delivered his Budget on 21 May and unveiled encouraging economic figures.

    Before the Budget was announced, details were released of a series of property tax compliance measures. These included establishing a ‘bright line’ test that will tax any capital gains made from the sale of an investment property owned for less than two years; introducing transparency measures particularly aimed at non-resident investors; committing to an extra AUS $29mn of funding for the tax authorities to increase its property tax compliance activities; and introducing a withholding tax for non-residents selling residential property. The tax will apply to the full gain at the taxpayers' marginal income tax rate, most likely 33%.

    Please see our global tax alert for more details.

    Study on the application and impact of VAT relief for low value consignments

    The European Commission has published a study (performed by EY) providing an assessment of the application and impact of the VAT exemption for the importation of small consignments, otherwise known as low value consignment relief (LVCR).

    In general, imports of goods in the EU are charged with customs duties and VAT unless they are specifically exempt. LVCR was introduced in the EU in 1983. It allows Member States to relieve imports of goods of a negligible value (not exceeding €22) from VAT and was intended as a method to facilitate cross-border trade by reducing the administrative burden and cost involved for businesses and Member States. In the UK, the LVCR threshold is currently £15.

    The growth in the volume of imported consignments in the EU, which appears to be largely driven by the boom in e-commerce, has put pressure on the existing LVCR. More recently there have been recommendations that LVCR should be abolished and the current Mini One Stop Shop regime should be extended to cover cross-border business-to-consumer sales of goods. The study carried out for the Commission presents an overview of the legal framework and procedures in place in each Member State as regards the implementation of LVCR, as well as an economic analysis of the low value consignments market including an estimate of the potential VAT foregone by tax authorities due to this exemption.

    US court denies claim for tax credit on withholding tax suffered on UK manufactured dividend

    In the case of Lehman Brothers Holdings, a US district court decided that US domestic law applied to deny foreign tax credits on manufactured dividends even though the US domestic law provision applied to dividends rather than manufactured dividends.

    A US corporation borrowed shares from the market and lent them on to its UK subsidiary. When the UK subsidiary received dividends on the shares, it paid corresponding manufactured dividends (‘substitute dividend payments’ in US parlance) on to its US parent, who in turn paid manufactured dividends on to the third parties from whom it had borrowed the shares. Under UK law at the time, the UK subsidiary had to deduct withholding tax from the manufactured dividends that it paid. The US parent claimed tax credits for the withholding tax under the UK/US double tax treaty.

    A US domestic law provision denies tax credits for withholding tax suffered on dividends which were subject to an obligation to make onward payments of manufactured dividends. The taxpayer argued that this provision should not apply to deny tax credits for withholding tax suffered on the manufactured dividends themselves. However, the court interpreted the term ‘dividend’ in the treaty as it was defined for UK rather than US tax purposes as it felt this upheld a consistent interpretation of the treaty. This meant that the manufactured dividends were subject to the domestic law provision as if they were dividends.

    The case highlights limitations to the principle that, unless expressly provided, treaty terms should be interpreted under the domestic law of the jurisdiction applying the treaty.

    Please see our global tax alert for more details.

    Real estate funds: VAT exemption for fund management services

    On 21 May, the Court of Justice of the European Union released the Advocate General's (AG) opinion in the Dutch case of Fiscale Eenheid X NV. The AG opined that funds which invest in real estate can be regarded as a ‘special investment fund’ for the purposes of EU law. As such, the management of these vehicles can qualify for VAT exemption. The AG also found that the meaning of management can cover property and facilities management and it is not limited to investment recommendations and portfolio management only.

    Relevant funds, including pension funds and investment trust companies, as well as their managers and providers, may wish to consider the retrospective and prospective impact of this opinion.

    US proposes new treaty measures to address base erosion

    The US has made a number of suggestions for changes to model tax treaties both independently and in the course of the OECD base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) project.

    As part of the work on BEPS Action 6 (preventing treaty abuse), which is described above, the US proposed two additions to the OECD model tax convention. The first proposal suggests that taxpayers enjoying ‘special tax regimes’ in a contracting state should not benefit from reduced or nil withholding tax under a treaty. For example, where a territory has a special regime for patent royalties, the other territory would retain full taxing rights over patent royalties paid to the first territory. The other US proposal is for treaties to allow for reduced or nil withholding tax rates to be switched off where either territory substantially exempts foreign source income from tax in the future.

    Separately, the US Treasury has published proposed revisions to the US model treaty. These include the ‘special tax regime’ rule noted above, as well as proposals to deal with inversions and permanent establishments. The US Treasury has also suggested a ‘derivative benefits’ test that would allow treaty benefits to apply where the owners of an entity excluded by the limitation-on-benefits rule are themselves entitled to treaty benefits.

    Please see our global tax alert for more details.

    Money laundering directive requires Member States to keep registers of beneficial ownership

    The European Parliament has adopted the European Council's text of the proposed Fourth Money Laundering Directive under which Member States must keep central registers of information on the ultimate beneficial owners of corporate and other legal entities. Member States must ensure that corporate and other legal entities incorporated within their territory are required to obtain and hold adequate, accurate and current information on their beneficial ownership, including the details of the beneficial interests held. The information must be held in a central register in each Member State.

    Details stored in the register must be accessible to competent authorities, financial intelligence units and entities such as banks. Where someone outside these categories can show a ‘legitimate interest’, they will be allowed access to limited information. Member States can also maintain a public register if they wish.

    The directive will enter into force on the twentieth day following its publication in the Official Journal. Member States will then have two years to implement it.

    Other global tax alerts

    Please see links to a selection of our tax alerts in respect of the following developments. Additional articles are available in our global tax alert library.

    The Netherlands: The Ministry of Finance has announced it will follow new OECD guidance on the treatment of termination payments subject to tax treaties.

    Germany: The Court of Justice of the European Union has upheld a previous rule that provided for exit tax payable over ten years on unrealised gains.

    Malaysia: The Ministry of International Trade has released guidance on various tax incentives including those for regional headquarters; operations in less developed areas; and industrial automation.

    Thailand: A Royal Decree has been approved to apply a special 10% corporate tax rate to designated special economic zones.

    Other publications

    Issue 13 of Tax Insights, our magazine for business leaders, concentrates on tax in developing economies with features on the Indonesian middle class and the tax challenges of doing business in emerging markets.

    Please speak to your usual EY contact, or email us at eytaxnews@uk.ey.com, if you would like to receive a copy of our regular indirect tax newsletter, or information about our other publications.

    Further information

    If you would like to discuss any of the articles in this week's edition of Midweek Tax News, please contact the individuals listed below, Claire Hooper (+ 44 20 7951 2486), or your usual EY contact.

    OECD publishes revised discussion draft on base erosion and profit shifting Action 6 (treaty abuse)

    Email Claire Hooper

    + 44 20 7951 1608

    Tax focus web seminar at 10:00 on Tuesday, 2 June on base erosion and profit shifting and the new UK Government's tax plans

    Email Polly Roberts

    + 44 20 7951 4349

    Court of Appeal judgment holds that compound interest is available on overpaid VAT

    Email Mitchell Moss

    + 44 20 7951 2279

    For other queries or comments please email eytaxnews@uk.ey.com.

    Back to the top

  • Operating in a shifting tax landscape

    The global tax landscape continues to change in a dramatic fashion, with near-constant news hitting the headlines regarding shifting tax policy, increasing levels of enforcement and the growing potential of reputational risk.

    Competing priorities

    Multinational companies now have to balance more competing priorities than ever before, ensuring they protect their business by monitoring and responding to changes in policy, legislation and tax enforcement, while at the same time ensuring they not only maintain the highest levels of compliance but also add value from the tax function.

    Governments work to secure each tax dollar they're due

    From a policy perspective, all governments want their country to be viewed as an attractive place to do business, to attract jobs and capital in an increasingly competitive globalized arena.

    At the same time, they want to increase the amount of revenue they bring in. Governments are treading a fine line, constantly assessing how to secure the tax revenues they see as rightly theirs, while at the same time being in direct competition with other nations, making sure they do not scare off mobile capital.

    Tax administrations for their part are adapting their enforcement strategies, focus and policies in response to the changing dynamics of business. They are working to ensure that their resources are being applied to the right issues and taxpayers. They share more leading practices and taxpayer information with their foreign counterparts, to help them collect every dollar due.

    Disputes are on the rise

    The result has been more  frequent, complex and higher value disputes between taxpayers and taxing authorities — a trend that is only increasing as countries collaborate together and as emerging markets gain in stature and influence, taking a more sophisticated approach to taxation. Penalties are becoming more stringent and the threat of reputational risk has risen significantly in recent months.

    We can help you to navigate a route through this complex landscape.

    We can help you monitor and react to quickly-changing tax policy and assess the economic and fiscal impact.

    Where tax policies might create an impediment to your business that is unintended by policy makers, we can help you to collaborate – either solely, or as part of a broader grouping of companies who share a common objective – with government to:

    • Explain the impediment
    • Develop alternative policy choices which are logical and well thought out
    • Model the potential outcomes
    • Deliver an alternative choice to the government in a form with which policy makers can comfortably work

    We also help you address your global tax controversy, enforcement and disclosure needs.

    We focus on pre-filing controversy management to help you properly and consistently file your returns and prepare the relevant back-up documentation.

    Where a controversy has already occurred, our professionals leverage the network's collective knowledge of how tax authorities operate, and increasingly work together, to help resolve difficult or sensitive tax disputes. To ensure that continuous performance improvements are instigated after a controversy, we work with EY's other tax professionals to ensure that similar events are less likely to occur.

    Below you can access our views and analysis of some of the substantial policy and enforcement trends and issues at play today.

    Related content

    TAX-RC-tdr_tl_sm

    Alternative Dispute Resolution: a new chapter emerges

    As tax authorities adapt their enforcement in response to changing business dynamics, so must taxpayers. One key is the knowledge of alternative dispute resolution tools.

  • Seizing the opportunity in Global Compliance and Reporting

    Global Compliance and Reporting (GCR) is at a tipping point, with risks on the rise. Many companies distribute responsibility for GCR processes throughout their organization, creating a patchwork. Local jurisdictions are rewriting regulations, focusing more intently on the collection of tax revenues and sharing more taxpayer information across borders.

    Due to the combination of evolving business models, transforming finance functions and an increasingly complex regulatory landscape, there are new opportunities to better optimize efficiency, control and value, to help mitigate risk and improve performance.

    What is Global Compliance and Reporting?

    GCR comprises the key elements of a company's finance and tax processes that prepare statutory financial and tax filings as required in countries around the world. These duties include:

    • Statutory accounting and reporting
    • Tax accounting and provisions
    • Income tax compliance
    • Indirect tax compliance
    • Governance and control of the above processes

    GCR activities reside in the middle of a broader set of record-to-report (R2R) processes. R2R is the intersection between any company's finance and tax departments and is used to capture, process and store information that is essential to statutory accounting, tax compliance and reporting. Any change to R2R processes, information, finance systems, roles and responsibilities will have a direct impact on GCR processes.

    Helping you meet the new GCR demands

    Fast changing compliance and reporting requirements are more demanding on tax and finance functions today than ever before. So how do you improve control and quality, manage risk, create efficiency and drive value?

    Our market-leading approach combines standard and efficient processes, highly effective tools and an extensive network of local tax and accounting subject matter professionals.

    Related content

  • Building effective supply chains

    As multinational companies seek to reach new markets and compete more effectively in mature markets, they are adapting and differentiating their supply chains. Companies’ operating models need to cater for efficiency and scale in mature markets, while having the flexibility and local ability to support growth in emerging markets. Consequently, driving true shareholder value requires an operating model that combines global and regionally differentiated processes, and integrates these with local striking power and operational excellence.

    Leading companies recognize the need for integrating tax in their business planning and decision processes

    Whether companies seek to enter new markets or drive efficiencies in mature markets, leading companies understand the complexities of the international tax systems. The impact of both direct taxes and indirect taxes needs to be carefully considered and integrated to drive the effectiveness of the operating model while complying with all applicable local and international tax laws and effectively manage all tax risks. Operating model effectiveness is becoming one of the cornerstones of successful competition and differentiation.

    Our approach

    The EY TESCM offering helps ensure you do just that. Our advisory and tax professionals operate as one team to assist our clients with developing and implementing operating model optimization where business needs and requirements are the driver while making sure that tax is an integrated part of the design of the operating model architecture.

  • Managing mobile workforce risk

    In today's globally integrated, tightly regulated and increasingly competitive business environment, one critical success factor stands out: people. It’s no wonder that leading companies are focusing their efforts on:

    • Attracting and retaining the right people
    • Global talent deployment and mobility
    • HR and payroll effectiveness
    • Risk, governance and compliance

    Managing the risks of mobile employees

    While optimizing the competitive advantage of your people has long been a core objective, a more recent set of trends in the tax landscape means that large companies with an internationally mobile workforce are at a higher risk of tax noncompliance and resulting controversy than ever before.

    Fortunately, an increasing number of organizations are currently either planning or embracing a wider process of change for their mobility teams.

    Unintended tax compliance obligations

    These travelers are increasingly creating unintended tax compliance obligations, and the resulting risks are not just personal. They are felt at the corporate level, with the corporate tax function often unaware of the extent of the spreading problem. Tax administrations are becoming increasingly aware of the issue, however, and are very effectively using new technology to identify where a tax obligation has arisen. In a rising tax enforcement landscape, this issue has significant potential to grow.

    Managing these risks should be a burning platform issue for multinational companies.

    Will your tax risks prompt a tax audit?

    What may start as a relatively simple personal income tax compliance issue can quickly create a ripple effect, with risks such as the creation of a permanent establishment, an employment tax audit or the payment of a significant related penalty all occurring at the corporate level.

    Companies, recognizing the spectrum of reputational, personal and financial risks related to tax, are making strong efforts to be compliant. There is an increasing acceptance that such issues are becoming increasingly urgent from both a reputational and a financial perspective.

    How we are helping companies

    Our Human Capital network embeds processes and technology that will help companies to identify and manage short-term business traveler-related risks before they occur. Where controversy has already arisen, our global Tax Controversy network can use our insights into the culture and processes and relationships with each key tax administration to remediate issues. With prior year issues being rapidly unearthed, and with tax administrations focusing on this issue more than ever before, the time to act is now.

    Related content

    EY-Building a new talent management model

    Building a new talent management model

    Businesses are on the brink of a talent crisis. Only a major shift in thinking can help tackle the global talent shortfall.

    TAX-RC-tpc_tl_sm

    Business travelers: assessing tax and immigration risks

    Immigration and tax laws are increasingly aggressive toward business travelers and their companies. Leading companies actively mitigate business travel risks. Do you?


Related content

EY - Our Guide to UK year end tax planning 2014-15

Our Guide to UK year end tax planning 2014/15

Our Guide to UK year end tax planning 2014/15 highlights some of the major issues and areas we think it prudent for taxpayers to consider as the end of the tax year approaches.

EY - A Guide to year end tax planning for non-domiciliaries 2014-15

A Guide to year end tax planning for non-domiciliaries 2014/15

A Guide to year end tax planning for non-domiciliaries 2014/15 is also available.

EY - 2014 Global Transfer Pricing Tax Authority Survey

2014 Global Transfer Pricing Tax Authority Survey

Our survey of 50 jurisdictions across the Americas, Asia-Pacific and Europe, confirms that transfer pricing continues to be front of mind for tax authorities and multinationals.

EY - Global Mobility Effectiveness Survey 2013

Global Mobility Effectiveness Survey 2013

Your talent is in motion. Are you ready to join the conversation?

EY - Tax Transparency

Tax Transparency

The trust an organisation builds with its stakeholders is critical, and tax transparency is a key dimension in building that trust. Find out how we can help.


Contact us

Find your nearest Tax contact:


Law

Find out about our Law services.


 

Connect with us

Stay connected with us through social media, email alerts or webcasts. Or download our EY Insights app for mobile devices.

EY - Tax Insights: Tax policy in developing economies

Tax Insights: Tax policy in developing economies

See the latest tax developments worldwide.

EY - The Finance Act 2014 training modules

The Finance Act 2014 training modules

Watch our Finance Act webcasts for insight and interpretation around the impact of this year's UK Finance Act from some of our leading tax professionals.