M&A across Africa

  • Share

Embarking on any cross border merger or acquisition will raise a host of complex legal, regulatory, labour and tax issues. When it comes to African continent, however, the complexity level can increase significantly because the legal and regulatory framework may not be clear, current or uniformly adhered to. While a stomach for uncertainty is a pre-requisite for investing in most African countries, it is nevertheless possible to identify - and plan around - certain key matters that can assist in rendering an African acquisition tax effective, says Craig Miller, Director, Transactions Tax at EY.

Speaking at EY’s 2013 Africa Tax Conference, Miller said these include planning for withholding taxes, capital gains tax on exit and where possible the use of  interest deduction techniques.

One such technique is “debt push down”, which refers to the process of placing the operating company in the position to deduct from its profits the cost of the acquisition debt. “Because most African countries do not have group relief rules or rules, which provide for tax consolidation or group taxation, debt push down is generally difficult to achieve. Rather, consideration should be given to extraction of value in an efficient manner including minimising any tax upon disposal of the interest in the investee,” Miller said. 

At the very least, said Miller, an investor should aim to be able to extract, at its discretion (and clearly subject to commercial requirements) the amount actually invested free of in-country taxes, which can be high. Failure to plan correctly could conceivably diminish the value of the investment by up to 20%.

Miller adds that given the risk/reward conundrum, which any investor needs to consider when making an investment in an African jurisdiction; it is possible that the tax implications, if careful planning does not take place, adversely impact the economics of actually making the investment. It is crucial that the tax effect of extracting value from the respective African investee jurisdiction is included in the models and proposals presented to boards when contemplating the viability of the foreign investment.

Careful planning is always key to the success of an M&A transaction, but the dynamic nature of the regulatory climate in many African countries calls for a continual monitoring of the chosen structure.

About EY

EY is a global leader in assurance, tax, transaction and advisory services. The insights and quality services we deliver help build trust and confidence in the capital markets and in economies the world over. We develop outstanding leaders who team to deliver on our promises to all of our stakeholders. In so doing, we play a critical role in building a better working world for our people, for our clients and for our communities.

EY refers to the global organization and may refer to one or more of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients. For more information about our organization, please visit ey.com.

This news release has been issued by EYGM Limited, a member of the global EY organization that also does not provide any services to clients.

Following on from EY’s successful integration in 2008 of 87 countries into one area from across Europe, Middle East, India and Africa (EMEIA), the firm has launched its Africa Business Center™ (ABC), which aims to enhance the effective and efficient links between its geographic reach and areas of expertise. The firm enjoys representation in 33 countries across Africa.

Web: www.ey.com/za