AUS-based global wealth management firm was facing a seemingly insurmountable challenge. If its advisors could use real-time portfolio updates to offer their customers products and services that were precisely tailored to their needs, it would transform the business — but this wasn’t possible with their current IT set-up. At the root of the problem was the accuracy, consistency, timeliness and accessibility of data.
Like every wealth management company, the firm has several key applications — covering financial planning, trading, reconciliation, reporting, custody and CRM, among other capabilities — that have been built on a range of platforms or acquired from third-party vendors over a number of years. As a result, these legacy systems often connect and communicate poorly with each other, and with new products and platforms. This makes the firms’s advisors less productive.
“This is an industry-wide problem,” says Sourav Moitra, FSO Consulting Wealth and Asset Management Managing Director, Ernst and Young LLP. “There is no consistency in the data, and the ultimate impact on the client is a poor experience where they can’t even get a straight answer from their advisor about how much their portfolio is worth.”
Moitra explains that an advisor at the wealth management company will frequently find themselves having to enter the same data multiple times in different applications, which is laborious and frustrating. And, because data processing and communications between platforms are slow, they don’t enable advisors to see and act on the latest data in real time. For example, a customer’s net worth may vary depending on which platform the advisor is using, as some will update more quickly than others. And when an account is created for a new customer, the advisor typically can’t see it until the following day. This is frustrating for both parties.
As a result of these data-related issues, the wealth manager was losing advisors — and in turn, those advisors’ clients and their associated assets under management. Moreover, it couldn’t be as nimble as competitors in offering clients improved products or services. The company knew that it urgently needed to modernize its data integration architecture to be agile; however, its inflexible architecture was expensive to upgrade and time-consuming to modernize.