5 minute read 25 Feb 2021
Hand auf Tisch

Ready for IBOR transition – with a focus on tech execution and testing

By Eveline Hunziker

Partner, IBOR Country Leader in Financial Services | EY Switzerland

More than 10 years of experience in investment banking & treasury with secondments at FINMA and in New York. Highly skilled at leading large scale, complex projects with global teams.

5 minute read 25 Feb 2021

Show resources

  • EY IBOR Transition Readiness Banking Survey infographic (pdf)

    Download 547 KB

Banks have grasped the complexity of IBOR transition for IT and are shifting their focus to the extent and scale of front-to-back testing.

In brief

  • Banks are making progress with IBOR transition but must keep up the pace to be ready by year-end.
  • As technology permeates all work streams, strong program leadership is essential to ensure a smooth transition.
  • FINMA has defined a transition roadmap with staggered deadlines to for banks in Switzerland.

EY’s IBOR Transition Readiness Banking Survey offers insights into how the global banking community is preparing for the upcoming phase-out. As a major financial hub, Switzerland is significantly affected. Where does the Swiss financial sector stand? What are the main challenges? And what concrete steps will help financial institutions move forward – fast?

As they navigate tight deadlines and a shortage of resources, banks in Switzerland should focus on technology, client outreach and contract repapering to propel them toward IBOR preparedness by the end of the year.

  • Survey methodology

    EY interviewed IBOR program leads at 28 banks, with a multiregional footprint, between November 2020 and January 2021 as part of the third annual survey of banks’ readiness for the IBOR transition. Those surveyed were from both Global Systemically Important Banks (G-SIBs) and local banks operating in the UK, EMEIA and the US.

Show resources

  • Download the IBOR Transition Readiness Banking Survey infographic

Where does the Swiss financial sector stand on the IBOR transformation journey?

FINMA has been actively guiding the IBOR transition process for supervised institutions. For 2020, FINMA already made clear its expectations regarding CHF LIBOR cash products, including the aim of substantially reducing CHF LIBOR contracts without robust fallbacks. Although guidance was targeted at the 26 most affected institutions, FINMA recommends all banks to take note.

FINMA’s LIBOR transition roadmap, issued in December 2020, sets out in the detail the steps that supervised institutions and market participants should take to enable a smooth and timely transition. Deadlines are staggered over the course of 2021 to encourage effective use of the remaining time until the end of 2021. Following FINMA’s recommendations enables relevant parties to safeguard operational readiness for discontinuation of LIBOR in CHF, EUR, GBP and JPY (in all tenors), and in USD (in the 1W and 2M tenors) across all product types.

FINMA will continue to closely monitor the development of the contract volume linked to LIBOR in 2021 and will take institution-specific measures to limit the risks of inadequate preparation where necessary.

What are the biggest issues, risks and challenges?

Unless managed effectively and in a timely manner, discontinuation of the LIBOR could pose a major operational risk for supervised institutions. FINMA’s main concerns for banks in Switzerland are operational readiness, legal risks and valuation risks.

FINMA estimates that even small to medium banks (supervisory category 3 to 5) face complex updates in response to the LIBOR phase-out. For banks of this size, LIBOR feeds on average into two to three internal systems, four to five outsourced systems and 11 reporting areas relying on accurate rates. Without targeted action, IT landscapes – from core banking systems and trading platforms to accounting software – will struggle to cope with alternative reference rates and fallbacks. As a result, banks could struggle post transition to deliver relevant reporting accurately and on time.

With technology key to the transition, it’s no surprise that FINMA is calling for early action. The regulator has recommended a deadline of 30 June 2021 for system and process changes. A year ago, the challenges were around which systems would be impacted and managing that complexity. This year, it is scale rather than complexity that is now seen as the biggest risk. Around half of EY’s survey respondents flagged the scale and extent of front-to-back testing as a high or very high risk. Against this background, there’s no time to lose in defining strategy, leadership and actions.

Client outreach still remains sporadic and, according to EY’s global survey, the current rate is running behind expectations. Based on FINMA’s timetable of actions, most Swiss banks should by now have ceased concluding new transactions based on CHF or EUR LIBOR that mature after end-2021 (without robust fallback clauses), and – where possible – GBP, JPY or USD LIBOR. Banks should be ready to grant loans that are not based on CHF, EUR, GBP, JPY or USD LIBOR. Swiss banks have responded positively, with many introducing mortgages based on the Swiss Average Rate Overnight (SARON) for the first time in 2020.

Considerations and recommendations

As FINMA emphasizes in its Guidance 10/2020, the time to act is now. Swiss banks should focus their transition efforts on three core work streams – technology, client outreach and contract repapering – to ensure readiness by the end of 2021.

  • Technology

    • Many banks have legacy platforms and systems that are struggling to cope and expensive to run and maintain. IBOR transition provides an opportunity to accelerate banks’ digital agenda – to start greenfield operations or to digitize contracts in order to become more efficient.
    • Less than a third of firms polled have fully established program test leadership, and even fewer (18%) had defined an end-to-end test strategy. These are critical success factors that need to be addressed as soon as possible.
  • Client outreach

    • EY’s survey participants generally agree that technology is helpful in managing conduct risk. At the same time, they recognize the challenges that arise from multiple CRM systems. We see active transition of portfolios as the best way to ensure transition risk is appropriately managed.
    • Respondents with large portfolios have identified third parties to support the execution of the transition. This is a pragmatic and cost-efficient way to manage the peak.
  • Contract repapering

    • If they have not yet signed the IDSA 2020 IBOR Fallbacks Protocol, Swiss banks should (in most cases) strive to do so as soon as possible. Firms that leverage industry standard templates to draft their transition legal documentation can help alleviate pressure on stretched in-house legal resources.
    • Firms may also consider seconding in-house lawyers to support with the heavy due diligence workload, at least during this intense phase of transition.

Summary

For many banks, 2021 marks the home straight in an endurance race toward IBOR preparedness. The adoption of alternative rates in new products is under way but a lot of work remains to be done. Of all the work streams, tech topics seem to permeate the IBOR phase-out most – from client outreach to core banking systems. EY’s survey of IBOR program leads found that half of banks felt there was a high or very high risk from the extent and scale of front-to-back testing required. Strong program leadership is essential to ensure a smooth transition.

About this article

By Eveline Hunziker

Partner, IBOR Country Leader in Financial Services | EY Switzerland

More than 10 years of experience in investment banking & treasury with secondments at FINMA and in New York. Highly skilled at leading large scale, complex projects with global teams.