While the tax rate of TCS is nominal, making changes in IT system, putting in place a robust framework for TCS compliance and reporting can be an arduous task. One of the biggest dilemmas business organizations are facing is whether to discharge TCS on accrual basis or on receipt basis. This is because legislators have deviated from the earlier TCS provisions which required compliance by sellers on earlier of receipt of consideration and accrual in the books, whereas the new TCS provisions, covering sale of goods, require the sellers to pay TCS on receipt of sale consideration. Therefore, organizations are busy updating their accounting packages and IT systems to ensure appropriate TCS levy on invoices, even though charging TCS on invoices is not specifically required by law.
In doing so, organizations would be looking to set up a robust system to timely track collections from customers (including advances) for accurate liability determination. Likewise, maintaining a track of TCS collected by suppliers on the procurement side would be an added task while determining the total tax credit available for the year.
Undertaking the required validations, determining TCS liability, ensuring accurate and timely compliances, maintaining reconciliations and being audit-ready would be a humongous exercise, especially for large entities having high volume of transactions on a single day. Therefore, many organizations, unfazed by the nominal rate of TCS, are considering the need to introduce technology in TCS compliance. The recent EY-SAP survey also revealed that almost 65% of respondents recognized the need for digital intervention to automate their TCS compliance and reporting lifecycle, to keep pace with the government’s increasing use of data analytics and Intelligent Automation.
The need for maintaining reconciliations across General Ledgers financial statements, tax audit reporting as well as GST filings cannot be undermined considering regulators’ intent of widening and deepening the tax net. Thanks to the extensive use of technology by the tax administration, one can expect to receive notices to reconcile purchase and sales data as per Form 26AS, or TCS returns with financials statements and GST filings during assessments. Use of rule-based Artificial Intelligence and data analytics might make it effortless for authorities to point out inconsistencies in data collated from multiple sources.
India Inc. now needs to be prepared to manage its working capital for this 0.1% tax, which some may argue, would increase the compliance burden. However, the justifying flipside would be the fact that only more than 1% people are paying taxes.
The article has been co-authored by Manoj Rathi, Tax Director with EY India.