- Leverage limits imposed by NCAs
When deciding to impose leverage limits, NCAs should consider
I. risks posed by funds according to their type and risk profile as defined by the risk assessment
II. risks posed by common exposure. Where a group of funds of the same type and similar risk profiles may collectively pose leverage-related systemic risks, NCAs should apply similar limits to all funds in that group
NCA should carefully implement leverage limits, both in terms of timing and phasing in and out. Limits should be:
I. maintained as long as the risks do not decrease
II. released when the change in market conditions or fund behaviour stop being procyclical, when measures have been implemented to limit the build-up of risks
III. implemented progressively in a way which avoids procyclicality
IV. cyclical limits, where appropriate, in order to dampen the build-up and materialisation of risks in the upswing and downswing of the financial cycle
When setting the level of leverage limits, NCAs should assess their effectiveness in addressing the relevant systemic risks
I. when risks are directly related to size, leverage limits should reduce the risks accordingly
II. when risks are partially related to size and leverage limits are not sufficient, NCAs should consider imposing other restrictions on investment policy, redemption policy or risk policy
III. when leverage limits may temporarily result in an increase of risks, NCAs should impose restrictions on the proportion of certain assets to avoid sales of lower risk assets to meet the new requirement. In order to address liquidity mismatches, NCAs should impose a reduction of the frequency of redemptions or impose notice periods
NCAs should evaluate the efficiency of leverage limits by taking into consideration the
I. proportionality of the limits to ensure that the sector remains able to provide valuable services to the economy
II. robustness to gaming and arbitrage