Press release

12 Aug 2020 London, GB

UK productivity saw record deterioration in Q2 – EY ITEM Club comments

UK productivity had a record fall in Q2 as economic activity saw record contraction and fell significantly more than hours worked.

Press contact

Annabel Banks

EY UK&I Media Relations Manager

A highly experienced communications professional with cross-sector experience in media relations having worked with global brands spanning elite professional services firms to digital start-ups.

Related topics Growth COVID-19
  • UK productivity had a record fall in Q2 as economic activity saw record contraction and fell significantly more than hours worked
  • The impact of COVID-19 magnified existing concerns about the UK’s productivity performance which has been weak for some time
  • Output per hour fell 2.5% quarter-on-quarter and was down 3.0% year-on-year in Q2. Productivity had previously relapsed in the first quarter having shown some much-needed improvement over the second half of 2019
  • Output per worker was down 19.9% quarter-on-quarter and 22.0% year-on-year in the second quarter
  • A risk is that the significant impact of COVID-19 on the UK economy over the first half of 2020 has a lasting negative impact on productivity and UK growth potential
  • Business investment has been pared back and there is the risk – even following the easing of lockdown restrictions – that companies remain cautious for an extended period in new investments with negative implications for productivity
  • Part of the UK’s recent poor labour productivity performance has been that – where possible – companies preferred to take on labour rather than commit to costly and difficult-to-reverse investment, given an uncertain economic and political outlook over the last few years
  • There are a number of other factors that may have negatively affected productivity. Many of the new jobs that have been created in recent years have been in less-skilled, low-paid sectors where productivity is limited. Some have also argued that the UK has been poor at transferring technology and know-how from the most productive companies to others

Howard Archer, chief economic advisor to the EY ITEM Club, comments:

“UK productivity – measured in terms of output per hour worked – saw a record decline in the second quarter as it fell 2.5% quarter-on-quarter, according to a “flash” estimate from the Office for National Statistics (ONS).

“Output per hour worked fell 2.5% quarter-on-quarter in the second quarter of 2020 as gross value added (GVA) contracted a record 20.4% while hours worked declined 18.4%.

“Every sector in the UK economy saw a quarter-on-quarter fall in output per hour in the second quarter. Construction saw by far the largest fall of 11.4%, followed by services (2.5%) non-manufacturing production (0.5%) and manufacturing (0.3%).

“However, the ONS reported that the results on a sector level mask much larger changes in the constituent industries. By far the most significant fall in output per hour was in the hotels and catering industry. Productivity in this industry decreased by 74.7%. The second largest fall was in transport equipment manufacturing, which fell by 34.4%.

“Output per hour worked was down 3.0% year-on-year in the second quarter. The ONS has said that quarterly movements in productivity measures can be erratic so year-on-year rates gives a better indication of trend – although it did observe that “the immediate nature of change has led to us highlighting the comparison with the previous quarter in this flash estimate.” This followed a decline in output per hour worked of 1.3% quarter-on-quarter and 0.6% year-on-year in the first quarter.

“Output per hour worked had previously edged up just 0.1% overall in 2019 after a small gain of 0.5% in 2018. There had been modest improvement in productivity over the second half of 2019 after weakness over the first half of the year and the second half of 2018. Output per hour worked had risen 0.2% quarter-on-quarter in the fourth quarter of 2019 following a gain of 0.5% quarter-on-quarter in the third quarter. It had previously been flat quarter-on-quarter in the second quarter and fallen 0.4% quarter-on-quarter in the first quarter. Year-on-year growth in output per hour was limited to just 0.4% in the fourth quarter of 2019, as it had been in the third quarter. While slight, these were the equal strongest annual gains since the second quarter of 2018. Prior to the third quarter of 2019, output per hour had fallen year-on-year for four successive quarters, including a drop of 0.4% in the second quarter of 2019, which had been the largest annual decline since the second quarter of 2014.”

Output per worker saw significant fall reflecting impact of furlough scheme

Howard Arched continues: “Output per worker was down a record 19.9% quarter-on-quarter and 22.0% year-on-year in the second quarter. This followed a decline of 2.8% quarter-on-quarter and 3.1% year-on-year in the first quarter. The ONS reported that “this is steeper than that observed for output per hour because of the impact of the furlough scheme that retains employees as workers even though they work zero hours.” The total number of workers fell by 0.7% in the second quarter, which is a much smaller movement than would be expected in response to a 20.4% fall in GVA.”

UK has a catching up to do on productivity

Howard Archer adds: “The impact of COVID-19 magnified existing concerns around the UK’s productivity performance, which has been weak for some time. Indeed, the flat overall productivity performance over 2019 after an underwhelming 2018 extends the UK’s overall poor productivity record since the 2008/9 recession.”

Number of factors may have held back UK productivity

Howard Archer continues: “The UK’s “productivity puzzle” is a source of much debate and analysis. Part of the UK’s recent poor labour productivity performance has undoubtedly been that low wage growth has increased the attractiveness of employment for companies. This helped employment to hold up well during the 2008/9 downturn and to pick up as growth returned.

“It also appears that many companies took on labour rather than committing to costly and difficult-to-reverse investment in recent years, given the uncertain economic and political outlook. The low cost and flexibility of labour relative to capital has certainly supported employment over investment.

“Extended uncertainties over Brexit caused companies to limit their investment with implications for productivity. Significantly, business investment has been low since the second half of 2017 and it rose just 0.8% in 2019 after contraction of 1.5% in 2018. Business investment fell 0.3% quarter-on-quarter in the first quarter of 2020 and then fell a record 31.4% quarter-on-quarter in the second quarter. This meant that business investment in the second quarter of 2020 was 32.3% below its peak level in the fourth quarter of 2017.

“There are a number of structural factors that may have negatively affected productivity.

“Many of the new jobs that have been created in recent years are in less-skilled, low-paid sectors where productivity is limited. A report by the NIESR and the Joseph Rowntree Foundation in 2018 concluded that productivity is particularly poor in low-paid jobs in the UK compared with other major economies, lagging up to 20-30% behind similar roles in Germany, France and the US.

“Similarly, ONS analysis has concluded that much of the slowdown in UK productivity has been due to the changing composition of the UK economy with workers moving from more (such as mining) to less efficient sectors (food & catering). Nevertheless, the ONS also observed that there had been a slowdown in productivity growth in a number of sectors, including financial services, telecommunications and manufacturing.

“The Bank of England’s chief economist has also argued that the UK’s productivity problem has been influenced by an unusually wide gap between Britain's most productive firms and the much longer tail of its least productive companies. He has suggested this is a consequence of a diffusion problem with the UK relatively poor at transferring technology and know-how.

“In addition, there has been concern about the impact of so-called “zombie” companies that have been helped to stay alive through very low interest rates.”

Outlook

Howard Archer comments: “The risk is that COVID-19’s impact on the UK economy over the first half of 2020 has a lasting negative impact on productivity and UK growth potential. In particular, business investment has been pared back and there is the risk that companies will be very cautious for an extended period in new investments.”