EY refers to the global organization, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients.
How EY can help
-
Americas and US Tax Policy at Ernst & Young LLP is a one-stop resource for insights on national and state tax reform, tax policy, regulatory changes and legislation.
Read more
Some of the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022’s tax components could affect corporate income taxes imposed by state and local governments. When certain tax changes under the IRA will affect state income taxes generally depends on how each state conforms to the Internal Revenue Code.
While most states do not follow federal minimum tax regimes, state income tax conformity to the 15% corporate alternative minimum tax (CAMT) based on adjusted financial statement income (AFSI) could be an issue in the few states that have enacted a corporate AMT that relies on IRC Section 55. It is unclear how existing state conformity statutes intersect with the significant changes under the Act to IRC Sections 55-59.
A handful of states impose corporate minimum taxes that are based on capital stock or are otherwise not based on the federal tax computed under IRC Section 55, such that the CAMT would not impact those state taxes.
State adoption of federal corporate AMT regimes historically has raised complexities. The effects of the CAMT will arise not only from how the states currently conform to federal tax law, but also from how state lawmakers modify state tax laws in response to federal changes. Some states could choose to adopt the CAMT or implement their own tax reforms. Similarly, state lawmakers could seek additional funding for their taxing authorities, mirroring the Internal Revenue Service enforcement funding provided by the Act.