Geostrategic Shifts in 2026: Sustainability Pressures Reshaping Global Trade
The beginning of 2026 has seen the 56th Annual Meeting of the World Economic Forum (WEF), the WEF Global Risks Report 2026, and the EY geostrategic outlook report published. These reports and conferences collectively shared a common theme, signalling a fundamental shift in the geopolitical, environmental and economic landscape shaping global trade. Against rising fragmentation, climate driven resource constraints and more interventionist industrial policies, companies face growing complexity in aligning tax, trade and sustainability strategy. The EY geostrategic outlook report raising the need for integrated governance models spanning tax, sustainability, technology and risk to better anticipate political shifts and regulatory change.
A central theme is the intensifying sustainability agenda. The WEF’s agenda for the 56th Annual Meeting in Davos in January 2026 included a priority of building prosperity within planetary boundaries. The thematic is reinforced by the WEF risk findings, where extreme weather ranks as the third most likely source of global crisis and long term risks cluster heavily around environmental degradation. Water scarcity and critical minerals competition are emerging as pressure points driving new regulations, sustainability linked taxes, incentives for domestic production and tighter permitting, particularly for water intensive sectors such as AI data centres and semiconductor manufacturing.
The Davos discussions point to mounting structural volatility in global supply chains, driven by geopolitical fragmentation, technological acceleration and climate pressures, with shipping costs and trade flows heavily disrupted in 2025. This environment demands greater agility and transformation, with resilience now viewed as one of the key growth drivers. Embedding sustainability, digital innovation and collaborative models to build flexible, future ready supply networks were among the outcomes frequently voiced at Davos.
What does it mean
- Companies should prepare for increasingly sustainability driven border measures, shifting incentive regimes, and rising compliance expectations.
- Companies should redesign supply networks to reduce structural volatility, embedding sustainability into core supply chain decision making to enhance resilience and competitiveness.
- Companies should accelerate digital transformation to improve agility, foresight, and ecosystem coordination, while leveraging incentives that support innovation, new business models, and stronger sustainability outcomes.