How can workers find their place in the green economy?

Authors
George Atalla

EY Global Government & Public Sector Leader

Working with governments to address complex issues and build a better working world.

Gianluca Di Pasquale

EY Global Green Economies & Infrastructure Leader and Future Cities Co-Leader

Start-upper and a social entrepreneur. Business mentor. Interested in working for big things that will shape the future.

Contributors
15 minute read 8 Nov 2023

Show resources

The push toward a fossil-free and just and fair transition will shape a new era of economic growth and a new jobs landscape.

This is part of a trilogy of articles exploring the role of governments in accelerating a green and just transition.

Download the eBook

In brief

  • Green climate action will have a long-term positive impact on global growth, as governments deliver on their commitments.
  • Total employment will increase, but regions that are most dependent on the fossil fuel sector will take longer to see the benefits of an uptick in green jobs.
  • Government need to make investments, prepare for a new employment ecosystem and provide training through capacity building and greater collaboration.

Governments must be poised to take a proactive role in ensuring a just green transition and a new era of jobs and growth. The importance of green jobs will increase, not only as a component of labor input, but also as a crucial factor for accomplishing the green transition process. This isn’t just about what jobs will disappear and which will be created. There are more fundamental issues at play. The future sustainability of the labor market will be crucial to delivering a just transition for all of society. In a dynamic framework where time is a critical variable, any shortages of human capital will delay the green transition process.

The job market already is being transformed from the bottom up: 65% of employees are more likely to work for companies with environmental policies in line with their own values. Similarly, two-thirds of workers are expressing a desire to learn green skills to become more valuable in the workplace of the future.1

These trends are even stronger when considering the values of generations about to enter the workforce: 88% of business school students consider environmental issues in business a top priority for their future careers. Moreover, two-thirds of students are looking for solutions to integrate sustainability into their future occupations.2

The new green jobs that will make the difference in reaching net-zero environmental ambitions will require a different skillset than those lost in fossil fuel-dependent industries. That’s why it is important that governments focus on the sectors that will create employment opportunities and anticipate the trends that will shape the way people will work in the coming decades.
 

Engineer walking towards wind turbine
(Chapter breaker)
1

Chapter 1

The great decoupling of emissions and growth

Green climate action will raise global GDP per capita while reducing total energy consumption and CO2 emissions in the long run.

As global governments commit to a phased transition away from fossil fuels into renewable energy, they will need to understand how this new era will shape economic growth, how it will differ from the fossil-fuel age and how they can develop policies and plans to fully support and harness new power sources for the betterment of all.

To better understand what economic growth will look like in the coming years and how it might differ across regional economies, we collaborated with Politecnico di Milano to model the potential value and impacts of the green transition process. Specifically, we focused on what governments’ National Determined Contributions (NDCs) to meet the target of 1.5 degrees Celsius set by the UN 2015 Paris Agreement will mean for gross domestic product (GDP) and jobs growth over the next three decades.

To do this, we modeled two scenarios plus a baseline scenario:

  1. The first scenario is called low-carbon economy (LCE). This scenario models GDP based on Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) policy announcements, including the COP27 pledges. 
  2. The second scenario is low-carbon economy plus (LCE+), which provides a feasible pathway to minimize carbon emissions beyond political pledges. It is based on reducing emissions by adopting the optimum, least-emissions pathway within key industry sectors and available technologies. 
  3. The third baseline scenario depicts no policy implementation or technological changes, with energy demand driven only by economic growth until 2050.
  • More detail on each scenario

    Low-carbon economy scenario

    This scenario is based on the latest policy announcements (as of 2022) and declared pledges (after the UN COP27 conference) by governments, including energy and climate-related policies credibly expected to enter into force in the next years. The credibility threshold is defined by the existence of a specific timeline for such policies and their presence in a country’s (or region’s) legislative track ⏤ such as the proposed “Fit for 55” EU package. General long-term targets or statements not yet underpinned by precise practical implementation plans are not included.

    Low-carbon economy-plus scenario

    The LCE+ scenario provides a technologically feasible pathway that minimizes carbon emissions into the atmosphere while providing the costs of the technologies in each region and considering the relative competitiveness of various energy transition solutions. The technical credibility threshold is defined by the commercial readiness of technologies in terms of production and commercialization. Examples of credible technical threshold are solar power and energy storage.3 On the other hand, it is unlikely that technologies like nuclear fusion or carbon sequestration from the air will deliver relevant emission reductions unless a significant technological breakthrough is achieved in the next decade. Such technologies are not included in the LCE+ scenario.

    A baseline scenario was developed for comparative purposes. This scenario depicts a pathway in which none of the NDC stated policies are implemented and current technological mixes are kept unchanged up to 2050 while the energy demand is driven only by economic growth.

     

  • Open image description#Close image description

    A set of three line charts. Each chart has purple, blue and green lines illustrating the impact on the economy (GDP%), total final energy consumption (%) and CO2 emissions (%) under the baseline, LCE and LCE+ scenarios, respectively, from 2020 to 2050. It illustrates a significant reduction in CO2 emissions (%) in LCE+ when compared to the LCE scenario.

We predict the first long-term decoupling of GDP from energy consumption — a landmark achievement. Both LCE and LCE+ scenarios will result in a persistent increase of global GDP per capita by 4.7% and 5.2%, respectively, versus the baseline scenario. While global GDP is growing, the trend in total energy consumption from 2040 to 2050 will decrease, thanks to intense policy action in Western countries (the EU27, the UK and the US in particular). This trend is counterbalanced in the 2040 to 2050 decade by growing energy demand in emerging economies.

Total final energy consumption and CO2 emission trends highlight a second long-term decoupling: in the LCE and LCE+ scenarios, the CO2 emission trend in the baseline scenario is reversed. CO2 emissions fall, even after the rebound of energy consumption in the 2040 to 2050 decade because the strong penetration of renewable energy solutions allows higher energy consumption without the CO2 emissions associated with fossil fuels.

In fact, according to the modeling, total energy consumption will rise globally by 23% in 2050 vs. 2020 levels. This growth is led by a rising population and standards of living in emerging economies, especially in India, but is not projected to result in a global increase in CO2 emissions due to technological advances in sustainable energy generation. 

  • Open image description#Close image description

    A stacked column chart with two bars. The bars show total energy consumption in 2020 and 2050, respectively, under the LCE scenario across different regions. The chart illustrates that while energy consumption will reduce in some regions like the US, Australia and EU27+UK, the overall consumption will increase due to the increase across the remaining regions. China, India and Africa are expected to be the top consumers of energy in 2050.

Such transformations will also herald fundamental changes in the global job market, creating new opportunities and positions in the green economy but also making roles in fossil-based industries and dependent sectors redundant.

Asian woman examining bok choy in greenhouse hydroponic vertical farm
(Chapter breaker)
2

Chapter 2

How global employment will evolve in the green growth era

The net effect on employment triggered by the green transition is positive but will harshen inequalities among regions.

Just as economic growth will be reshaped by decoupling from fossil fuel power, so will the jobs market. Occupations that are specifically tied to fossil fuel production may be lost. For example, more than 18 million jobs currently related to oil, gas and coal globally4 may be at risk. Phasing out fossil fuels will affect other workers along the value chain and impact local economies as well.

For governments, a critical part of ensuring a just transition will be balancing the social benefits and risks of reducing fossil fuel jobs while replacing them with green employment. They will have to anticipate what the new labor market will look like — specifically how many new jobs will be created, what skills levels will be needed to fulfill them, where those jobs most likely will be located and whether those currently working in fossil fuel sectors can easily transition into the new green economy. Shalinder Bakshi, EY Global People Advisory Services Leader, Government & Infrastructure said, “To prepare for a new era of green jobs and growth, governments will need to create a positive impact not just in terms of employment, but also equity and inclusiveness.”

The transition is already taking place in some parts of the energy sector. Major oil and gas companies are investing heavily in utility, electricity generation and offshore wind. Both oil and utility providers are seeking to build EV infrastructure. Even mining companies will continue to offer employment opportunities as they transition out of coal into the minerals needed to run many renewable technologies. Upskilling and re-skilling will become key drivers for organizations as they transform their business models, ensuring they keep and attract the right people with green skills to deliver.

None of this transition will be simple — there will be few like-for-like job opportunities and many of the new jobs created will be in different locations and require different skillsets. 

To prepare for a new era of green jobs and growth, governments will need to create a positive impact not just in terms of employment, but also equity and inclusiveness.
Shalinder Bakshi
EY Global People Advisory Services Leader, Government & Infrastructure

Fewer green jobs will be created within eco-industries5 (46 million under the LCE and LCE+ scenarios) than fossil fuel jobs lost because of the higher productivity gains provided by renewable energies (73 million under the LCE scenario). However, millions of new jobs will be created along the entire value chains tied to these core green economy sectors. We call them “other green jobs.” These include manufacturing, transport, construction and other services.

  • Open image description#Close image description

    A set of two staked column charts, each with three bars. The graphs represent employment deviation in LCE and LCE+ scenarios from the baseline over the years 2030, 2040, and 2050. The chart illustrates that green jobs and other-green jobs will rapidly grow under both scenarios while gray jobs will decline. There will be a higher decline in gray jobs across all years in LCE+ compared to the LCE scenario.

Green jobs

46m

Green jobs will be generated globally under LCE and LCE+ scenarios

Gray jobs

73m

Gray jobs will be lost under the LCE scenario

  • Open image description#Close image description

    A line chart. The orange and green lines show the total employment deviation from baseline under the LCE and LCE+ scenarios, respectively, from 2020 to 2050. The net impact on jobs is positive under both scenarios. By 2050, net job generation will be 151 million under the LCE and 120 million jobs under the LCE+ scenarios.

The net effect on employment is, however, positive; counting the “other green jobs,” net job generation will be 151 million more jobs created under LCE and 120 million jobs under LCE+. (The difference is mainly due to a higher increase in productivity in the LCE+ scenario). However, these changes won't play out uniformly across the world. In fact, the transition will harshen inequalities amongst some regions. When looking at how the employment landscape will change, we were able to identify three key clusters.

The first cluster is composed of the EU27, the UK, China and — to a lesser degree — the US. Here we have regions where a combination of a shrinking labor force (mainly due to demographic patterns) will intersect with higher demand for new green jobs and skills. Countries in this cluster are likely to have more jobs than internal applicants. This means that part of the green job requirement might not be internally met and would have to be attracted from other regions.

  • Open image description#Close image description

    A set of three line charts. The charts represent the employment landscape in first cluster countries, i.e., EU27+UK, China and the US. The EU27+UK and China charts have red, orange and green lines representing employment rate under the baseline, LCE and LCE+ scenarios, respectively, from 2020 to 2050. The US chart has red and green lines representing employment rate under the baseline and LCE+ scenarios, respectively, from 2020 to 2050. There is also a dotted line at 100 that represents the condition of “full employment.” Countries in this cluster are likely to have more jobs than internal applicants and would need to attract talent from other regions.

The second cluster is composed of the Middle East and — to a lesser degree — Australia. These seem to be the most negatively affected regions due to their heavy specialization in fossil fuel supply chain and trade. For example, oil rents — the difference between the value of crude oil production at regional prices and total costs of production — constitute over 11% of GDP in Middle East and North African (MENA) countries.6 Though this share has fallen significantly in the last decade (it was over 29% in 2011), it is still far above the global average of 1%. Due to the transition, socio-economic sustainability risks will likely increase as the employment rate drops.

  • Open image description#Close image description

    A set of two line charts. The charts represent the employment landscape in second cluster countries, i.e., the Middle East and Australia, placed next to one another. Each chart has orange, red and green lines illustrating employment rate under the baseline, LCE and LCE+ scenarios, respectively, from 2020 to 2050. There is also a dotted line at 100 that represents the condition of “full employment.” Countries in this cluster will likely be the most negatively affected due to their heavy specialization in the fossil fuel supply chain and trade.

The third cluster encompasses India, Southeast Asia and Africa. India and Southeast Asia will almost maintain their employment levels up to 2040 and will improve them in the 2040-2050 decade. Africa, however, is likely to experience a significant initial drop until 2035. In Africa and India, rather than transition-related investments, a significant component of new job creation after 2035 will be due to trade multipliers activated by growth demand in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries. For example, hydrogen generation in Africa could help the region become a global player through green hydrogen exports, potentially activating €1 trillion of investments.7 And in the mining sector, 58% of the international supply of cobalt — a critical raw material used as a component of cathodes in batteries and as a catalyst in fuel cells — comes from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC).8

  • Open image description#Close image description

    A set of three line charts. The charts represent the employment landscape in second cluster countries, i.e., Africa, India and Southeast Asia. The Africa chart has red, orange and green lines illustrating employment rate under the baseline, LCE and LCE+ scenarios, respectively, from 2020 to 2050. The India and Southeast Asia charts have red and green lines illustrating employment rate under the baseline and LCE+ scenarios, respectively, from 2020 to 2050. There is also a dotted line at 100 that represents the condition of “full employment.” Until 2040, India and Southeast Asia are projected to sustain their employment levels and subsequently enhance them during 2040-2050. On the other hand, Africa is expected to encounter a notable decline in employment in the early years leading up to 2035.

Green jobs will be crucial in accompanying the transition process even more than support of overall labor input. In fact, a shortage of skilled labor and changing demographic patterns of the working age population associated with decoupling from fossil fuels could lead to stability issues in different regions either by overheating the labor market or increasing social unsustainability.

Team learning together about sustainable energy
(Chapter breaker)
3

Chapter 3

What governments can do to prepare for the green jobs transition

Capacity building and public-private collaboration are key to reshaping the employment ecosystem.

Change is coming at pace in the world of work, driven by an increased need for green jobs. “Halving emissions by 2030 is not just a goal; it’s an economic necessity to build and sustain equitable growth,” says Amy Brachio, EY Global Vice Chair - Sustainability. “Climate action will transform our economies through the growth and development of green jobs required to scale the services and solutions needed for a net zero economy. Companies should start today by investing in the training of a skilled workforce capable of tackling the challenges and opportunities of energy transition.”

As economies of scale in the energy, manufacturing and construction sectors begin to favor green products and solutions, the pace will quicken even more rapidly. Government and business must ask: how can we best prepare now for the change we know is coming? 

Climate action will transform our economies through the growth and development of green jobs required to scale the services and solutions needed for a net zero economy.
Amy M. Brachio
EY Global Vice Chair - Sustainability

A two-step overarching strategy is needed.

The first step is to adopt a multi-stakeholder approach ⏤ one that brings governments, the business community and key third-party stakeholders, including academia, schools and trade associations, together to reshape the employment landscape. Second, that multistakeholder approach can create a new ecosystem where the demand for green jobs will come from and new talent can emerge. “The need for more green jobs will intensify as global economies accelerate the just transition away from fossil fuels. To respond to this shift in demand and to nurture future talent, governments will need to collaborate with educators and business to foster green skills and competencies for people starting their careers as well as workers who need to be re-skilled,” says George Atalla, EY Global Government & Public Sector Leader.

To respond to this shift in demand and to nurture future talent, governments will need to collaborate with educators and business to foster green skills and competencies.
George Atalla
EY Global Government & Public Sector Leader

Needed new roles will involve engineering, digital, problem-solving, monitoring, management and critical thinking skills. To respond to this demand, we believe that governments and policymakers need to focus on four areas:

  1. Public sector capacity building and internal training policies to support the execution of the green transition. Governments must anticipate increased demand for new types of skills and know-how to deliver on green initiatives. Targeted funding and a national green skills plan can help map out the quantity and type of skills needed, where new green jobs should be located (to ensure that no regions are left behind), and how to invest in education and retraining.
  2. Coherent policies within sectors that create and support efficient social and financial mechanisms for life long learning (including social protection allowing for an opportunity to undertake training for a green job when leaving the previous occupation) and re-skilling people into new occupations.
  3. Education programs for young people that introduce green skills (e.g., sustainability and circular economy knowledge) and digital competencies (e.g., programming, data analytics and information security). Digital also impacts on how green jobs will be delivered in an emerging hybrid environment where teams are working remotely, online, in person and offshore. Openness to these types of working dynamics will also impact an organization’s diversity and inclusion agenda and the wellbeing of employees — all critical factors in driving a better ESG strategy for an organization.
  4. Business and governments should closely collaborate to make sure existing employees are best equipped to transition into green jobs and that new employees enter a working environment that can make the best use of their skills.

Shaping the future of the jobs market to deliver a just transition

The challenges governments will face will only increase as our climate crisis intensifies. The required shift to a green economy involves more than just creating and replacing jobs; it requires a fundamental restructuring of the labor market to ensure a sustainable and equitable transition. Current trends indicate a growing demand for green skills and environmentally conscious workplaces among employees and students, highlighting the need for governments to invest in education and training programs to meet these demands. While the challenge is immense, effective leadership — planning and acting now — will help shape a future that benefits future generations and creates positive legacies.

The authors of this article would like to give special thanks to Shalinder Bakshi and Marco Cavalli from the EY organization for their insights.

  • Methodology

    To better understand the leadership role government can play, EY collaborated with a team of academic economists and public policy experts at Politecnico di Milano in Italy throughout 2022 to model possible pathways for governments to lead a green transition. This group and advisory board conducted methodical research to create projections of major macroeconomic, financial and real energy impacts through 2050.

    The analysis is based on an input output stock-flow consistent model (IOSFC), a technique that accounts for how energy is produced in (with financial and human capital), and how it flows through (as an input into production and consumption), the economy.

    In business parlance, IOSFC modeling techniques generate an economy-wide integrated set of financial, economic and physical energy accounts, describing changes to both the balance sheet (e.g., stocks of assets) and the income statement (e.g., flows of energy, goods and services) in a consistent fashion. The technique produces realistic projections of major macroeconomic, financial and real energy variables, enabling a detailed understanding of the feasibility of different transition pathways subject to social, political and economic constraints such as government debt ratios and the unemployment rate.

    In this instance, the dataset for this model covered three regions, Europe, the USA, Asia, the Middle East and Australia, which together represent 75% of global GDP and 80% of global CO2 emissions.

  • Show article references#Hide article references

    1. Future of the Sustainable Workplace, Unily, 2020.
    2. The Next Phase of Business Sustainability,” Stanford Social Innovation Review website, March 2018.
    3. World Energy Employment report, IEA, 2022.
    4. Eco-industries include environmental goods and services sectors undertaking economic activities that have as outcome products for environmental protection and resources management. These include sectors as industries producing/generating green energy, producing and using green vehicles, treating waste. They are opposed by the grey sectors, mostly belonging to fossil fuels supply chains.
    5. Oil rents as a % of GDP,” World Bank website.
    6. “New study confirms €1 trillion Africa’s extraordinary green hydrogen potential,” EIB, 21 December 2022.
    7. Critical Raw Materials in Africa,” EU27 Commission website.

Summary

If the global economy really is to transition away from fossil fuels, that transformation will bring with it a fundamental shift in the employment landscape — creating new green jobs and careers but ending many jobs that are tied to fossil fuel production. How governments support the upskilling and re-skilling of the existing workforce while also preparing a new generation for employment in the green economy will determine the success of a just transition away from fossil fuels.

About this article

Authors
George Atalla

EY Global Government & Public Sector Leader

Working with governments to address complex issues and build a better working world.

Gianluca Di Pasquale

EY Global Green Economies & Infrastructure Leader and Future Cities Co-Leader

Start-upper and a social entrepreneur. Business mentor. Interested in working for big things that will shape the future.

Contributors