- 88% of consumers believe brand messaging does not resonate with their needs and values
- More than a half (55%) of consumers globally very concerned with the rising costs of living
- More than a third (36%) of consumers no longer consider brands when making purchasing decisions
EY data finds consumers are reassessing their choices, forcing brands to prove their worth as they are carefully evaluating price, value and pack size while rethinking the role brands play in their lives. According to the latest EY Future Consumer Index (FCI), 88% of respondents believe brand messaging does not resonate with their needs and values and a slightly more than a third (36%) no longer consider brands when making purchasing decisions.
At a time of continued high inflation, trade tariff uncertainty and a difficult macro-economic environment, consumers are worried, with more than half of respondents (55%) very concerned with the rise of living costs. With price sensitivity topping the list of purchase considerations for 81% of consumer respondents globally, the survey reveals heightened consumer expectations of value, trust and relevance. Almost half (47%) of respondents globally are very concerned about their country’s economy, in particular millennials (50%) and Gen Z (43%).
According to the FCI – which surveyed more than 20,000 consumers across 26 countries – economic pressures are forcing consumers to trade down as more than half (55%) of global consumer respondents report “rising living costs” as a top concern. This is felt most acutely in the US (61%) France (60%) and the UK (58%), with just 16% of Chinese respondents reporting the same concerns.
According to the survey, more than three-quarters (77%) of respondents are actively changing their purchase behavior in response to price increases. When faced with price increases across different product categories, 41% of respondents globally opt for less expensive home and household care products and 17% stop purchasing alcohol altogether. About two-fifths (41%) of consumers surveyed are buying fewer snacks and confectionary.
Private label is reaching a tipping point
The survey reveals the increasing adoption of private label products is reshaping consumer perception, making store brands the preferred alternative to traditional branded options – 67% say private label satisfies their needs just as well as branded products. Thirty six percent of respondents say they no longer consider brands at all when making purchasing decisions. Even when brands turn to innovation and “brand improvements” such as changing ingredients or formulas to create more value, 42% of respondents believe these are simply cost-cutting exercises and not genuine innovation. Nearly nine in 10 (88%) of respondents do not think that brand messaging matches their needs and values, and with 54% of respondents only buying branded products when they are on sale, consumers are prioritizing discounts over brand loyalty.
The FCI data shows that the drivers of private label adoption vary by both generation and by country. In China, Gen Z is driving the shift: on average 37% of China’s Gen Z respondents consider private label across categories, influenced by “dupe” culture, where consumers seek cheaper “duplicates” of more expensive items and smart, frugal choices are a form of status. In contrast, in the US, private label adoption is highest among older consumer respondents, particularly in food and cleaning and household products. In Europe, specifically Germany, private label adoption is being driven by older generations across all product categories when compared with China and the US.
Retailers appear to be tapping into this shift to private label, with 64% of respondents reporting seeing more private labels on shelves and 59% stating they see more private label items positioned at eye level. More than a third (36%) of respondents state they will continue purchasing store brands and do not intend to return to traditional branded products.
Robert Holston, EY Global and Americas Consumer Products Sector Leader, says,
“Consumer behavior has historically shifted during economic downturns, but today’s changes appear to be more fundamental. Unlike past cycles – where consumers returned to familiar brands post-crisis – prolonged inflation, supply chain disruptions and geopolitical instability have reshaped habits permanently.”
“Retailers are introducing private labels with confidence, allocating prime shelf space, and technology is bringing a new dimension by giving consumers the keys to endless choice and comparison. Consumer products companies have a prime opportunity to strengthen their connection with consumers and to stay relevant by adapting to evolving expectations.”
Brands are being forced to prove their worth
The EY Future Consumer Index reveals that Chinese respondents are the most likely to switch brands (66%) and South Africans are the most loyal (38%), but Japanese respondents are most likely to be indifferent towards brands (29%). Gen Z respondents are most likely to switch brands (64%), while millennials are the most loyal (25%).
There are reasons for brands to be optimistic, as 65% of respondents globally state they still value them. Notably, 48% of respondents are willing to return to a premium branded product if it offers superior taste, quality or performance, and 36% would switch back to a brand for better value. A third (33%) are also willing to pay a premium for enhancements that improve product performance. Product categories perceived as the most innovative – beauty (43%), personal care (39%) and household care (39%) – are reaping the rewards of their research and development (R&D) investment.
The survey also reveals that artificial intelligence (AI) still has a way to go to be considered a key shopping tool as 58% of respondents still haven’t made purchase decisions based on AI recommendations. With 50% of AI suggestions favoring premium brands, visibility matters for consumer products companies.
Holston says:
“The survey findings tell us it’s simply not enough to be just good enough. This has been the message to retailers in the past, and now it’s the turn of big brands. Brand loyalty is in the balance and consumers aren’t just buying names anymore – they’re buying value, quality, purpose and performance. Brands that don’t adapt will struggle, while those that evolve can capture new loyalty in an ever-shifting market. This is a perfect time for brands that can sharpen their messages and target their audiences, to break out and gain market share.”
The latest edition of the EY Future Consumer Index is available at: ey.com/FCI15
-ends-
Notes to editors
About EY
EY exists to build a better working world, helping create long-term value for clients, people and society and build trust in the capital markets.
Enabled by data and technology, diverse EY teams in over 150 countries provide trust through assurance and help clients grow, transform and operate.
Working across assurance, consulting, law, strategy, tax and transactions, EY teams ask better questions to find new answers for the complex issues facing our world today.
EY refers to the global organization, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients. Information about how EY collects and uses personal data and a description of the rights individuals have under data protection legislation are available via ey.com/privacy. EY member firms do not practice law where prohibited by local laws. For more information about our organization, please visit ey.com.
This news release has been issued by EYGM Limited, a member of the global EY organization that also does not provide any services to clients.
About the EY Future Consumer Index
The EY Future Consumer Index tracks changing consumer sentiment and behaviors across time horizons and global markets, identifying the new consumer segments that are emerging. The 15th edition of the EY Future Consumer Index surveyed 20,235 consumers across the US, Canada, Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, Chile, Colombia, UK, Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Ireland, Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Australia, New Zealand, Japan, China, India, South Korea, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Nigeria and Netherlands between January 24, 2025 to February 20, 2025.