EY refers to the global organization, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients.
Recent Searches
Legislative amendments to Singapore’s offshore fund tax exemption
Understand the impact of recent legislative amendments to Singapore’s offshore fund tax exemption and what this means for fund managers.
On 20 November 2025, the regulations forming part of the offshore fund tax exemption of section 13D of the Income Tax Act 1947 (ITA) were amended. These amendments brought into legislative effect a series of previously announced changes, some of which were announced over fifteen years ago. This includes changes to the key definitions of specified income and designated investments. While these amendments are mechanical and unremarkable, they serve as a reminder of how the fund tax incentives are administered and their evolution over the years.
For convenience, the fund tax incentives are referred to by their current legislative reference in the analysis below.
Offshore fund tax exemption
The offshore fund tax exemption of section 13D is an important incentive that is heavily relied upon by the local asset management industry. It provides an exemption from Singapore tax on certain income and gains made by an offshore fund. In the absence of this exemption, the risk of Singapore taxation applying to income and gains of an offshore fund would serve as a disincentive for the appointment of a Singapore fund manager or subadvisor. Unlike the other fund tax incentives, the approval of the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) is not required.
The offshore fund tax exemption is part of a matrix of fund incentives in Singapore. It has been designed to integrate with other incentives that may apply at different levels, or to different verticals, of a complex structure. This greatly enhances the structuring choices available to fund sponsors.
The key features of Singapore’s fund tax incentives as they apply to non-single family office structures are summarised in the table below. All of these incentives require the appointment of a licensed or exempt Singapore fund manager.
|
Legislative reference |
Name |
Description |
|---|---|---|
|
Section 13D |
Offshore fund tax exemption |
|
|
Section 13O |
Singapore resident fund scheme |
|
|
Section 13OA |
Singapore resident fund scheme |
|
|
Section 13U |
Enhanced-tier fund tax incentive |
|
|
Section 13V |
Sovereign wealth funds |
|
The scope of the tax exemption provided by the fund tax incentives is broad but not all encompassing. It is only “specified income” from “designated investments” that is exempt. These definitions have gradually expanded over the years. The definition of “specified income” has also changed from an inclusive list to an exclusionary one. All income and gains arising from designated investments are now potentially exempt subject to specific exclusions. While the list of designated investments remains itemised, it has grown with the addition of new types of assets and the reshaping of some of the associated restrictions.
Recent (or not so recent) amendments
The recent amendments to the section 13D regulations bring into effect a number of technical changes to accommodate developments in the fund tax incentives generally. These amendments have staggered and retroactive commencement dates, which present a timeline of sorts.
A good example is the amendments to the section 13D regulations, which are retroactive to 7 July 2010. This is the date that the enhanced-tier fund tax incentive of section 13U was expanded to include Master-Feeder structures. The section 13D regulations now specifically refer to these structures and provide a clear exclusion from the operation of the financial penalty to such structures meeting the approval conditions.
The amendments that have been made to the section 13D regulations are summarised in the table below. This summary includes, by way of further context, the change to the fund tax incentives to which each amendment relates to.
|
Change to fund tax incentive |
MAS circular reference |
Key amendments to section 13D regulations |
Effective date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Expansion of section 13U scheme to include Master-Feeder structures |
05/2010 |
|
7 July 2010 |
|
Minor amendments to definitions of specified income and designated investments |
06/2014 |
|
21 February 2014 |
|
Subsuming section 13C into section 13D |
06/2014 |
|
1 April 2014 |
|
Expansion of section 13U scheme to include Master-SPV and Master-Feeder-SPV structures |
05/2015 |
|
1 April 2015 |
|
Expansion of section 13U to accommodate fund vehicles of all kinds |
05/2018 |
|
20 February 2018 |
|
Various changes. In relation to SPVs as part of an approved section 13U structure, as of 19 February 2019:
|
09/2019 |
|
19 February 2019 |
|
Referencing of provisions within the Income Tax Act |
|
31 December 2021 |
|
|
Inclusion of investment precious metals as a designated investment, subject to a cap |
05/2022 |
|
19 February 2022 |
Applying Singapore’s fund tax incentives
The amendments that have now been made to section 13D highlight a somewhat unique aspect of Singapore’s fund tax incentives.
The fund tax incentives are administered by the MAS, who will issue a number of circulars each year to advisors and industry participants. These circulars are however not merely limited to the manner in which their discretion as a statutory authority is to be exercised. Many times, they describe substantive changes to the scope and operation of the fund tax incentive themselves. Sometimes these changes have been foreshadowed by the Singapore government as part of the annual budget, but not always.
The MAS has been delegated authority under section 3A of the ITA to exercise certain discretionary powers which are conferred on the Minister of Finance. This formal delegation empowers the MAS to approve an applicant under section 13O or section 13U, revoke any such approval and to impose additional conditions as it may see fit.
The general practice of tax advisors and industry participants is to rely on the MAS circulars as if they had the force of law. This is irrespective of whether the changes set out in a circular fall strictly within the scope of the authority delegated to the MAS.
The underlying assumption is that the Inland Revenue Authority (IRAS) will respect substantive amendments set out in an MAS circular before they are legislated. The expectation is that the required amendments will eventually be made by the legislature, and when that occurs, there will be no difference between the drafting of the legislated change from the way it has been previously described in a circular. The best example of this is the changes to the definitions of specified income and designated investments. It is also assumed that complementary changes such as those set out in the recent section 13D amendments will be made in due course.
It is an interesting and complex question as to whether the IRAS is actually bound to respect a change announced to the fund tax incentives before it is legislated. The potential for a disconnect between an announced change and the manner in which it is legislated has thus far proven to be an almost entirely academic question.
It is clear that there is a close alignment between the MAS and the IRAS in the way that the fund tax incentives are to be applied. This cohesion has proven to be greatly beneficial to the local asset management industry. The only practical issue that tends to arise is the inability to apply principles of statutory interpretation to descriptive language set out in the MAS circulars. These are not statutory instruments and are not drafted as such. Any uncertainty in the way in which a condition or feature is described by the MAS is typically resolved through consultation, often involving the local asset management industry associations.
The author of this article is Stephen Banfield, Partner, Financial Services Tax from Ernst & Young Solutions LLP.