An exit strategy is a crucial part of any private equity (PE) investment. It’s how investors cash out and realize a return on their investment. In 2025, PE firms are relying heavily on M&A and secondary sales reflecting a “bird in hand” preference for speed and certainty, driven by strategic corporate buyers and renewed selling activity. This shift reflects PE firms adjusting valuation expectations to adapt to market volatility and tariff-driven cost pressures that are reshaping global business operations. These routes typically deliver quicker returns and lower execution risk compared with IPOs. However, IPO remains a strategic option for firms aiming to maximize long-term value, offering broader access to public capital and visibility, albeit with added complexity and delayed liquidity.
According to the Q2 2025 EY Private Equity Pulse Survey, two-thirds of general partners (GPs) expect their firms’ exit activity to accelerate over the next six months. As 2025 progresses, this sentiment appears to be materializing. PE firms are increasingly favoring IPOs as a viable exit route, supported by global monetary easing, rallies in major equity benchmarks and regulatory tailwinds benefiting high-growth sectors. In the first three quarters, the number of PE-backed IPO listings more than doubled with proceeds rising by 68%.
This momentum has extended across key markets. PE-backed exits reaching their highest level since 2021 in the US, Europe and India, while Greater China and Japan also recorded notable increases. In particular, the US and Nordics saw PE-backed IPOs account for over two-thirds of total listing value, while in South Korea they represented roughly half of the IPO deal value.
Strong aftermarket gains of PE-backed listings
Global PE-backed issuers have shown solid post-listing momentum, delivering notable short-term and YTD gains across multiple regions. The Chinese mainland, for example, led post-IPO performance across all timeframes, with robust gains across key sectors including industrials, life sciences, energy and technology. Hong Kong, the US and India also recorded double-digit returns for these sponsor-backed IPOs. In Hong Kong, consumer and industrials delivered positive returns, financials traded near offer prices, and technology and life sciences underperformed. India and Japan posted mixed post-IPO outcomes, whereas the US saw robust performance across technology, life sciences, advanced manufacturing and financials. In Europe, industrials and technology lagged, but health care, real estate and financial sponsor-backed IPOs demonstrated resilience.
PE-backed technology IPOs, primarily from the US, delivered strong early trading and sustained momentum throughout the tracked windows, fueled by investor enthusiasm for AI, cloud infrastructure, fintech and health tech themes. Meanwhile, industrial sponsor-backed IPOs posted the most significant YTD gains, supported by robust performance from EV battery and auto parts manufacturers, as well as semiconductor companies, primarily from the Chinese mainland. Health and life sciences also performed strongly, led by healthcare providers and diagnostics from Europe, the US and Hong Kong.
In real estate, hospitality and construction, India saw a notable rise in PE-backed issuers, with solid aftermarket returns, while Europe and the Middle East added depth to the sector’s footprint. Energy IPOs re-emerged with PE sponsorship but saw mixed results, with early gains tapering off amid market volatility and transition uncertainty. Consumer IPOs, though fewer, delivered some of the strongest returns, while financials saw more selective PE interest, with modest but stable performance.
Technology and industrials dominate PE-backed IPOs
PE sponsors continue to take a more deliberate approach to when and which companies they bring to the public markets amid ongoing macro uncertainty. However, as borrowing cost ease and valuation gaps narrow, the tailwinds for a sustained recovery continue to coalesce.
Technology IPOs — particularly in software, software-as-a-service (SaaS), apps and cloud platforms — have led the recovery in PE-backed exits with most activity in the US, dominating large public listings this year. Industrials have also seen strong momentum, with China accounting for the bulk of PE-backed listings, especially among component suppliers and machinery firms. While tech IPO volumes have surpassed the combined total of the first nine months of past three years, they remain well below 2021’s peak. In contrast, PE-backed industrials have fully rebounded, matching 2021 levels in both deal count and proceeds.
Among the top 10 YTD global PE-backed IPOs, a majority were profitable at the time of listing, reflecting sponsors’ growing focus on bringing only mature, earnings-generating companies to market. Performance has also been robust: eight of these deals traded above their offer prices by late September, with several delivering exceptional gains — exceeding 30 times investors’ initial outlay. The trend underscores PE firms’ focus on careful exit timing, resilient business models and strong post-listing visibility.
Business implications
Preparing for an IPO sets the highest bar for readiness across operational, financial and governance dimensions. Companies achieving IPO-readiness become well-positioned for alternative exits like M&A, secondary buyout or dual listings, providing strategic flexibility in markets where timing and sentiment shift rapidly. This flexibility is critical given the challenges funds face when approaching an exit versus the benefits associated with getting equity story and readiness right.
Success demands compelling narratives that resonate with PE investors and public market stakeholders, prioritizing profitability pathways, robust governance and ESG alignment. Companies must demonstrate specific value inflection points and articulate how IPO proceeds will fuel innovation, deleveraging and sustainable growth. Meanwhile, PE firms must develop comprehensive post-listing strategies extending beyond initial offerings. This includes managing lock-up periods strategically, executing staged exit plans, maintaining active boardroom involvement, and ensuring continued engagement post-IPO to retain influence over strategic decisions that drive value creation.
For firms that are IPO-ready, every exit remains possible, and the potential upside may outweigh faster alternatives, particularly when timed around growth inflection points, supported by compelling equity stories and aligned with market windows.