The state of the grid infrastructure
Historically, Kazakhstan’s energy system was constructed assuming the centralized supply from large power plants. The generating capacities were mainly concentrated in the north, with a long distance to the major consumers in the south, which by itself leads to power flows via power transmission lines. In these circumstances, integration of distributed generation under the corporate PPAs faces the issue of network limitations. The transmission capacity of networks and their worn-out state become a critical factor: many renewable energy resources (solar energy, wind power) are located in remote areas with weak local networks and are not designed for high power output. If a large enterprise is willing to enter into a PPA with a RES-based power plant in a different region, the networks of KEGOC, the system operator, would be required to be employed for energy transmission – and this may cause a problem as the lines are overloaded. Transmission “bottlenecks” are already seen in the north and center of the country, forcing the RES-based power plants to restrict power output (curtailment mode). The deficit of grid infrastructure assets and transmission bottlenecks are a substantial barrier to stepping up the volume of corporate PPA in Kazakhstan7. The solution requires the network upgrade and construction of new lines, especially for connection of future RES projects as part of PPAs.
It is noteworthy that the purpose of certain corporate PPAs is the isolation from the challenges faced by the networks. The above example, i.e., KMG-Eni’s project in Mangystau, was primarily established to guarantee local energy security for its oil production and reduce reliance on the external network suffering from capacity deficit and power failures6. Such an autonomous scheme (generation plus storage on the consumption site) is one of the solutions to deal with the infrastructure issues for remote consumers. However, the option of constructing in situ generation is not affordable to all consumers, so many consumers will have to rely on the communal energy system.
Balancing and regulation of capacity
The System Operator requires that subsidy-free RES projects have their regulated capacity. This technical aspect substantially affects the PPA’ form: in essence, each project should include a balancing plan. The above example already suggests a solution – hybrid power plants combining renewables and gas-fired installations. From the technical perspective, this approach is optimal for securing sustainable supply: gas turbine or diesel power plant backstops RES intermittency and maintains frequency. However, battery energy storage systems (BESS) may well be an alternative option as they become increasingly cost effective along with the development of technologies. The energy storage facilities have not been used in Kazakhstan so far; however, they will be able to partially replace the gas-fired power capacity in the long-term as a source of manoeuvre.
The load on regulatory systems may also be mitigated though sites grouping. The concept of “hybrid groups” introduced by the Ministry of Energy for KMG-Eni project is actually setting the model: there could be multiple generating and consuming units and a single group administrator interacting with the dispatcher as a balancing unit8,6. It is an attractive technical solution allowing, for example, an investor to combine a RES power plant and a storage facility in a group and connect consumers to them locally. Such approach resembles a microgrid integrated into a communal system: it mitigates the effects of RES intermittency on the external network as the group provides a smoothed load schedule. The implementation of such schemes requires improved telemetry, automated load frequency control (ALFC) and conclusion of special contracts with KEGOC. From a technical perspective, Kazakhstan is already moving in this direction – KEGOC is implementing projects to introduce process control systems (PCS) and RES production forecasting systems. The System Operator’s representatives point out the need for exact prediction of generation and development of smart network technologies to integrate the growing RES park without compromising reliability.
Limitations and the ways to overcome them
As a result, in Kazakhstan, today there are principally two key technical limitations for corporate PPAs: the throughput capacity/reliability of networks and deficit of regulatory capacities. Their solution lies within investments into infrastructure. At the government level, projects have already been scheduled to enhance the national electric grid, construct a new North-South high voltage power line and upgrade substations, which will create an environment for commissioning new generation facilities. RES integration will be accelerated if the business sector also gets involved in the construction of the backup generators and energy storage (possibly through the market compensation for frequency and capacity regulation). At the level of separate corporate PPA projects, companies are already prepared to invest in their own storage sources, as shown by the hybrid projects as an example. As time passes, with storage technologies becoming cheaper, technical capabilities will arise for the introduction of fully renewable energy installations for corporations (e.g., RES + large storage solutions without the use of fossil fuel). Even at the current stage, trade-off solutions (RES + gas) result in significant effect in terms of reducing emissions and saving fuel; therefore, they are justified. Kazakhstan will need to adjust its energy system rules so that corporations could arrive at win-win technical solutions together with network operators – whether it is the fee for capacity storage or joint use of energy storage – which allow securely connecting new corporate RES power plants.