Mother and child at laptop with baby

How Budget 2026 could ease the tax squeeze on sandwiched working mums

Authors

5 minute read 09 Feb 2026
Related topics
Tax
Workforce

The personal income tax relief cap could be tweaked to better support working mothers amid rising wages and changing caregiving needs. 

In brief
  • Singapore’s personal income tax relief cap was designed to maintain a progressive tax system while safeguarding fiscal sustainability.
  • But with rising wages and changing demographics, the total reliefs for working mothers may exceed the cap.
  • Budget 2026 offers an opportunity to refine the cap and relief structure to ensure reliefs truly support families and strengthen the nation's social fabric.

How EY can Help

  • Domestic tax planning

    Our domestic tax planning professionals can help you build strong compliance and reporting foundations as well as sustainable tax strategies. Learn more.

    Read more

In 2016, Singapore introduced an S$80,000 personal income tax relief cap to maintain a progressive tax system while safeguarding fiscal sustainability.  

 

In effect since 2018, the cap limits high-income earners with multiple dependents from claiming excessive reliefs, which could reduce tax revenue and undermine progressivity. The measure was to affect only a small proportion of taxpayers. Yet the cap disproportionately impacted high-income working mothers — individuals contributing to the workforce while fulfilling caregiving responsibilities.  

 

This is largely due to the Working Mother’s Child Relief (WMCR). Previously calculated as a percentage of the working mother’s earned income, it provided substantial support for individuals with several children and higher salaries. High-income working mothers are now unable to fully benefit from the WMCR, limiting the incentive for them to remain in the workforce while raising children.

 

Changing demographics, rising pressures

Family structures, caregiving needs and economic realities have shifted significantly. Fertility rates have fallen to historic lows, eldercare burdens have intensified, and female workforce participation continues to rise.  

 

Families are currently delaying or limiting childbearing due to rising costs and growing eldercare responsibilities. Aside from the WMCR, the government has introduced numerous tax reliefs to help mothers remain in the workforce or rejoin it, reduce the financial burden on multigenerational caregiving and promote retirement adequacy. Examples include Parent Relief and Central Provident Fund (CPF) Cash Top-up Relief alongside Supplementary Retirement Scheme (SRS) contributions. 

 

However, when legitimate claims compete under a capped ceiling, the intended support is diluted. Consider someone from the sandwich generation, with three children born from 2024 onward and elderly parents. The WMCR alone amounts to S$30,000.  

 

Together with the Qualifying Child Relief (QCR) of S$12,000, Parent Relief of up to S$9,000, Grandparent Caregiver Relief (GCR) of S$3,000, CPF Cash Top-up Relief of up to S$16,000 and standard reliefs — the total reliefs for the female taxpayer may exceed the cap.  

 

While the median female salary has risen from S$4,095 in 2018 to S$5,265 in 2024, the cap disadvantages the upper-middle-income bracket — a demographic crucial for corporate leadership and high-value economic contribution. As wages rise, more women are moving toward this ceiling where limits on reliefs inadvertently penalize career progression.  

Evolving the relief structure

To ensure the relief framework remains equitable and responsive to today’s realities, there is scope for the government to review its structure. 

1. Calibrate the overall relief cap by income and family size

Rather than a one-size-fits-all ceiling, a tiered approach would better reflect household realities.  

A tiered or family-size-adjusted cap would provide additional relief room for taxpayers with more dependents, balancing fairness with fiscal prudence. This would better reflect the realities of multigenerational caregiving and support national goals for family formation.  

The original intent was progressivity, but the cap currently affects middle- to upper-middle-income families with complex caregiving responsibilities, rather than just high earners. 

2. Targeted exclusions of caregiving reliefs from the cap 

Reliefs that directly support family formation and caregiving, such as QCR, Parent Relief and GCR, should be treated differently. Excluding them from the S$80,000 cap while retaining scheme-level limits would help families receive full support without undermining progressivity.  

Similarly, allowing CPF Cash Top-up Relief and SRS contributions outside the cap would incentivize voluntary contributions to boost retirement savings without penalizing taxpayers for making responsible choices.

3. A dual-scheme WMCR framework   

The change in the WMCR from a percentage-based system to fixed-dollar amounts for children born from 1 January 2024 improves predictability. However, this disadvantages mothers earning an annual income above S$53,334 — the threshold where the new fixed relief amounts fall below the previous percentage-based entitlements. This income level sits within Singapore’s middle class, many of whom are squeezed by rising costs of living and heavy caregiving responsibilities while being ineligible for extensive subsidies.  

To address this, a dual-scheme framework could be considered where mothers can opt into either scheme each year, with the same scheme applying to all children regardless of birth date. A working mother could choose between the previous percentage-based scheme subject to the overall cap or opt for the new fixed-dollar scheme with the WMCR excluded from the cap. This flexibility allows families to optimize tax savings without losing other reliefs. 

A dual-scheme WMCR framework could provide the flexibility needed for families to optimize tax savings without losing other reliefs.

How EY can Help

  • Tax policy

    Our tax policy professionals can help you stay ahead of potential tax changes, better manage tax risk and understand key tax trends. Find out more.

    Read more
4. Addressing parent and child relief issues 

With fewer nuclear families and more seniors without children, expanding the Parent Relief to cover extended elderly family members (such as grandaunts or granduncles) would acknowledge modern multigenerational care obligations. Introducing age-based tiers within the Parent Relief — offering higher relief for older dependents — would align tax support with increasing caregiving intensity. 

 

Excluding National Service allowances and internship stipends from the S$8,000 annual income threshold for child relief would also prevent families from losing eligibility due to temporary earnings that do not reflect sustained financial independence.  

 

Preserving equity through thoughtful adjustments

Singapore’s tax system is designed to be progressive, competitive and supportive of social objectives. The S$80,000 cap achieved its purpose in 2018. However, it interacts with policies in ways that may not fully align with national priorities regarding family formation, retirement adequacy and workforce resilience today. 

 

Budget 2026 offers an opportunity to refine the cap and relief structure. By making thoughtful adjustments, the government can preserve equity while ensuring reliefs truly serve their purpose: supporting families and strengthening Singapore’s social fabric.

Summary

With shifting demographics and rising wages, legitimate claims of working mothers competing under Singapore's personal income tax relief cap could dilute the intended support. Targeted exclusions of caregiving reliefs from the cap, a tiered or family-size-adjusted cap, a dual-scheme WMCR framework and addressing parent and child relief issues can preserve equity while ensuring reliefs truly serve their purpose.    

Related articles

How can tax and finance leaders build agile functions that thrive?

Tax and finance functions need to create agility and facilitate continuous transformation to deal with constant disruption and leverage AI.

Dave Helmer + 1

How Singapore Budget 2025 doubles down on workforce transformation

Maintaining workforce competitiveness remains key and fine-tuning the implementation of workforce measures is vital to their efficacy. Learn more.

Samir Bedi + 1

How Budget 2025 shapes Singapore’s future with confidence

Singapore Budget 2025 puts driving inclusive, sustainable growth for enterprises and individuals at its heart. Learn more.

    About this article

    Authors

    Related topics
    Tax
    Workforce

    EY refers to the global organization, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients.