Person in gallery enjoying the digital art installation

Three strategic priorities for banking CROs in 2026

The 15th annual EY/IIF survey shows how CROs can serve as strategic copilots in navigating today’s complex and volatile risk landscape.


In brief

  • Credit risk and financial crime have re-emerged as top concerns, even as geopolitics, macroeconomics and disruptive technology reshape the CRO agenda.
  • Regulatory fragmentation has led to a loosening of supervisory requirements in some jurisdictions but tightening and localization in others.
  • CROs see advanced technology, higher-quality data and the right talent as critical enablers for enhancing risk management in the future.

Bank chief risk officers (CROs) are operating in a world defined by nonlinear, accelerated, volatile and interconnected (NAVI) risks. Macroeconomic shifts, geopolitical tensions, the prevalence of artificial intelligence (AI) and the growth of private credit add up to more uncertainty. As one CRO put it, “the role is no longer the chief risk officer — it is the chief uncertainty officer.”

Different types of risks are converging and compounding faster than traditional risk management frameworks can respond. Concerns about financial crime and digital fraud are rising in line with accelerating adoption of AI and digital assets. Credit risk is an urgent priority again, because of the increasing likelihood of defaults and the competitive threats posed by private equity firms and other non-banks.

The role is no longer the chief risk officer — it is the chief uncertainty officer.

The 15th annual EY/IIF global bank risk management survey shows how CROs are being pushed beyond compliance-focused oversight into a more strategic, forward-looking and decision‑shaping role across the enterprise.

“Proliferating risk profiles are an indicator of the dynamic nature of the banking business. Bold thinking by CROs and adaptive risk strategies have never been more important to sustaining profitability despite persistent volatility”, said Nigel Moden, EY Global Banking & Capital Markets Leader. 

By embracing the strategic priorities outlined below, CROs can build agile, tech-enabled risk management operations that both protect the business and foster responsible growth in this time of uncertainty.

Download the EY/IIF global bank risk management survey

The CRO action plan for navigating uncertainty: three priorities for 2026

Our survey results suggest how CROs can strengthen key capabilities to engage more effectively with other business leaders.

1. Accelerate responsible AI adoption

For all the risks associated with AI, CROs are adopting it as a vital risk management tool. Most banks are still early in their journey: 72% report limited adoption within the risk function, with current use cases focused on fraud and financial crime detection.

At the same time, 55% of CROs said implementing advanced technologies is one of their top three focus areas for managing important risks. That signals a clear shift toward more sophisticated applications. For the next wave of deployments, CROs plan to expand AI into credit and market risk modeling, cyber and operational resilience, and real‑time monitoring.

Using technology to manage risk
55%
of CRO respondents say implementing advanced technologies is a top focus for managing important risks.
We think there is huge potential in leveraging AI. The real cost is in change management, underlying infrastructure, people and the time to do it right.

As AI spreads across the enterprise and agentic AI deployments increase, CROs face a dual responsibility: using AI to strengthen risk capabilities while also putting in place the controls, governance models, and specialist talent needed to ensure that AI enhances decision‑making without creating new vulnerabilities.

Data quality and security remain top barriers, but CROs recognize other challenges to broader adoption. One noted that, while AI’s potential is significant, “the real cost is in change management, underlying infrastructure, people and the time to do it right.” These practical constraints influence how quickly and responsibly AI can scale across the organization.

2. Develop hybrid, high‑performance risk teams

It’s clear that CROs, like their C-suite peers, recognize the need for workforce transformation in banking. This year, respondents reiterated the need for both discrete technical skills (e.g., cybersecurity, AI, data science) and broader knowledge (e.g., digital acumen, business knowledge, critical thinking, ethics). Digital “athletes” proficient in both technical and operational domains will be well suited for hybrid risk-business positions. In these roles, experienced risk professionals are deeply involved with technology transformation, product innovation, and other essential initiatives.


Demand for digital, data and AI proficiency has never been higher, but CROs expect hiring to slow. Thirty percent now anticipate smaller risk teams over the next three years (up from 16% last year), and those expecting to increase hiring has dropped from 68% to 49% since the 2024 survey.

How will they address greater risk with fewer overall resources? AI’s automation of administrative tasks, along with upskilling, specialized talent, and hybrid roles, will help bridge the gap between future capabilities and existing capacity.

Modernizing the risk workforce: CRO talent priorities evolve with AI
79%
will emphasize upskilling in AI and data science (e.g., data analytics, model interpretation, AI tools).
64%
expect to reduce traditionally manual roles (e.g., compliance testing, reporting, controls, data analysis).
55%
will create hybrid AI-risk specialist roles combining domain knowledge and AI proficiency.


3. Enhance scenario planning to prepare for future volatility

The ability to “see around corners” has long been a hallmark of effective CROs. As financial and nonfinancial risks proliferate and uncertainty increases, CROs can use sophisticated scenario modeling and risk measurement techniques to address the most urgent threats.

These capabilities matter now more than ever. Given the lack of transparency around private credit exposures, unpredictable geopolitical conditions and regulatory fragmentation. Scenario modeling can help banking leaders navigate all these forms of uncertainty. “With the long-term impacts of recent global events on the banking business just now coming into view, CROs who adopt forward-looking perspectives can define the most likely range of future outcomes,” said Christopher Woolard CBE, EY Global Regulatory Network Chair. “Such strategic leadership is how CROs can best prepare their institutions for what’s ahead.”

The role of scenario planning in risk management
82 %
of CROs say they are looking to strengthen resilience plans via scenario planning and tabletop exercises to mitigate geopolitical risks.
78 %
of CROs say enhanced risk measurement, stress testing and scenario analysis are the top planned enhancements to financial risk management.

To be clear, scenario modeling is just one component of a broader readiness agenda. CROs are also refining risk appetites and frameworks, updating governance models and strengthening internal controls. By embedding risk metrics into decision-making, CROs can modernize risk management strategies and act as strategic advisors, helping leadership anticipate risks, navigate uncertainty and prepare for a volatile future. 
 

CRO priorities over the years

Over the past 15 years, the CRO agenda has shifted in response to the major events that have shaped global banking. In 2009, the focus was on regulatory compliance and rebuilding capital strength. By 2014, the spotlight moved to conduct and culture as institutions worked to restore trust. In 2019, the rise of digital transformation brought cyber and operational resilience to the forefront. By 2024, nonfinancial risks such as fraud, financial crime and geopolitical shocks had become defining features of the risk landscape. Entering 2026, the agenda reflects a convergence of old and new pressures — from credit concerns and regulatory questions, to nontraditional competitors and the latest disruptive tech.  


Throughout this evolution, the CRO role has expanded significantly. It has moved from a position focused on oversight to one that contributes directly to strategy and enterprise leadership. As Tom Campanile noted, “For years, our survey results have suggested why CROs must push to serve as strategic advisors to the business. This year’s findings show that the time has arrived and highlight how CROs can move forward.”

The current environment confirms that CROs are entering a new phase in which their influence shapes both resilience and growth.

For years, our survey results have suggested why CROs should serve as strategic advisors to the business. This year’s findings show that the time is now and highlight how they can move forward.

Looking ahead, milestone events, market developments, and diversifying threats will continue to reshape the risk agenda at a faster pace than in the past. The increasing use of AI, the arrival of quantum computing, the growth of private credit and ongoing geopolitical uncertainty will require CROs to broaden their perspective and anticipate risks earlier.

Download the EY/IIF global bank risk management survey

Summary

Despite their full agendas, CROs must continually look ahead and model how risks will compound and accelerate, as they inevitably seem to do. The institutions that empower their CROs to lead strategically with data, foresight and adaptive talent will be the ones best positioned to navigate whatever comes next. In today’s uncertain and volatile world, only one thing seems assured: The CRO’s mandate will continue to expand.

Related articles

Four regulatory shifts financial firms must watch in 2026

Our Global Financial Services Regulatory Outlook has four regulatory priorities to drive financial institutions' focus in 2026. Download the report.

How can reimagining today's workforce help banks shape their future?

By focusing on four bold imperatives, banks can differentiate in the competition for top talent and drive higher returns on people investments.

    About this article

    Authors