OSPs have grown dramatically from a low base, creating valuable new distribution partners for ETF providers. Across Europe, the total number of OSPs grew from 7.6m to 10.8m over the course of 2024 (pdf). Germany is the leading market by far, but a range of local and international providers are also offering OSPs in markets including the UK, Ireland, Austria, Italy, Spain, Switzerland, Denmark and Sweden. Providers launching OSPs include neobanks, online brokers, and traditional banks acquiring neobrokers.9
The growth of OSPs is projected to accelerate, with one recent study predicting that Europe could see 32m investor accounts holding €650b in ETF assets by 2028 (pdf). The user-friendly digital platforms offering OSPs are boosting accessibility and often charge lower fees than traditional investment brokers. Many provide educational resources to help investors understand ETF investing, and some are integrated with robo-advisors to offer holistic, automated investment solutions. Set against that, the associated marketing expenses can be significant for ETF providers.
For now, European ETF investing remains heavily tilted towards the institutional segment. Even so, the prize of retail adoption is getting closer – and bigger. It’s especially appealing to newer ETF providers, since a lack of track record is less of an obstacle than among institutional investors. The challenge now for ETF issuers and brokers is to pick the investors and territories they wish to focus on, and to develop cost-effective strategies to enter or scale up in those markets. Getting ETF structuring, promotion and distribution right will be vital to maximizing returns on expenditure – and capturing the upside of European retail growth.
4. ETF market entry routes are becoming clearer
Growing levels of ETF AUM and the increasing range of product options are attracting new entrants to ETF markets in the US, Europe and beyond. Asset managers, ranging from the world’s largest firms to far smaller niche operators, are exploring the potential benefits of ETFs. Interest in becoming an ETF provider is especially strong among mid-tier asset firms, many of which face growing profitability pressures and have little or no ETF experience.
Most firms seeking to enter the ETF market can choose between five possible routes. Intense competitive forces and profitability pressures mean that new entrants should carefully consider the practicalities of each route – including cost, speed, skills, technology and regulation.
- Build. There are many reasons why firms choose to build their own capabilities as an ETF issuer. Many of the hundreds of active ETFs launched in the US during 2024 were “siblings” of successful mutual funds, for example. The time, money and resources involved mean that this route is often attractive to large firms keen to develop permanent ETF expertise, to exercise complete control, and to leverage existing distribution networks.
- Buy. Acquiring an existing issuer, either to gain a foothold in the industry or to enter a new ETF market, is one potential solution for firms seeking an instant footprint - and with sufficient capital to make this expensive option a possibility.
- Partner. White label ETF providers allow firms to launch ETFs fast, and to dip their toe in the market without the capital commitment of building the necessary infrastructure. It’s appealing for firms with limited budgets, and for those seeking a limited ETF trial. However, it’s essential to understand the respective roles of managers and white label providers. White labeling can limit day-to-day control and the growth of in-house expertise, and managers remain responsible for selling and distribution. Bilateral collaboration with specialist partners, such as an alternative investment manager, may also be a possibility.
- Convert. The number of mutual fund to ETF conversions is rising each year, climbing from 15 in 2021 to 57 in 2024 (pdf). Investors can enjoy liquidity, cost and tax benefits, while conversion can help issuers to increase net inflows. However, it’s worth noting that, where mutual funds are held within tax efficient wrappers such as a 401k, ETF conversions may only provide limited tax advantages.
- ETF share classes. European regulators including those in Ireland and Luxembourg now permit mutual funds to create ETF share classes. Although not currently permitted in the US, more than 30 issuers including several industry leaders have filed applications for multi-share class structures (both active and passive) since the expiry of a separate ETF share class patent in 2023. These structures can help to achieve economies of scale, but there is also potential for investor confusion, more complex reporting, reduced tax advantages, and “cash drag” on ETF shares.
Asset managers choosing between possible market entry routes should begin by thinking carefully about their existing profile, capabilities, strengths and weaknesses. They must also ask key questions about their strategic goals – such as which markets they want to enter, how much they want to spend, and how quickly they want to achieve results. A strong understanding of the ETF ecosystem is vital too. New entrants often fail to appreciate:
- the importance of strong capital market links to a successful launch
- the time and effort required to build the authorized participant relationships that are crucial to long-term growth
- the need for ETF-specific expertise in management, distribution, reporting, valuation and administration
- the complexity of regulatory landscapes - especially in Europe, where issuers face multiple listing requirements
Finally, firms need to ensure that their ETF market entry plans are aligned with wider strategies and the fundamentals of their business model. Providers should be ready to explain why they are choosing to launch ETFs; how this complements the rest of their business; what it means for their branding; and why they expect ETF issuance to have a positive long-term impact for investors.
ETF markets may offer attractive growth opportunities, but they are also highly competitive and increasingly specialized. Knowledge, planning and execution across a wide range of capabilities are vital if market entry strategies are to deliver lasting success for new ETF issuers.