Where a GIR is filed in the jurisdiction of the UPE or DFE, and an effective MCAA is in place between Japan and that jurisdiction as of the filing deadline, the GIR is not required to be filed in Japan under the central filing approach, provided that the GIR Notification is submitted in Japan. In this case, if there are multiple Constituent Entities in Japan, a Designated Local Entity may be designated in the GIR Notification, so that the other Japanese Constituent Entities are not required to submit the notification.
On the other hand, if a GIR is not filed in any jurisdiction, or if there is no effective MCAA between Japan and the jurisdiction where the GIR is filed as of the GIR filing deadline, the default local filing approach applies and a GIR must be filed in Japan. In this case, if the Japanese Constituent Entity does not have any foreign subsidiaries or permanent establishments (PEs), only Section 1 of the GIR is required to be filed under Pattern 3 in Figure 4 above. However, if the Japanese Constituent Entity has foreign subsidiaries or PEs, and Japan has taxing rights under the IIR with respect to the jurisdictions where those subsidiaries or PEs are located, Pattern 2 in Figure 4 above applies. In this case, in addition to Section 1, information in Sections 2 and 3 relating to the jurisdictions with taxing rights must also be included in the GIR.
It should be noted that, in order for a GIR filing in the subsidiary jurisdiction to be discharged through central filing, the GIR must be filed by the UPE or DFE. Accordingly, if a GIR is not filed by the UPE or DFE, and instead an Intermediate Parent Entity files a GIR containing only information relating to the jurisdictions with taxing rights under its ownership chain, the central filing approach cannot be used. In such cases, local filing of the GIR would be required in the jurisdictions where the subsidiaries under that Intermediate Parent Entity are located.
In addition, as a recent development, the Side-by-Side Safe Harbour (the “SbS SH”) included in the Side-by-Side Package released by the OECD in January 2026, can be applied to the MNE Group whose UPE is located in the United States. Where the SbS SH applies, for the purpose of applying the IIR and UTPR, the Top-up Tax deemed to be zero with respect to all of the MNE Group’s Constituent Entities. However, because the SbS SH applies to Fiscal Years beginning on or after January 2026, a GIR will be required to be filed in the subsidiary jurisdictions that have implemented the IIR in the first year of application. In addition, even for Fiscal Years to which the SbS SH applies, it is considered that, as with other safe harbours, MNE Groups will be required to make an election in the GIR to apply the SbS SH. Accordingly, Japanese Constituent Entities that are part of US-headed MNE Groups should note that, in the first year of application, they will be required either to (i) file a GIR in Japan through local filing or (ii) submit the GIR Notification in Japan through central filing.
2. IIR tax return
Because Japan’s IIR does not apply to domestic Constituent Entities, where a Japanese Constituent Entity does not have any foreign subsidiaries or PEs, no Top-up Tax will arise in Japan under the IIR, and an IIR tax return will not be required in Japan. However, where a Japanese entity has foreign subsidiaries or PEs and Top-up Tax arises with respect to the jurisdictions where those subsidiaries or PEs are located, Japanese Constituent Entity that belongs to a foreign-owned MNE Group will be required to file an IIR tax return in Japan as an Intermediate Parent Entity or Partially-Owned Parent Entity (POPE).
In summary, the actions required for foreign-owned Japanese entities can be categorized into the following cases.
Figure 6: Foreign-owned Japanese entities: required actions by scenario