Regulatory context
The global focus on sustainability is clear, with companies around the world recognizing the importance of environmental, social, and governance matters encompassed by the term “ESG”. ESG has evolved from being seen merely a risk management tool to a driver of value[1]. Consequently, sustainability performance has become a critical factor for assessing overall corporate success.
The momentum behind ESG transformations is driven by a combination of increasing demands from consumers and investors, alongside growing pressures from policymakers and evolving regulatory frameworks. Consumers increasingly favour companies with transparent sustainability goals, with 52% saying they trust companies more when they publicly share long-term sustainability and responsibility goals. Furthermore, a significant 90% of investors now prioritize ESG performance in their decision-making processes[2]. This highlights the growing importance of ESG considerations in shaping business success and stakeholder confidence.
Moreover, global efforts to design, harmonize, and mandate international ESG disclosure standards are resulting in new regulatory and reporting requirements, as well as an increase in complex sustainability tasks and processes[3]. For example, the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) mandates that large EU companies and their subsidiaries disclose and obtain external assurance on a comprehensive range of ESG matters. From January 2024, the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) has implemented comprehensive disclosure standards, namely IFRS S1 and IFRS S2. The landscape is further complicated by evolving frameworks and standards from entities such as the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG), the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), the EU taxonomy for sustainable activities, and the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB). Additionally, sustainability ratings and indices from organizations like S&P Global, FTSE Russell, and the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) add layers of complexity.
In response to the evolving demands for sustainability and regulatory changes, companies must consistently provide high-quality, transparent, and comparable ESG data that accurately reflects their environmental and social impact, commitments, and progress in these areas. To ensure this data is reliable and has a real impact on the decisions of stakeholders, ESG reporting must mirror the rigor and structure of financial reporting. This means adopting similar procedures, controls, and auditability. Just as financial reporting underpins investor confidence and market stability, ESG reporting should be equally systematic and enforceable to uphold its significance in assessing corporate sustainability and risk, thereby addressing the complexity of modern corporate accountability.
Key challenges
Despite the increasing importance of ESG data and reporting, even organizations with strong sustainability ambitions face significant challenges in disclosing their ESG performance metrics.
To begin with, collecting ESG-related data is often a highly manual and time-consuming task, with the primary challenge lying in the quality and consistency of this data[4]. Much of the essential ESG data is complex and not organised in a standardised format, presenting numerous technological and methodological challenges. In addition, the process of data collection is made even more demanding by the need to gather ESG data from various departments within an organisation. Following data collection, there is an equally challenging task of merging data from various business areas into a format that can be understood, analysed, and reported on. This task is becoming even more daunting as reporting regulations continuously tighten and evolve, necessitating continuous monitoring, while the volume of required data increases and the capabilities required for handling ESG data rapidly evolve[5]. Therefore, lack of centralized data management makes many companies concerned about the ability to obtain accurate information in a timely manner.
As a result of these challenges, many companies committed to sustainability struggle to centralize and share sustainability data effectively. Falling behind on compliance and regulatory changes not only further escalates the cost of ESG reporting efforts but also erodes stakeholders' and investors' trust and confidence in the company's commitment to sustainability.
Summarised below are the key challenges that businesses encounter in advancing data-driven ESG reporting:
- Not knowing where to start
- Challenges in collecting data metrics[6]
- Absence of ESG data models
- Lack of clear reporting guidelines
- Difficulty in integration with existing IT landscape
- Using multiple solutions often incompatible with each other
- Capacity and skill gaps in own workforce[7]
Possible solutions
As companies face challenges in meeting both regulatory requirements and stakeholder expectations, the burden of compliance poses a threat to the value creation from ESG data. This underscores the importance of implementing comprehensive, end-to-end ESG reporting workflows that mirror the processes, efficiency, and timeliness of financial reporting systems. These workflows need to facilitate the seamless gathering of reliable and verifiable data, with the integration of advanced digital technologies being crucial in enabling a reporting infrastructure that is equivalent to that of financial reporting.
Advanced ESG technology platforms offer robust features, such as agile systems that quickly and accurately collect, organize, and analyse ESG data. In addition, they help businesses to formalize sustainability targets, plan and execute action plans, and track progress with key metrics over time. These platforms also facilitate the creation of visually appealing dashboards with graphs, manage the increasing volume of information, and simplify the reporting process, ensuring compliance and enhancing the value of ESG efforts.