EY refers to the global organization, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients.
How EY can help
For decades, ERP systems have supported budgets, assets, maintenance planning and operational consistency. That role remains foundational. Organizations continue to rely on accurate, auditable records to ensure accountability and control.
What has changed is the environment around them. Organizations now manage far greater volumes of information, face heightened performance expectations and operate under increasing time pressure. Critical insights are often dispersed across reports, dashboards and tools. In this context, recording activity alone is no longer sufficient. The greater challenge is helping people make sense of the information they already have.
A data‑first foundation is part of this shift. As data grows in volume and complexity, organizations require consistent structures and shared models so that information means the same thing across functions, systems and teams. This challenge is not unique. Across industries, organizations are finding that artificial intelligence (AI) investments deliver value only when underlying operational systems are ready to support insight. AI rarely scales in isolation unless the structures beneath it are aligned.
At the same time, ERP’s role within the broader AI agenda is becoming more critical. Modern AI use cases increasingly depend on ERP’s ability to expose high‑quality, well‑structured and governed data. ERP must therefore enable not only in‑system intelligence, but also external AI workloads — for example, enabling secure data flows into platforms such as Model Context Protocol (MCP), where agents, copilots and analytical models can leverage ERP data effectively.
Technology readiness alone, however, is not enough. The value of AI — like ERP — depends heavily on adoption. Without strong change management, training and support, even well‑designed capabilities risk the same low‑adoption challenges that have affected many ERP programs.
It is also important to acknowledge why many ERP initiatives struggle in the first place. ERP is often approached as a systems deployment rather than a sustained business transformation. Process ownership remains fragmented, data governance is inconsistent and change management is underfunded. Over time, local workarounds re‑emerge, reporting fragments across tools and trust in the system weakens. In such environments, ERP becomes a compliance requirement rather than a source of insight. Simply layering AI on top of these conditions will not deliver understanding; it may instead amplify inconsistency.
For ERP to genuinely evolve into a platform that supports interpretation and timely action, accountability, data discipline and executive sponsorship must be addressed with the same rigor as the technology itself.