According to the Australian Department of Industry, Science and Resources, AI adoption is highest among larger companies.1 Nearly 35 per cent of large businesses reported using AI in 2024-25, while around 11 per cent of small and micro businesses had adopted AI.2 AI adoption rates were also highest for businesses which undertook innovation activities in the year, such as improving a product, service or business process. The AI adoption rate for large businesses which actively innovated in 2024-25 was 37 per cent, well above 29 per cent for those large businesses which did not undertake any innovation activity in the year.3
While commercial adoption of generative AI4 is still at a relatively early stage, 57 per cent of ASX200 companies reported they were actively investing in AI-related technologies in 2024.5 Although large companies have the resources to invest in AI, their scale makes it harder to pivot quickly. In contrast, small and medium-sized businesses tend to focus on practical, value-driven AI use cases aligned directly to business outcomes. As a result, these organisations can move faster, experiment more efficiently, and often achieve a higher return on investment relative to their capital spending.
AI is expected to boost productivity and employment opportunities, though outcomes will differ by sector
The deployment of AI presents a significant opportunity for the Australian economy, with platforms reshaping how work is performed and where value is created across industries. AI enables productivity growth through two primary mechanisms: the automation of existing labour-intensive activities and augmentation, which enhances the capability and effectiveness of workers across a wide range of occupations.6
We have conducted modelling using the EYGEM model to analyse the impact of AI on productivity and growth. We have approached the exercise by estimating a productivity shock which increases the efficiency with which the economy combines labour and capital, generating an increase in economy-wide productive capacity (see Technical Appendix below for methodology).
Using conservative estimates of AI-driven productivity enhancements, broadly consistent with analysis performed by the Productivity Commission7, EY-Parthenon modelling suggests that AI-driven enhancements to labour productivity are likely to stimulate economy-wide demand and lead to workforce reskilling.8 By 2036, it is estimated that AI adoption could deliver a 2.2 per cent increase in multifactor productivity under our baseline scenario. We have also modelled both a downside scenario, where AI productivity enhancements are 10 per cent lower than baseline, and an upside scenario, where AI productivity enhancements are 10 per cent higher than baseline. Under these scenarios we estimate that the increase in multifactor productivity by 2036 ranges from 2.0 per cent to 2.4 per cent.
With relatively high levels of technology penetration, Australia is well positioned to capture these benefits, supported by its stable investment environment, capital-intensive industry base, and capacity to support the expansion of energy and data-intensive infrastructure. Our analysis indicates that higher labour productivity may facilitate additional investment of between $31 billion and $38 billion over the coming decade, or the equivalent of a 3.2 per cent to 3.9 per cent uplift. This capital deepening boosts productive capacity and economic activity, lifting real GDP by between $95 billion (2.6 per cent) to $116 billion (3.2 per cent).
Despite this uplift, there would be a relatively small addition to the labour market: between approximately 36,000 to 44,000 additional full-time equivalent jobs, in net terms. Some jobs would be restructured or displaced, but new roles created elsewhere in the economy would more than offset those losses.
AI adoption is expected to reshape labour demand across industries. First, increased investment in AI-enabled capital, equipment and systems is likely to raise labour demand in investment-responsive industries such as construction. Second, productivity-driven gains in real wages and consumption are expected to lift demand for labour in service sectors, including wholesale and retail trade, transport and warehousing. Third, in capital-intensive industries such as mining and agriculture, greater automation and technological efficiency may reduce the number of workers required and lower costs, improving the international competitiveness of Australia’s exports.
Realising the economic benefits of AI will depend critically on workforce mobility and targeted reskilling to support a larger and reshaped economy.