ey-grocery-doorstep-delivery-home-entrance

Who wins the basket when AI does the shopping?

When AI automates the grocery shop, the battle for the basket will be won long before the checkout.

In brief

  • New EY Studio+ research suggests Australians are willing to let AI do more of the work while they decide what matters: less human touch, more human-centric shopping.
  • Grocery shoppers are likely to surrender decisions selectively: AI must prove its value, reduce effort and earn greater autonomy over time.
  • As AI gains influence over the basket, retailers and suppliers will need to compete for the agent’s attention as well as the shopper’s.

Today, shoppers choose the basket. Tomorrow, AI might.

What happens when shoppers no longer do the shopping? explores what happens when the decision-maker is partly machine.

Signals of AI appetite

72%
72%
of Australian grocery shoppers are comfortable with AI gathering prices, deals and product options.
49%
49%
are likely to use an AI tool that reliably sources their usual basket across multiple supermarkets.
58%
58%
of large online shoppers would hand over control to AI to complete purchases if it saved them up to 30 minutes per large online shop.
1 in 3
1 in 3
are somewhat comfortable with AI automatically reordering regularly purchased items without asking for confirmation.

These are early signals and attitudes are likely to evolve as shoppers gain experience with AI agents.

But the findings point to a new way of thinking about grocery shopping: less human touch, but more human-centric.

Permission has a price

Australian shoppers are willing to use AI to simplify grocery shopping, provided it delivers genuine value. But this willingness is not unconditional.

Shoppers are negotiating a value exchange. They expect AI to earn the right to make decisions on their behalf by delivering demonstrable benefits: lower prices, meaningful time savings, greater convenience and less mental effort. 

EY teams are working with retailers and suppliers to think deeply about how AI-powered shopping will influence customer strategy, technology, data, product, marketing and commercial models.
 

What happens when shoppers no longer do the shopping? translates some of that thinking into practical priorities for retailers and suppliers to consider: what to do now, what to prepare for next and what to keep in view beyond.

Who wins the basket when AI does the shopping?

The human behind the basket

The research gives us signals, rather than clear signposts.
 

Shoppers want AI to deliver value. They want to retain control while trust is being built. Routine, repeatable categories are easier to delegate. Younger and AI-familiar shoppers are likely to move earlier. And the existing fragmentation of grocery shopping gives AI a genuine problem to solve.
 

But we do not yet know how quickly assistance will become autonomy, or how that shift will play out across different shoppers, products, platforms and price tiers. We don’t know how agents will reshape logistics or commercial relationships between retailers and suppliers.
 

And perhaps most importantly, we don’t know where control and influence will sit when the decision-maker is partly machine.
 

As shoppers selectively hand over more decisions to AI, understanding the human benefiting from those decisions becomes more important, not less. When AI chooses what goes into the basket, businesses need to know who the basket is really for.

Join us for the AFGC webinar exploring findings from our EY Studio+ survey of 1,000 Australian adults on attitudes towards AI-assisted grocery shopping.


Talk to us about what the AI shopper wave means for your consumer strategy


About this article