EY refers to the global organization, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms of Ernst & Young Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Limited is a Swiss company with registered seats in Switzerland providing services to clients in Switzerland.
How EY can help
-
Discover how Integrated Finance Managed Services provide ambitious companies with the back office support they need to add value and accelerate growth.
Read more
What is driving the structural finance talent shortage?
The supply side is shrinking
The first shift is on the supply side, and it has been visible for longer than most organizations have been willing to admit. Accounting3 enrolments in universities have been declining across Europe and the United States for years. The number of candidates sitting for professional qualifications has fallen meaningfully in major markets. The image of the profession, fairly or not, has not kept pace with the way younger graduates think about careers, and competing fields (technology, consulting, sustainability, data) have proven more effective at recruitment.
At the same time, the experienced layer of the profession is retiring. The cohort of controllers, finance managers and group accountants who built their careers through ERP rollouts in the late 1990s and 2000s is moving on, and the institutional knowledge they hold is moving with them. The “missing middle” of finance, the professional with ten to fifteen years of experience, who has seen multiple closes, multiple system migrations and multiple regulatory cycles, is the scarcest profile on the market and arguably the most valuable.
Replacing this profile is not simply a question of paying more. It is a question of whether the experience is even available on the market in the relevant geographies and languages a multinational organization needs.
The demand side is expanding
While the supply of finance talent is contracting, demand for finance expertise is moving in the opposite direction. The expectations placed on a modern finance professional are dramatically broader than they were a decade ago.
A senior accountant in a multinational company today is expected to be fluent in IFRS and local GAAP, comfortable with at least one major ERP system, familiar with the consolidation and reporting toolchain, aware of transfer pricing implications, conversant in ESG data requirements, alert to e-invoicing and real-time reporting mandates in the jurisdictions the company operates and increasingly expected to engage with AI-enabled tools embedded in the close process. Each of these areas is an exacting discipline in its own right. Expecting one person to deliver on all fronts is a recipe for either generalist mediocrity or burnout.
Specialist depth, where it exists, is now concentrated in a small number of professionals who can command exceptional compensation. Group consolidation specialists with cross-border experience, IFRS technical experts with industry depth, transfer pricing professionals with documentation experience across multiple tax authorities, ESG reporting leads who can bridge sustainability data and audit-grade controls: each of these profiles is genuinely scarce.
The combination is mathematically uncomfortable. The supply of qualified finance professionals is contracting; the demands placed on each one are expanding. The market clears, but at a price most organizations did not budget for and at a pace most finance leaders find difficult to sustain.
How does the finance talent shortage impact operations?
The cost question that quietly compounds
The most visible consequence is compensation, though not in the way the headlines suggest. Aggregate wage growth in markets like Switzerland has actually been modest: nominal wages rose 1.8% in 2025, and with inflation near zero, real pay saw its strongest gain since 2009.¹ The pressure finance leaders feel is not the general wage index. It is concentrated at the specialist end of the market, where scarcity, not inflation, sets the price. Some 84% of employers say they will pay more for in-demand skills even as overall salary growth moderates, and technical accounting, audit and assurance roles are among the few projected to see above-average increases.² Retention bonuses, sign-on guarantees and stretched bands have become standard features of the conversation for exactly these profiles.
The less visible cost is the cost of churn. Every controller who leaves takes institutional knowledge with them: the quirk of an intercompany flow, the history of a particular reconciliation, the relationships with auditors and local statutory accountants. Rebuilding that knowledge in a new hire takes months, sometimes years, and the cost rarely appears on the line item where it actually lives.
There is also the cost of incomplete teams. A finance function operating with one or two key vacancies is not running at three quarters of its capacity; it is running at substantially less, because the missing capacity tends to be the supervisory or technical layer that enables everyone else to be effective. Close timelines slip. Controls deteriorate. The strategic agenda is the first thing to be deprioritized.
The implication: the in-house model has limits
For the largest multinationals with global mobility programs, robust internal training and the brand pull to attract top talent, building and retaining a fully self-sufficient finance function remains feasible, even though increasingly expensive. For everyone else, and that is most organizations, the arithmetic is changing.