Press release

15 Feb 2021

Budget to reinforce trend of tax enforcement, improved collections.

Rough road for taxpayers with audits as well as tougher enforcement.

Related topics Indirect Tax in Motion Tax
  • Rough road for taxpayers with audits with tougher enforcement
  • Corporate tax rate cuts sooner or later  

South Africa’s budget, which is to be presented in parliament on the 24th February, in unlikely to see the introduction of a wealth tax or any other significant tax increases, but rather further steps to ensure tax enforcement and collection.

Ekow Eghan, EY’s South Africa Tax Leader said, “The Budget trend since 2019 has mainly been to equip the South Africa Revenue Services (SARS) to enhance tax enforcement and improve tax collections. We do not anticipate a significant departure from this focus in this month’s budget”

Eghan added however that EY continues to be of the view that a phased-in reduction of corporate tax rates, however unpopular, could help drive South Africa’s trade, economic reform and competitiveness.

“The corporate tax rate cut is a matter of when. It is also particularly important in the wake of the pandemic to help corporate South Africa restore finances and by extension, reduce the risk of further job losses.”

On the topic of an introduction of a wealth tax, Eghan noted that while it appears politically attractive, the jury is out as to whether such a tax will achieve its objective better than other alternatives. A wealth tax that raises substantial tax revenues in an efficient manner should be welcome but only if that tax is also fair and difficult to avoid.

“Critically, because of the complexities in the design and administration of such a tax, it is not a policy direction SA should rush into without a wider public consultation process” he added.

He noted that despite a lack of clarity about how much additional enforcement capacity currently exists in SARS, some taxpayers can expect a more adversarial relationship with SARS as it pulls all the levers of its powers to enforce compliance to bridge the ‘tax gap.’

The tax gap is the difference between the true amount of taxes owed in any given tax year and the amount that is paid on time.

“We expect an uptick in audits plus a more rigorous application and interpretation of tax law. This will inevitably result in more disputes as compliance behaviour comes under the spotlight,” Eghan warned.

“Taxpayers should gear up for more regular ‘settlement’ negotiations with SARS as well as a greater willingness to go to court.”

He added that a poorly coordinated or overly aggressive enforcement program by SARS risked eroding the remaining trust and cooperation between compliant taxpayers and the tax administration.

Notes to Editors

About EY

EY is a global leader in assurance, tax, transaction and advisory services. The insights and quality services we deliver help build trust and confidence in the capital markets and in economies the world over. We develop outstanding leaders who team to deliver on our promises to all of our stakeholders. In so doing, we play a critical role in building a better working world for our people, for our clients and for our communities.

EY refers to the global organization, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients. Information about how EY collects and uses personal data and a description of the rights individuals have under data protection legislation is available via For more information about our organization, please visit

This news release has been issued by Ernst & Young Services (Pty) Limited, a member of the global EY organization


Samantha Crous

Digital, Media, PR and Communications Lead

Brand, Marketing and Communications 

+27 (0) 82 493 6335