EY refers to the global organisation, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients.
Recent Searches
Australia has made clear its ambitions for Defence transformation. The challenge now is delivering at speed.
In brief:
- Australia’s Defence strategy has undergone a seismic shift, but delivery systems designed for a different era may struggle to execute more complex, interconnected programs at speed and scale.
- The establishment of the Defence Delivery Agency (DDA) is an opportunity to build a delivery system that turns ambition into operational capability and strategic advantage.
- Success will depend on four outcomes: delivering at the speed of relevance, integrating capability delivery, building resilience and creating a strong digital backbone.
A good plan violently executed now is better than a perfect plan executed next week.
Australia's strategic circumstances have undergone a fundamental shift, characterised by intensifying competition, accelerating technological change, increasing supply-chain fragility and shrinking warning times. In response, the federal government has provided unprecedented strategic clarity and significant new investment. Together, the National Defence Strategy, Integrated Investment Program and AUKUS represent the most significant reorientation of Australian defence posture in generations.
The challenge now is execution. The establishment of the Defence Delivery Agency (DDA) reflects an important recognition that strategy alone does not generate capability. Military advantage is only realised when policy, investment, people, technology, industry and governance are successfully converted into operational effect. This means that delivery itself has become a strategic capability.
The DDA is therefore more than an organisational reform. It is an acknowledgement that Defence's future success will depend not simply on what capabilities it chooses to acquire, but on whether it can deliver those capabilities at the speed, scale and complexity the strategic environment demands.
The question confronting Defence is no longer whether it understands the challenge, it is whether its delivery system can keep pace with it.
Strategic ambitions are outpacing delivery systems
Long-range strike systems, integrated air and missile defence, autonomous systems, undersea warfare capabilities and AUKUS are not isolated projects, but complex, interconnected systems of capability. Delivering them on time and on budget requires an integrated approach bringing workforce, technology, industry, supply chains, data and international partnerships together.
Yet many of Defence’s delivery systems were designed for a different era – when warning times were longer, technology evolved more slowly and capability was delivered through relatively discrete projects rather than interconnected enterprise systems.
This mismatch creates an increasing risk that Australia’s strategic Defence ambitions may begin to outpace the delivery systems built to execute them. The National Defence Strategy seeks to close the gap, accelerating capability delivery, deepening partnerships with industry and allies, and creating a more agile and responsive Defence organisation. But key challenges remain:
- Accountability is fragmented across organisational boundaries.
- Governance systems often favour compliance over outcomes.
- Critical delivery skills remain scarce.
- Data is frequently dispersed across disconnected systems.
- Enterprise visibility is limited, hindering leaders’ ability to intervene early and decisively.
These challenges are not unique to Defence, but characteristic of large, complex organisations navigating disruption and accelerated change. The establishment of the DDA can help Defence overcome these problems but it presents a much bigger opportunity – to help Defence build a modern enterprise delivery system capable of generating strategic advantage through execution.
Four outcomes that will determine the DDA's success
Establishing the DDA is a positive starting point. But its real value will lie in its ability to achieve four interconnected outcomes that together enable Defence to deliver at speed and at scale.
1
Outcome 1:
Deliver capability at the speed of relevance
One of the most important shifts underway across Defence is the transition from valuing efficiency alone to valuing strategic speed. In a world of compressed warning times and rapid technological change, capability that arrives too slowly risks arriving after it is needed.
But strategic speed is not simply about moving faster. Instead, the DDA must support Defence in creating a delivery culture built around risk-informed decision-making, streamlined governance and empowered leadership. Assurance remains critical but proportionate to risk and designed to contribute to better outcomes rather than unnecessary delay.
This means leaders should be trusted to make decisions within clearly defined tolerances. Escalation should occur when required, not as a default response. Authority should sit as close as possible to delivery while accountability remains clear.
The ability to make informed decisions faster than competitors can adapt is essential to any modern organisation. The DDA can help make this a defining characteristic of Australia’s Defence delivery.
2
Outcome 2:
Move from projects to integrated capability delivery
Government does not invest in projects, but in military capability. Success is not measured simply by whether projects hit milestones but by whether these projects come together to achieve the desired operational effect.
The DDA's second challenge is therefore to shift Defence's focus beyond the success of individual programs toward the performance of the broader delivery system. This requires enterprise accountability across workforce, industry, capability managers, acquisition organisations, international partners and sustainment functions.
If the DDA can maintain alignment across these stakeholders, this shift from project delivery to integrated capability delivery may ultimately prove the Agency's most important contribution.
3
Outcome 3:
Create the capacity to adapt, recover and regenerate
Speed is important – but it’s insufficient without resilience. Successful delivery systems must be capable of continuing to operate under disruption, adapting to changing circumstances and regenerating capability when plans inevitably encounter setbacks.
This is where the DDA has an important role to play, bolstering the resilience of the Defence delivery ecosystem through improved workforce capacity, stronger industrial partnerships, better supply-chain visibility and more flexible delivery frameworks.
If realised as intended, the DDA will not just accelerate capability delivery but also ensure Defence can continue delivering capability under pressure. Resilience therefore becomes a delivery outcome in its own right.
4
Outcome 4:
Build an intelligent organisation for delivery excellence
Modern delivery systems depend upon trusted information and leading practice systems to enable their work in a consistent way. Yet many organisations continue to operate with bespoke, informal and disconnected systems, resulting in fragmented and inconsistent data at best and anecdotal data at worst. This means that fact-based decision-making and predictive analysis become high-risk endeavours. This lack of a unified view delays awareness of potential problems, creates inefficiencies, slows down decisions and means opportunities to intervene early are missed.
The DDA can champion an integrated, intelligent operating environment that connects delivery practices to delivery information across the enterprise. Connecting an intelligent information layer with portfolio management systems with scheduling environments, workforce information, industrial analytics and AI-enabled tools can support faster, more informed decision-making.
When Defence leaders can see emerging risks earlier and understand the consequences of different courses of action and intervene before issues become systemic, this can create a significant delivery advantage.
Build the leaders and workforce for the future of Defence
Underlying all four outcomes is a common enabler: people. But success will depend on more than simply having enough people. Defence must build a workforce with both the capacity and capability to execute. Capacity reflects the volume of effort available to Defence and its partners, while capability reflects the skills, qualifications and experience needed to deliver increasingly complex outcomes. The organisations that consistently outperform are not those with the best plans, but those that deliberately develop both.
Developing this workforce capacity and capability across Defence may be one of the DDA's most enduring contributions. But it will require reframing capabilities once seen as supporting functions, as strategic skills. The future of Defence will require specialists in program controls, systems engineering, integrated scheduling, industrial mobilisation, commercial delivery, portfolio management, digital engineering and advanced analytics.
Leadership within Defence must shift too. Defence leaders are used to change – most have experienced successive waves of reform over the past two decades. But the National Defence Strategy will fundamentally reshape how Defence generates, delivers, sustains and modernises capability. Its objective is not simply to improve existing systems, but to create a Defence enterprise capable of responding faster, adapting more effectively and generating capability under conditions of uncertainty and disruption.
This distinction matters because reform and transformation require different leadership approaches.
Achieving that outcome will require leaders who can think beyond organisational boundaries, embrace risk-informed decision-making, prioritise enterprise outcomes and sustain change across a complex national security ecosystem.
Delivery excellence as strategic advantage
Ultimately, the DDA should not be judged by the processes it establishes or the committees it creates but by whether it enables Defence to operate at the speed of relevance, generate capability faster, strengthen resilience under disruption and deliver the outcomes Government has directed.
In an era of strategic competition, technological acceleration and institutional strain, delivery excellence may prove to be Australia's most important Defence capability.
Summary
Australia’s Defence strategy raises both the stakes and the complexity of delivering programs of national importance. Meeting this challenge will require governments, industry and communities to work together at unprecedented scale and speed. Lessons from major infrastructure programs provide a practical framework for success, underscoring that sustained collaboration is the foundation for delivering long term national value.
Related articles
How can Defence effectively deliver the nation’s most complex programs?
Australia’s Defence strategy depends on whole‑of‑economy collaboration. Building future‑ready resilience will require coordinated action at speed and at scale.
Defence Supply Chain Resilience Insights Report
Is the Australian Defence industry ready to meet supply chain challenges on the horizon?
How reimagining the US submarine industrial base elevates new careers
Purpose, upskilling and coordination are key to the solution to reimagining the submarine industrial base workforce.