Two confident businessmen shaking hands while sitting with their colleagues at the office desk

How global mobility supports organizational resilience


Geopolitical disruption is reshaping mobility. Organizations need stronger governance, data and planning to deploy talent with confidence.


In brief

  • Geopolitical volatility is reshaping how organizations move talent and manage cross-border workforce risks.
  • A resilient global mobility strategy depends on governance, reliable data and early coordination across HR, tax, legal and risk teams.
  • Switzerland shows why immigration planning must go beyond procedural compliance and anticipate political and regulatory shifts.

Global mobility strategy is entering a new era defined by increasing administrative complexity and accelerating geopolitical volatility. Talent movement is now, more than ever, shaped by geopolitical tensions, economic security considerations, and increasingly protectionist migration frameworks across major economies. Immigration landscapes continue to rapidly evolve and add uncertainty to business operations.

Recent developments illustrate the speed at which the environment can shift. The escalation of tensions involving the United States, Israel and Iran has triggered disruptions across the Middle East and global travel networks, including travel cancellations, increased commodity price volatility, and supply-chain uncertainty for businesses operating across Europe, the Gulf and Asia. Such events have direct and immediate consequences for mobility: disrupted travel routes, interrupted visa processing and displaced workforce considerations. For multinational organizations, mobility has become part of a strategic risk management and agility capability, requiring foresight, scenario planning and real-time responsiveness.

At the same time, Europe is preparing for the possibility of renewed migration pressures linked to instability in the Middle East, recalling previous migration waves, and reinforcing the political sensitivity surrounding labor mobility and border management. Immigration systems are becoming more cautious, politically-charged, and more discretionary, with outcomes shaped by national populist and protectionist priorities.

The following sections examine these developments in greater detail, outlining the challenges currently affecting mobility functions, highlighting examples of how mobility considerations can align with broader organizational objectives when unplanned situations arise, and identifying practical measures that organizations may consider when preparing for evolving dynamics. Switzerland is used as an illustrative example of how these factors can manifest within an established immigration framework that involves a degree of interpretation at both federal and cantonal levels. Taken together, these observations provide reference points that organizations may draw on when considering how to adapt their mobility approaches in response to changing conditions.

The sections below present these themes through practical observations and examples, with a view to illustrating how mobility functions may contribute to organizational responsiveness and continuity in uncertain environments.

How is geopolitical uncertainty reshaping global mobility?

Over the past few years, geopolitical developments have become a defining factor in mobility planning and business resilience. Escalating regional instability, shifting alliances and sudden border disruptions influence where and how organizations can deploy their people. The pace of change is unprecedented, illustrated by nationality-based restrictions, abrupt shifts in long‑standing immigration practices, and a rise in unanticipated application refusals.

 

As a result, mobility functions must operate with far greater agility, regularly reassessing relocation strategies, identifying alternative candidates, and determining when virtual assignment structures are necessary. Our latest Mobility Reimagined Survey shows that slightly more than a third of mobility functions report they are very good at moving with speed, but they face major barriers in collaborating across functions, dealing with the complexity of their mobility programs and managing the complexity of their vendor ecosystems. A majority of functions (62%) say most of their time is spent on reactive tasks, meaning they are forced to defuse immediate requests without delving into higher-value strategic activities.

 

In particular, the expansion of remote work, hybrid deployment models, and distributed global teams has introduced additional layers of operational and regulatory complexity. Mobility leaders must now coordinate immigration, tax, social security, employment law, payroll and duty‑of‑care obligations across multiple jurisdictions and workforce segments. While recent OECD commentary provides greater clarity on impacts of virtual working for organizations on how working from home creates permanent establishments subject to corporate tax, the overall regulatory environment is trending towards increased complexity and fragmentation. The growing reliance on virtual and alternative deployment models in response to this volatility has, in turn, reshaped the operational realities faced by mobility teams.

 

This calls for stronger alignment between mobility, HR, legal, tax, and risk functions, supported by more structured governance and high data quality to track workforce distribution and compliance exposure. Organizations need to first understand their current state, determine what obligations their workforce creates, develop compliance strategies as well as raise awareness among business leaders and their mobile workforce on proactive and successful mitigation.

How can mobility teams prepare for geopolitical disruption?

Preparation is the cornerstone of successful response to unplanned surprises. Global mobility teams must co-develop robust frameworks that anticipate responses to potential geopolitical risks and establish clear actionable protocols. This means having the data, governance, and operational readiness required to make rapid, safe and compliant decisions when employees are impacted.

In practice, effective preparation relies on a set of core capability areas that enable mobility teams to move from awareness to action. The following considerations outline key elements that support timely response and informed decision making when unexpected events arise.

1. Risk Assessment and Monitoring: Global mobility must have access to accurate, trusted data to identify impacted workforce populations and assess compliance implications in real time:

  • Track geopolitical developments in all locations through official advisories, external intelligence and local networks.
  •  Maintain accurate location data and verified immigration/tax profiles to enable real-time compliance reviews during disruptive events.
  • Use automated alerts and tracking systems to enable individuals in sensitive jurisdictions to activate protocols quickly.
  • Establish capabilities that allow for real-time assessment of country specific compliance requirements that bring a clear understanding of the implications of potential relocations.

Accurate data ensures that mobility can give leadership immediate visibility into exposure, risks and possible actions.

2. Response Plans: Plans should outline how employees can be moved safely, quickly and compliantly during unexpected events.

  • Develop structured procedures for emergency moves, temporary remote arrangements and evacuation logistics.
  • Clarify roles and responsibilities across Mobility, HR, Legal, Risk and Security to prevent bottlenecks and ambiguity.
  • Designate authorized decisionmakers who are empowered to approve urgent exceptions.
  • Conduct simulation exercises to test processes, validate readiness and identify gaps.

Clear governance and pre-assigned authority enable fast and coordinated action.

3. Workforce Training and Communication: Organizations must educate their mobile workforce on risks and response procedures. Mobility and HR teams can support their workforce through:

  • Training on emergency actions, communication tools and available assistance.
  • Maintain two‑way communication channels (SMS, apps, hotline) for rapid outreach and status checks.
  • Develop ready‑to‑use documentation and templates that outline relocation procedures, safety guidance and documentation needs.

Strong communication reduces uncertainty and ensures individuals receive timely, actionable guidance. 

Taken together, these elements highlight the critical role of compliance expertise available to the mobility function. By supporting decisions that are both legally and operationally sound, mobility teams can provide rapid, well-informed responses to evolving situations while maintaining continuity of operations. Organizations should therefore assess whether they have sufficient internal capabilities to evaluate compliance requirements effectively, or whether leveraging dedicated technology or external providers would better support timely assessments and decision making.

How are immigration systems changing?

Alongside the need for greater agility and preparedness within organizations, broader shifts in immigration policy are reshaping the conditions under which global mobility operates.

As both advanced and emerging economies reassess the role of immigration within national agendas, factors such as labor market constraints, economic security concerns, political polarization and evolving public sentiment are prompting governments to recalibrate their approach to foreign talent. This is reflected in more demanding economic interest evaluations, tighter controls in sensitive sectors, and a growing emphasis on aligning immigration with broader policy objectives, including the protection of critical technologies, support for domestic employment and national competitiveness.

These changes have contributed to an increasingly fragmented regulatory environment. Jurisdictions that once offered predictable pathways have revised or reinterpreted their frameworks, often at different speeds and according to local priorities. For employers, this means that compliance for mobile employees is examined in greater depth. Authorities expect clearer justification of why a foreign professional is needed, how the role contributes to innovation or economic value, and why equivalent skills are not available locally.

As a result, application processing times have become more difficult to anticipate, and the success of applications depends on the coherence and persuasiveness of the business case. Anticipating potential concerns and preparing a clear narrative are essential. Mobility functions need to ensure they have a clear understanding of the technical and practical requirements, strong relationships with the local authorities, as well as the right mix of technical expertise in-house and through their vendor network to facilitate positive outcomes. Organizations that approach mobility in this way are better positioned to support business continuity within an increasingly complex immigration landscape.

What should organizations do next?

Switzerland provides a useful illustration of how immigration dynamics are evolving within jurisdictions traditionally perceived as stable. While the broader political environment remains generally supportive of economic openness, immigration continues to be a sensitive and closely monitored topic, shaped by periodic public debates and policy initiatives reflecting wider societal concerns.

This dynamic was illustrated by the popular vote of 14 June 2026 on limiting Switzerland's population to 10 million residents. Although the initiative was ultimately rejected by voters, the debate highlighted the continued political salience of immigration and population growth. It also reflects a broader pattern of recurring immigration-related initiatives in Switzerland, highlighting that immigration and population growth remain important topics in Swiss public and political debate.

For organizations moving talent into Switzerland, these dynamics mean that procedural compliance alone is not enough. Switzerland is often viewed as one of the most stable jurisdictions in the world – politically, economically and institutionally – and this perception naturally extends to its immigration system, which is commonly described as structured, well-regulated and predictable. On paper, this is true: the Federal Council sets annual quotas for non-EU specialists, the legal framework is well established, and the country has a long history of attracting highly skilled professionals.

In practice, however, the system operates with a significant degree of discretion, with substantive interpretation applied at both cantonal and federal levels. This creates a paradox: the framework appears predictable from the outside, yet it requires careful strategic preparation by employers. Successful applications depend on a clear and well-articulated narrative explaining why the role is essential, why the selected individual is uniquely qualified, and how the position aligns with the needs of the Swiss economy.

To navigate this evolving landscape effectively, organizations should consider the following actions:

  • Integrating immigration considerations early: Embed regulatory requirements into workforce planning from the start to preserve project viability and avoid unexpected delays or disruptions.
  • Enhancing the robustness of applications: Ensure submissions are not only compliant but also thoughtfully structured, with coherent arguments that reflect the expectations of reviewing authorities.
  • Leveraging in-country expertise: Draw on local insights to understand how regulations are applied in practice and to identify potential sensitivities across cantonal jurisdictions.
  • Designing adaptable mobility frameworks: Prepare alternative approaches (such as staggered start dates, interim remote solutions or temporary role adjustments) to manage potential variability in approval outcomes.
  • Tracking regulatory and political shifts: Maintain visibility over ongoing legislative discussions, proposed reforms and broader developments that may influence immigration regimes. Consider reliance on vendors for assessing federal and cantonal practices, analyzing trends across the country and reviewing key judicial decisions to anticipate potential changes in how cases may be evaluated.

Conclusion

Viewed collectively, the dynamics outlined above illustrate how global mobility is evolving beyond a strictly functional role, becoming central to how organizations anticipate risk and respond to disruption.

As global mobility is shaped by geopolitical shifts, regulatory divergence and operational volatility, organizations require models capable of adapting at speed. Agility in mobility is not about adding procedural complexity; it is about strengthening foresight, enhancing coordination and enabling rapid, well‑informed decisions. Mobility considerations should be integrated into workforce, risk and scenario planning from the outset, alongside monitoring geopolitical and regulatory developments, preparing contingency pathways ahead of disruptions and embedding flexibility into deployment strategies. When these elements are in place, organizations are better equipped to maintain business continuity, protect their workforce and pivot quickly as external conditions evolve.

At the same time, mobility decisions directly affect individuals and their families. The ability to respond effectively is therefore not only a matter of compliance and operational continuity, but also of providing clarity, stability and support to employees navigating uncertainty. Ultimately, the mobility functions that are most likely to succeed in this new environment are those that operate as strategic partners: anticipating change rather than reacting to it, informing leadership with timely insights and ensuring the business can continue to deploy critical talent as needed. In an interconnected and unpredictable world, agility in mobility is not optional – it is a core capability for organizational resilience.


Summary

Global mobility is becoming a core part of organizational resilience. As geopolitical and immigration dynamics evolve, organizations need stronger governance, clearer data and more flexible deployment models to maintain business continuity and support employees through uncertainty.

Acknowledgement

Many thanks to Jonathan Ouimet and Maria Avdija for their valuable contribution to this article.


FAQs

Related articles

What if building trust helped global mobility thrive at the speed of change?

Global workforce mobility functions must move talent at the speed of business. Learn why building a trust infrastructure can spur market momentum.


People and workforce

Our EY People Advisory Services professionals help you effectively harness your people agenda as part of an integrated business strategy. This can translate into competitive advantage by helping you get the right people, with the right capabilities, in the right place, for the right cost, doing the right things.

Brazil town from sky

About this article

Request for proposal (RFP) - exclusively for Switzerland

|

Submit your request now!