Why data is the starting point
Intelligent agents are only as good as the data they work with. And in healthcare, that data is often fragmented, inconsistent, and locked in formats that machines can’t easily interpret.
To enable clinical reasoning, automate workflows, or proactively guide patients, we need structured, semantically rich, and longitudinal data. Beyond diagnoses and timestamps, we need computable representations of clinical decisions, and outcomes.
This calls for a stronger data foundation that leads to:
- Adopting open, standardised data models (like openEHR and FHIR)
- Ensuring data is captured at the point of care in structured, machine-readable form
- Embedding clinical context and intent so agents can reason, not just react
Without this foundation, agentic systems will remain brittle and shallow—able to mimic, but not to fully support or collaborate.
Agentic systems across the health landscape
Most digital tools in healthcare record, alert, and report, but don’t shape or support the delivery of care in real time. Agentic systems are different. They can actively collaborate with clinicians, anticipating needs, adapting to context, and coordinating complex journeys across fragmented services.
That’s the potential of agentic systems: intelligent, personalised digital collaborators that operate throughout the health system and across the patient pathway.
If they deliver on this promise, hospitals themselves will look and feel different. Fewer keyboards and fewer screens. More listening, observing, and reasoning in the background. Agents will work together quietly and continuously—monitoring clinical encounters, tracking patient progress, and awaiting new results—so the human workforce can focus on people rather than processes.
Potential includes:
- Clinical agents: tailor support to individual clinician’s speciality, style, and workflow. A cardiologist sees different alerts than a GP; a junior doctor receives different prompts than a senior consultant.
- Operational agents: learn from demand, local capacity, and clinician preferences to make context-sensitive decisions in real time. They can collaborate across organisational boundaries to align care plans, coordinate referrals, and reconcile information.
- Patient-facing agents: personalise advice using clinical history, genetic profile, learning style, and even social circumstances—turning one-size-fits-none interventions into precision-guided support.
- Population-level agents: draw on real-world evidence, predictive models, and public health data to drive targeted outreach and early interventions.
This level of personalisation sets agentic systems apart from the rules-based automation of the past. They can adjust their behaviour based on who they’re helping, what’s needed, and what’s known.
With this context, interventions become more relevant. Alerts are more meaningful. Care is more continuous. And both clinicians and patients experience a system that seems to understand them, not just process them.