1. Transform business models
While business model disruption is nothing new, the ways in which companies develop new business models will change to be better aligned with the NAVI world.
First, in a business climate that is increasingly interconnected, new business models will succeed by harnessing the power of connections. One example of this is combining multiple emerging technologies, which can deliver breakthrough offerings that are more than the sum of the parts. A new crop of AgTech startups, including Carbon Robotics, FarmDroid, and FarmWise, is developing automated weeders that combine technologies such as AI, robotics, computer vision, and lasers to make weed control autonomous, precise and chemical-free — with considerable implications for the economics and business model of organic farming.
A methodology known as future mapping can be a critical capability here. “Future mapping is a structured way of illuminating the first-, second- and third-order effects of potential trends and developments,” says Minsoo Pak, EY Transformation Architect and Strategic Futurist. “Thinking through ‘implications of implications’ allows us to think in scenarios and better plan for future events — a powerful tool in business model innovation.”
Second, adopting a portfolio approach — developing multiple business models simultaneously — gives companies increased resilience amid increased volatility, and allows them to be prepared for multiple versions of the future. Singapore-based Grab, for instance, has multiple market offerings and business models, from ride-hailing and food delivery to digital payments, and is expanding into financial services such as lending and insurance.
Third, business model innovation needs more than ever to be ongoing and continuous. One example of this is Volkswagen Group’s “AI Lab,” focused on developing disruptive offerings powered by AI. The AI Lab serves as a global hub for innovation, identifying new product ideas and collaborating with multiple technology partners to develop and explore a range of disruptive offerings.
2. Transform operating models
Companies will thrive by restructuring their operating models. The first step is rethinking legacy business processes and functions and recasting them to be better aligned with AI and other disruptive trends. Moderna, for instance, has appointed its first-ever Chief People and Digital Technology Officer, charged with managing “3,000 AI’s and 5,800 humans.”3
Companies will also reshape their operating models to be more nimble and agile in a NAVI world. This includes reshaping organizational structures around smaller teams, with the goal of building flat networks rather than hierarchical trees. It involves reengineering talent models, information flows, business processes, and business functions — to enable the deployment of AI across the enterprise, as well as create organizational structures that are more adaptive and nimble. Critically, it requires rethinking incentive structures and performance metrics to enable these changes.
Over time, these and other shifts will fundamentally transform the enterprise as we know it, with the ultimate destination being the frictionless organization we refer to as the “superfluid enterprise.”
3. Transform risk management
Risk management, as currently practiced in most companies, is fundamentally misaligned with the NAVI world. In a time of accelerating change and increased volatility, risk management relies on slow and intermittent processes. In a world of increased interconnectivity, it is both siloed across the enterprise and inclined to manage risks as independent, rather than interconnected, forces. In an environment of nonlinear change, it has been slow to adopt methodologies suited to modeling and managing nonlinearity.
One indicator of the large gap between standard risk management practices and the challenges of the NAVI risk climate is that it is still rare for even the world’s largest companies to have something as basic as a Chief Risk Officer (CRO) in the C-suite. EY analysis of the Fortune Global 500 companies reveals that just one in five companies (21%) has a CRO. These numbers are skewed by financial services firms, 80% of which have CROs, largely because of their unique risk management regulations. Among non-financial sector entities, only 12% of the world’s largest companies have CROs.
“The need to transform risk management has never been greater,” says Scott McCowan, EY Global Consulting Risk Markets Leader. “Despite an environment of increasing risk and uncertainty, much of risk management remains siloed and slow to change. This will no longer suffice. In today’s volatile environment, risk management is not a compliance exercise — it’s strategy.”
Indeed, aligning risk management with the NAVI world requires comprehensive transformation. This includes practices such as Integrated Risk Management (IRM) and Enterprise Risk Management (ERM), which are well-suited for developing a more holistic and strategic view of risk, but which — as with CRO appointments — have not been adopted by most companies. Risk transformation includes reshaping organizational structures and operating models to make risk management pervasive across the enterprise. It involves adopting technologies and methods more suited to analyzing risk in a NAVI world — from AI to tabletop exercises and Monte Carlo simulations.
In a NAVI environment, risk and strategy need to be integrated as never before. Beyond the minimal step of appointing a CRO, companies will succeed by elevating the role of CROs, giving them an equal voice in key strategic decisions. This would ideally be supplemented with initiatives to restructure incentives, so that risk management professionals are rewarded for striking an appropriate balance between upside and downside, rather than just limiting downside.
4. Transform transformation
Major transformations have traditionally been years-long exercises. But how do you chart a steady course over such a long time frame in an environment where new surprises and tipping points could suddenly emerge to upend your strategic plans, assumptions and cost-benefit calculations?
The answer, according to Craig Glindemann, EY Global Consulting Markets Leader, is to rethink the traditional approach to transformation.
“An environment of accelerating change and growing volatility is transforming transformation into something more fluid, flexible and adaptive to changing market conditions,” says Glindemann. “Instead of a linear process with a neat beginning, middle and end, transformation is becoming more nonlinear, iterative and continuous. And the days of two-to-three-year planning cycles are over. The new reality is one in which planning horizons have shrunk to months, not years.”