EY refers to the global organization, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients.
How EY can help
-
Explore our global insights that look at how you can build confidence in AI, drive exponential value throughout your organization and deliver positive human impact. Learn more.
Read more
Q. Agentic AI is dominating industry discussions. What sets it apart from traditional AI?
A. Agentic AI is often used interchangeably with GenAI or chatbots in market conversations, but they are not synonymous. While GenAI represents a technological advancement within the broader AI realm, agentic AI embodies a conceptual shift in how we apply, perceive and interact with AI systems. This shift is more about a change in mindset rather than a direct technological evolution.
Traditional AI, often referred to as Good Old-Fashioned AI (GOFAI), operates with well-defined inputs and outputs, serving specific, narrow purposes. For example, a model predicting house prices takes a prescribed set of inputs such as property size, location, and number of bedrooms, and produces a predictable output: a single numeric value. Similarly, a customer churn model requires a defined set of data and returns a focused output such as a churn probability expressed as a percentage.
In contrast, GenAI can handle unpredictable inputs and generate varied outputs. This flexibility makes it appear more human like, creating the impression of an agent that acts like an employee — capable of taking initiative and applying reasoning to achieve objectives.
However, not all GenAI systems are agentic. The key distinction lies in the ownership of objectives within a process. Traditionally, human workers have been the primary decision makers and initiative takers, guiding tasks and processes with AI serving as a supportive tool for automation and augmentation. In agentic AI systems, this dynamic shifts: the AI assumes ownership of objectives, making decisions and executing tasks autonomously while still recognising when to seek assistance from human counterparts. This represents a fundamental evolution in the role of AI within organisational processes.