Across Europe, defense organizations are modernizing faster than at any point in recent history. New capabilities, digital tools and new ways of working are being introduced at high speed. Yet one constraint continues to limit readiness: people.
In Belgium, Defense needs to recruit hundreds of specialists in areas such as cyber, data, engineering, logistics and emerging technologies. Across the land, air, naval and support forces combined, this represents thousands of roles over time. These profiles are not unique to Defense. They are the same scarce profiles sought by private companies, in a labor market that is already tight and highly competitive.
This means the challenge goes far beyond hiring alone. It is a workforce transformation challenge. Defense needs to rethink how work is organized, how military and civilian roles complement each other, and how it works with industry, education and the wider labor market. It also requires a clearer social contract: shared expectations around careers, skills development, flexibility and long‑term commitment.
From employer to societal anchor
Part of the challenge is cultural. Many Western European countries still operate with a “peace dividend mindset”, where Defense is viewed as just another employer rather than an anchor of societal resilience.
Other nations offer a different perspective. In the Baltic and Nordic regions, a culture of shared responsibility ensures that national security is not exclusively the task of Defense institutions. Industry, universities, technology ecosystems and citizens all contribute to a broader security fabric. This societal engagement accelerates recruitment, strengthens the reserve, and reinforces trust in institutions.
Belgium is beginning to move in that direction. Outreach to young people and voluntary entry paths are generating strong interest, with several candidates for many vacancies. However, a major challenge quickly follows recruitment. Many people leave within the first 12 to 18 months. These early departures have emerged as one of the biggest struggles.
People often join with strong motivation and a sense of purpose but leave when expectations do not match reality. Retention depends less on pay and more on very practical factors: clarity about roles, predictable schedules, manageable workload, good leadership during training, visible career paths and some stability in location. Keeping people once they have joined therefore requires better selection for fit, strong early‑career leadership, and high‑quality instruction that helps people feel confident and connected to the mission.