EY refers to the global organization, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients.
How EY can help
-
Our Government & Public Sector community brings together more than 20,000 EY people from over 100 countries. All of us share a passion to help governments work better for their people.
Read more
Think longer term to achieve sustainable fiscal balance
Much of the concern with the cost of growth is related to initial investments in infrastructure. But the ongoing cost of infrastructure maintenance and municipal services should be of equal concern. But thinking about this question over the long term doesn’t have to be daunting. Done right, considering these ongoing operational costs as part of a proactive planning process can help municipalities identify ways to create a plan for sustainable fiscal balance.
How so?
Inefficient development patterns — like low-density and greenfield subdivisions — mean municipalities must spend more on land, infrastructure and services to provide housing. More efficient land uses such as infill, mixed use and higher density can lower both immediate and ongoing spending. Efficient land use can also bring in more tax revenue via a higher density of households or mixed uses, such as retail and commercial. That’s because higher density near existing infrastructure and amenities is more economically efficient.
But, with few exceptions, development charges, taxes and fees are generally the same regardless of how economically efficient a community is and how much it costs the municipality to service them. This challenges many municipalities’ ability to pay for basic responsibilities, from road maintenance to snow clearing to police and fire response, social services and community amenities.