EY refers to the global organization, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients.
Recent Searches
Tax Alert 2024 No. 46, 5 September 2024
The Department of Finance released several packages of draft legislative proposals for public comment on 12 August 2024, including draft legislative proposals relating to the Global Minimum Tax Act (GMTA). The proposals reflect additional administrative guidance released by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (e.g., on securitization entities), implement the undertaxed profits rule (UTPR) and make a consequential amendment to the Income Tax Conventions Interpretation Act relating to the application of the GMTA.
In this Tax Alert, we provide a brief overview of certain measures included in this package of draft legislative proposals. Interested parties are invited to provide comments to the Department of Finance on the draft legislative proposals by 11 September 2024.
For more information on the other draft legislative proposals released on 12 August 2024, refer to EY Tax Alert 2024 Issue No. 42, Finance releases draft legislation for 2024 budget and other measures, and EY Tax Alert 2024 Issue No. 45, Finance releases revised legislative details to implement changes to increase the capital gains inclusion rate.
Undertaxed profits rule
The GMTA, as enacted before the summer break, did not contain any references to the UTPR.
The UTPR is the third element of the Pillar Two global anti–base erosion (GloBE) model rules, operating as a backstop to the income inclusion rule (implemented in Canada as the “Global Minimum Tax”) and the qualified domestic minimum top-up tax (QDMTT, also included in the GMTA). Broadly, the UTPR requires a taxpayer to pay top-up tax relating to low-taxed profit of any group entity if it has not been already subject to an income inclusion rule. The UTPR liability is reduced by the amount of QDMTT paid on the low-taxed profit.
The draft legislative proposals introduce Part 2.1 in the GMTA, titled UTPR. Part 2.1 broadly aligns with the OECD Model Rules, allocating to Canadian taxpayers a certain amount of top-up tax, based on a ratio of substance of the Canadian entities, compared to the substance of other entities of the group operating in jurisdictions that have a UTPR. The UTPR would operate through a new levy.
The UTPR proposals also contain specific transitional rules — one relating to the initial phase of international activity to ensure that groups with limited foreign presence would not be subject to the UTPR, and a second rule to prevent the application of the UTPR to the ultimate parent entity jurisdiction if that jurisdiction’s statutory corporate income tax rate is equal to or greater than 20%. This second rule is particularly relevant for US multinational enterprise (MNE) groups with inbound activity into Canada, as the US does not have a QDMTT.
The UTPR is to enter into effect for financial years commencing on or after 31 December 2024, which is one year after the entry into effect of the Global Minimum Tax and the QDMTT in Canada.
Other measures
The draft legislative proposals also include a number of modifications, which are intended to reflect certain items from the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework’s fourth Additional Administrative Guidance, which was released on 17 June 2024.1
Securitization entity
Broadly speaking, in a typical securitization transaction, assets like loans or mortgages are transferred from the creditor (the originator) to a special purpose vehicle (SPV) or multiple SPVs, which could be a corporation, trust or similar arrangement. Where the SPV is a corporation, it is often owned by an unconnected third party. The corporation typically issues debt instruments on the bond market to finance the asset pool acquisition or enters into a synthetic securitization transaction in which the SPV becomes party to a derivative contract or guarantee and assumes the risk of the underlying asset pool’s performance, while also owning highly secured assets, such as government debt. The SPV’s asset pool (and/or derivatives or other instruments) generates income to service the debt. Any excess is returned to the originator or related entity through a defined cash-extraction mechanism, under which payments are commonly made on a monthly or quarterly basis so surplus cash is typically not retained in the SPV for a significant period of time.
The SPV structure ensures bankruptcy remoteness from the originator and isolates the risk of the asset pool from the wider credit risk associated with the originator.
While there are only limited situations where such vehicles would raise Pillar Two issues, such entities in scope of the rules could potentially be adversely impacted, undermining securitization transactions, the solvency of the entity, as well as its credit rating.
To address the issue, the OECD provided countries with the ability to exclude these entities from the scope of the QDMTT and the UTPR, which Canada opted to do.
Flow-through entities
Notably, the draft legislative proposals repeal the definition of reverse hybrid entity from the GMTA, as it is no longer referenced within the GMTA, and the revised drafting of subsection 17(6) no longer requires this concept to operate.
In addition, part of subsection 17(6) of the GMTA — relating to flow-through entities — is replaced to better align to the latest Additional Administrative Guidance from the OECD on flow-through entities.
Deferred tax assets
A specific regime applies to intragroup transfers of assets occurring before the GloBE rules apply to a specific jurisdiction, providing that any step-up realized (or deferred tax asset recorded) through this transaction would be ignored for GloBE purposes (Article 9.1.3 of the OECD Model Rules), unless taxes are paid, or a valuable tax attribute is used. In this latter case, a GloBE-only deferred tax asset would be recognized to take this into consideration.
The draft legislative proposals aim to further align subparagraph 48(5)(b)(ii) of the GMTA to the latest amendments adopted by the OECD to the Commentary in Article 9.1.3., ensuring that (i) a deferred tax asset can be recognized for GloBE purposes even if no deferred tax asset is recognized under the MNE group’s accounting standard, (ii) in situations where a group taxation regime applies, the amount of taxes paid by an entity other than the transferor of the assets is taken into account when determining the amount of the deferred tax asset authorized and, finally, (iii) where a deferred tax asset is reversed — or never arises — further to the transfer, that amount is also taken into account when determining the authorized deferred tax asset amount.
Income Tax Conventions Interpretation Act
The draft legislative proposals also include new section 4.4 to the Income Tax Conventions Interpretation Act, clarifying that Canada’s tax treaties do not prevent the taxation of income in accordance with the GMTA, nor do they require Canada to provide relief, such as tax credits, for tax imposed under another state’s Pillar Two implementing legislation.
Proposed section 4.4 is to enter into effect as from 1 January 2024.
What’s next
The draft GMTA legislative proposals will now continue to advance in the legislative process.
As further OECD guidance is anticipated, we should expect the GMTA to continue to require amendments in the future to remain aligned to the global framework.
Learn more
For more information, contact your EY or EY Law tax advisor, or one of the following professionals:
Toronto
Linda Tang
+1 416 943 3421 | linda.y.tang@ca.ey.com
Elena Doucette
+1 416 943 3193 | elena.doucette@ca.ey.com
Jeremy Shnaider
+1 416 943 2657 | jeremy.shnaider@ca.ey.com
Leslie Ivany
+1 416 943 4595 | leslie.a.ivany@ca.ey.com
Mark Kaplan
+1 416 943 3507 | mark.kaplan@ca.ey.com
Nicholas Tsai
+1 416 943 2783 | nicholas.n.tsai@ca.ey.com
Terri McDowell
+1 416 943 2767 | terri.mcdowell@ca.ey.com
Trevor O’Brien
+1 416 943 5435 | trevor.obrien@ca.ey.com
Vince Raimondo
+1 416 943 3282 | vince.raimondo@ca.ey.com
Ottawa
Darrell Bontes
+1 613 598 4864 | darrell.bontes@ca.ey.com
Rene Fleming
+1 613 598 4406 | rene.fleming@ca.ey.com
Quebec and Atlantic Canada
Albert Anelli
+1 514 874 4403 | albert.anelli@ca.ey.com
Angelo Nikolakakis
+1 514 879 2862 | angelo.nikolakakis@ca.ey.com
Brian Mustard
+1 514 887 5521 | brian.mustard@ca.ey.com
Jean-Charles van Heurck
+1 514 490 0264 | jean-charles.van.heurck2@ca.ey.com
Joannie Ethier
+1 514 879 2718 | joannie.ethier@ca.ey.com
Nicolas Legault
+1 514 874 4404 | nicolas.legault@ca.ey.com
Nik Diksic
+1 514 879 6537 | nik.diksic@ca.ey.com
Philippe-Antoine Morin
+1 514 874 4635 | philippe-antoine.morin@ca.ey.com
Stéphanie Jean
+1 514 879 8047 | stephanie.jean@ca.ey.com
Prairies
Liza Mathew
+1 403 206 5663 | liza.mathew@ca.ey.com
Mark Coleman
+1 403 206 5147 | mark.coleman@ca.ey.com
Robert Lee
+1 403 206 5326 | robert.lee@ca.ey.com
Vancouver
Eric Bretsen
+1 604 899 3578 | eric.r.bretsen@ca.ey.com
Ilia Korkh
+1 604 891 8359 | ilia.korkh@ca.ey.com
-------------------------------------------
- For more information, refer to OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework releases fourth tranche of Administrative Guidance on Pillar Two GloBE Rules.
Download this tax alert
Budget information: For up-to-date information on the federal, provincial and territorial budgets, visit ey.com/ca/Budget.