EY refers to the global organization, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients.
How EY can help
-
Our learning and development consulting services team can help you develop a cohesive strategy that includes the seamless transfer of knowledge. Learn more.
Read more
Different folks learn differently, and it matters
When it comes to learning, it’s not enough to simply provide access to training. Employees are looking for a much more personalized learning and development experience, one that accounts for generational, sector and other nuances.
For example, Gen Z and Millennial employees tend to seek fast skill pivots that allow them to pursue different career pathways and cultivate career mobility. Gen X Canadians, however, emerges as the most time constrained and least positive about current learning programs, with only 10% rating them as excellent and just 10% strongly agreeing they have sufficient time for learning.
By contrast, Baby Boomers want relevance and simplicity in their learning, with clear applicability to daily tasks. Boomers also led in confidence — 37% strongly agree their skills remain relevant — but show the lowest urgency for new learning at 14%.
These nuances underscore the need for tailored strategies: digital and confidence-building for Gen Z and Millennials, practical and time-efficient learning for Gen X and mentoring opportunities for Boomers.
Beyond generational distinctions, sector dynamics reveal meaningful differences in how employees experience and respond to changing skill requirements. While 65% to 70% of employees across sectors say evolving skill demands result in moderate to major impact, some sectors appear better positioned than others. Employees in energy and natural resources report the highest confidence (85%) in keeping up with evolving responsibilities and job needs, with technology employees also relatively strong at 69%.
Government and public sector employees sit between these extremes. They report solid confidence in their ability to keep up (64%), alongside a comparatively lower-than-average perceived disruption from changing skill requirements. This combination suggests a steadier — though potentially less urgent — response to skill change.
By contrast, only 36% of consumer products employees feel they have the skills needed to keep up, highlighting a stark gap between sectors that feel resilient and those at greater risk of falling behind.
Job experience reinforces this divide: just 24% of consumer products employees feel their work develops their skills, compared with 72% in energy and natural resources.
One-size-fits-all learning creates real risk. Where confidence isn’t reinforced by sustained learning momentum or a clear understanding of evolving skill demands, it can mask emerging capability gaps.
At the other extreme, persistently low confidence and limited job experience can erode engagement and heighten attrition risk.
Tailored learning and development — aligned to distinct workforce segments and linked to career and pay progression — can help close these gaps, especially in low-motivation sectors.
Sales employees, for example, face the steepest skill-disruption — 34% report a major impact — yet have the lowest confidence and limited access to job-embedded learning.
Other groups require different solutions. Knowledge workers are motivated but need learning better integrated into daily work, along with protected time to pursue it. Essential workers value onsite, practical training but remain consistently time constrained.