Footbridge in an Asian big city

Why regulators are zooming in on private credit

Regulators are paying closer attention to private credit’s risks, interconnections and transparency gaps.


In brief
  • Private credit’s rapid growth and deep financial links are increasing regulatory scrutiny worldwide.
  • Recent defaults, valuation volatility and redemption pressure have sharpened regulatory concerns over risk management.
  • Firms should strengthen data, governance, liquidity and investor transparency in response.

Private credit has grown rapidly over the past two decades, expanding from a relatively niche market to a significant source of financing for corporates globally. As highlighted in our latest report, Private credit in focus: Observations on the FSB's report (pdf), estimates suggest its growth reached US$2.3 trillion by the end of 2025,1 with forecasts suggesting the market will top US$4 trillion by 2030.2 As the sector has grown in scale and importance, regulators have sought to better understand the implications of potential stresses within the market.

A key area of regulatory interest is the increasing interconnectedness of private credit with other parts of the financial sector. As participation in the asset class broadens, regulators are monitoring the potential channels through which stresses in private credit markets could interact with banks, insurers, pension funds, investment funds, and retail investors. 

Regulators move to a proactive stance

The growth of private credit has prompted regulators to move from a watching brief to a more active stance. Recent market developments have increased regulatory attention on areas such as underwriting practices, collateral quality, valuation methodologies, sector concentrations, and liquidity management.

In parallel, regulators are continuing to assess how private credit portfolios may perform under changing economic conditions and whether existing governance, risk management and disclosure practices remain appropriate as the sector matures. 

Regulators have paid particular attention to semi-liquid fund structures that provide periodic redemption opportunities while investing in relatively illiquid assets. Periods of elevated redemption activity have highlighted the importance of robust liquidity management frameworks and clear investor communication regarding the liquidity characteristics and risk profile of such products.

Focus areas: systemic issues

Transparency remains a central theme in the regulatory discussion. Regulators continue to evaluate whether they have access to sufficient data to assess market trends, leverage, concentrations and interconnections across the private credit ecosystem. 

 

The Financial Stability Board (FSB) has recently proposed a core set of metrics to enable more consistent monitoring across jurisdictions.3 This is a likely prelude to strengthened reporting requirements to support a more comprehensive understanding of the sector’s evolution and risk profile.

 

Related-party conflicts are also attracting increased attention and have moved up the regulators’ agenda. As relationships between private credit managers, private equity firms, and insurance companies continue to evolve, regulators are assessing how firms manage potential conflicts of interest and concentrations arising from related party-arrangements.

Focus areas: risk management

Regulators have also identified a range of operational and risk management considerations relevant to the sector, including credit risk, liquidity management and valuation practices.

An important and economically beneficial area of private credit growth since the Global Financial Crisis has been lending to smaller companies, many of which are backed by private equity sponsors and may fall outside traditional bank lending appetites. As the market expands, regulators are examining whether risk management frameworks remain appropriate for the nature and complexity of these exposures. Supervisors are also reviewing features such as payment in kind (PIK) interest, where interest is added to the principal rather than paid in cash, to better understand the implications for borrower monitoring and loss recognition.

Valuation practices, particularly model-driven approaches used for less liquid assets, are another area of regulatory focus, as are, liquidity management arrangements in semi-liquid retail funds. Regulators are also monitoring sector concentrations within private credit portfolios, including exposures such as software, where private equity activity has been particularly strong. 

Private credit in focus: Observations on the FSB’s report

What’s driving regulatory expectations and how firms can respond?

How regulators are responding

While approaches vary across jurisdictions globally, a common theme is increasing supervisory engagement with private credit markets and greater emphasis on transparency and data availability. Authorities are also examining the implications of market interconnectedness and, in some cases, conducting stress-testing exercises to better understand potential transmission channels during periods of market stress. The Bank of England has taken a lead in stress-testing the systemic interconnectedness of private credit markets. The European Union's Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD) II has introduced harmonized leverage caps and expanded transparency requirements and Australia’s Securities and Exchange Commission has published supervisory expectations following its review of private credit funds.

Considerations for firms in light of regulatory scrutiny of private credit.

In response, firms should consider the following actions:

  • Prioritizing data quality and availability in anticipation of a push by regulators for greater disclosure and transparency.
  • Strengthening governance and risk management frameworks, especially around related-party transactions, valuations and loan workouts.
  • Reviewing - liquidity management processes, especially for retail products, including contingency funding to manage ‘gating’ of funds.
  • Ensuring investor communications clearly explain the risks, liquidity features and investment horizons associated with private credit products.
  • For insurers, periodically reviewing private credit exposures ratings, covenants and underwriting assumptions.
  • For banks, maintaining a comprehensive view of exposures to private credit managers across product and business lines to better understand overall interconnectedness.
  • For institutional investors, conducting ongoing due diligence on managers, with particular focus on governance, risk management and valuation practices.

Conclusion

Private credit has become an important component of corporate lending markets, complementing bank lending and public capital markets. Regulators generally recognize the role it plays in broadening financing options for borrowers and expanding investment opportunities. At the same, the sector’s growth and increasing integration with the wider financial system are prompting closer supervisory attention to issues such as transparency, risk management, investor protection and financial stability. The FSB’s recently proposed framework for enhanced transparency and oversight represents an unambiguous step towards enhanced disclosures and, ultimately, more active supervision.

The sector can use these regulatory concerns as a catalyst for proactive upgrading of risk management and reporting capabilities. Engaging with openness and co-operation – and acting to strengthen trust and resilience – will allow private credit to secure the foundation it needs to keep growing.

Mike Gibson, EY Americas Financial Services Regulatory Lead, Executive Director, US Financial Services Consulting, Ernst & Young LLP also contributed to this article.


Summary

Private credit now plays a bigger role in global lending, but its scale, complexity and growing ties to mainstream finance are drawing closer regulatory attention. Firms that improve transparency, governance and liquidity oversight will be better prepared for more active supervision.

Related articles

Private Equity Pulse: key takeaways from Q1 2026

The PE Pulse is a quarterly report that provides data and insights on private equity market activity and trends. Read the latest report.

Three strategic priorities for banking CROs in 2026

The EY/IIF bank risk management survey highlights the need for increased agility against diversifying risks. Find out more.

Four regulatory shifts financial firms must watch in 2026

Our Global Financial Services Regulatory Outlook has four regulatory priorities to drive financial institutions' focus in 2026. Download the report.

About this article

Authors

Contributors