Access insights on the key aspects that the wealthy in India need to think about for a smooth and an effective transition of wealth from one generation to another.
Ultra-high net worth Individuals (‘UHNIs’) are expected to grow by 73% over next five years. With the history of large family business houses operating in India, especially post liberalisation, and emergence of a new class of entrepreneurial HNIs, there is an increased need for succession planning more now than ever before.
If Indian corporate history is anything to go by, large business groups have either seen their businesses split through murky battles of succession issues (often in the public eye), or very rarely through a muted and amicable succession planned through a structured approach.
Troubled succession plans, even when resolved can lead to a pyrrhic victory with the bone of contention - i.e. prized family businesses - suffering almost in an irrecoverable manner while the resolution plays out. Therefore, it is extremely important that the aspect of succession planning is not acted on through some rite of passage but an actively thought through endeavour.
Multiple set of dynamic factors are at play in such an endeavour, which include complex inter-generational relationships, entangled ownership structures, diverse businesses, retaining control, managing dispute, overseas residency, citizenship issues and tax matters. Devising an efficient succession structure which addresses all these aspects, without compromising on business continuity therefore plays a vital role.
In this article, we have focused to shed some light on some of the key aspects to be considered and evaluated for a smooth and an effective transition of wealth from one generation to another.
Broadly, the decision making matrix would include the following categories:
- Strategic consideration
- Succession law in India
- Indian exchange control regulation
The role and importance of each category in an effective succession planning have been briefly discussed in this article.
1. Strategic consideration
While considering succession options, the following aspects play an important role in decision making:
- Choice of structure [Will or Partnership/ LLP or Trust] plays a vital role in effective succession planning.
- A will involves the declaration of a person’s wishes regarding the disposal of his estate post his death. The peculiar feature of a will is that it takes effect only upon the death of the testator.
- While a partnership firm is more of a legal structure to hold assets and run businesses, many families have used partnerships to keep the family members together in joint family business. The deed of partnership which defines the rights, obligations and relations inter se the partners, usually contains provisions relating to death of partners and how their share of partnership is dealt with. However, while the legal heirs of a deceased partner are entitled to his share (including share of goodwill) in the firm, they are not automatically entitled to be inducted into the partnership, without the consent of all the other remaining partners.
- A trust, especially a discretionary one, offers more flexibility as compared to a Will or Partnership structure.
- For example, a Trust allows to provide appropriate benefits to different family members at different points in time, taking into account changing necessities, opportunities, etc., and also taking into account contributions made by such members for the well-being of the family and for the growth of family businesses (if any);
- Further, in the context of business succession, it allows flexibility to take various factors into account in determining how change in management should be effected and how management responsibilities should be divided among family members and independent professionals (if contemplated).
- A trust structure offers several advantages, not the least of which is ring fencing of assets against possible losses due to business liabilities, family related liabilities arising out of divorce, maintenance claims, tax claims, re-introduction of estate duty in India, and / or actual or potential creditors.
Engaging external and independent persons
- Considering the risk that any family member or friend may tend to become biased in favour of / against some family members, there may be a preference to appoint an unbiased independent person for acting as the executor (in case of a Will), as the trustee (in case of trust), etc.
- Of late, there has been a steady growth in institutions providing such services. Depending on the objective and nature of discretion required to be exercised by the executor, trustee, etc., and on cost-benefit analysis, one may consider appointing such service providers.
Degree of control
- The decision on whether or not and the extent to which one wishes to exercise control over one’s property is often an important factor. For persons who wish to retain absolute control over their property during their lifetime, a Will may be preferable and if appropriate, a trust structure may be created through a Will.
- For persons who are willing to part away with ownership while retaining the ability to exercise some level of control, they may consider the option of setting up a revocable trust or setting up an irrevocable trust where they or a private trust company (set up by the family) act as the trustee, etc.
- For persons who are willing to part with ownership and control subject to checks and balances, they may set up an irrevocable trust with an institutional trustee and with terms and conditions they consider appropriate. Institutional trustees often maintain close contract with the settlor to understand the intentions underlying the creation of the trust and exercise their discretion in a balanced manner.
Manner of dispute resolution
- Often there is a preference, both on the part of the family members and on the part of the trustee to resort to arbitration for various reasons, including, confidentiality vis-à-vis family disputes, timely resolution, ability to appoint arbitrators who understand nuances regarding the family and the role played by institutional trustees, etc.
- For trust disputes to be arbitrable in India, a statutory amendment to the Indian Trusts Act appears to be necessary.
- Meanwhile, parties could consider mediation and conciliation of disputes as alternative remedies.
- Stamp duty implications, annual costs of having institutional trustees, etc., also play an important role.
2. Succession law in India
Succession laws in India are diverse and depend on:
- the personal law of the deceased, which in turn is largely based on their religion; and
- the nature of the assets.
Owing to the multiple laws applicable to persons of specific religions, determining the relevant succession regime can be more complicated in India than in other common law countries.
Within this broad regime, succession laws vary depending on whether succession is intestate or testamentary.
'Intestate succession' occurs when the deceased does not leave a will in respect of their assets.
The rules of intestate succession vary based on the personal law applicable to the deceased, which is based on the deceased's religion. For Hindus, Jains, Buddhists and Sikhs, the rules set out in the Hindu Succession Act 1956 (HSA) apply.
For Muslims, the law is uncodified and is based on principles of Sharia, which are further divided into rules applicable to various sects and subsects.
The Indian Succession Act 1925 (ISA) applies to both Christians and Parsis.
- The rules for testamentary succession are significantly less complicated than those for intestate succession. The ISA applies uniformly to wills of persons of all faiths, other than Muslims.
- Therefore, concepts of capacity, formal validity and essential validity of the wills of Hindus, Sikhs, Jains, Buddhists, Christians and Parsis are contained in the ISA.
Uniform civil code
- The endeavour to enact a code which will unify and simplify India's succession laws has been long debated in the Constituent Assembly. There is also a notion that the present framework is too complex and results in inequality.
- The solution proposed is the enactment of a uniform civil code to deal with not only inheritance matters, but also all aspects governed by personal law (eg, marriage, divorce, adoption and guardianship). Therefore, while one is not aware of whether/if the civil code would come into force, this aspect also needs to be borne in mind wherever applicable.