India has so far signed 13 FTAs1, which include the FTAs with Japan, Korea and ASEAN. Agreements with Mauritius, the UAE and Australia have been concluded recently. To examine the impact of FTAs and their changing architecture, and evaluate the benefits, EY brought together domain leaders and policymakers in a virtual roundtable. The panel was moderated by Uday Pimprikar, National Indirect Tax Leader, EY, and the panelists included Ajay Srivastava, former Additional Director General (Foreign Trade); Bipin Menon, Development Commissioner, Noida SEZ; and Agneshwar Sen, Associate Partner, Tax and Economic Policy Group, EY.
The panelists noted that there has been a shift in the architecture of the earlier FTAs with Japan, Korea and ASEAN and the recent FTAs with the UAE, Australia and the one under negotiation with the UK. The UAE and Australian FTAs have created specific opportunities for Indian companies. There are higher expectations from the ongoing negotiations with the UK, the EU and Canada.
The earlier FTAs have been a mixed bag for India. While the outcome with Japan, Korea and ASEAN was balanced overall, with ASEAN, India did not gain much in exports though imports increased. India’s global imports during the 2010-21 period rose by 63%, but imports from ASEAN alone grew about 120%. Exports did not see a similar level of increase mostly due to the fact that countries such as Singapore and Malaysia do not have duty on many products. Therefore, Indian exports where duties are zero did not gain from the FTA route. India’s exports to South Korea increased to double of the global exports after the FTA was signed. However, due to lack of post-FTA outreach initiatives regarding new market opportunities, among other reasons, the benefits did not scale up.
Based on past learnings and changing dynamics of global trade, India’s FTA architecture has changed. While the earlier FTAs focused on eastern countries under the ‘Look East’ policy, the recent FTAs are more focused on Western geographies such as the US, the UK, the EU, and Eurasia. The bulwark of this shift is India’s need to look for supply chain partners that are credible and resilient, while offering investment and access to technology. Given the strong political will and diplomatic ties with these regions, such a change may be win-win.
Another difference is that traditionally, FTAs focused on goods trade and related measures. The new FTAs, however, seek deeper economic integration, reflecting the changing paradigm of international trade agreements. India, through the new agreements, is expressing its understanding of these changes and adopting the imperatives that drive the modern economic trade order.
While the FTAs with Australia and the UAE are a mix of traditional and modern elements, the agreements with the UK and the EU have more modern elements. The agreement with Australia has a two-tier structure in terms of tariff concessions and robust rules of origin, observed the panelists. The UK FTA not only negotiates on tariffs or domestic barriers and services but also talks about sustainability, labor, supply chain resilience, and digital trends like unhindered data flow. The agreements with the UK and the EU will have more than 20 policy areas2.