EY refers to the global organization, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients.
Related content
-
Discover the future of retail and the essential balance between AI innovation and a human-centric approach.
Read more
Retailers already recognize the transformational potential of AI. It is having a broad and deep impact across the enterprise by reshaping cost models, customer relationships, workforces and the competitive landscape. Despite recent geopolitical disruption and macroeconomic uncertainty, AI remains a dominant factor in retail investment strategies. The May 2026 EY CEO Outlook Survey found that 80% of retail leaders planned on increasing their investment in AI in the year ahead, despite clear pressures on cost and price. The survey also demonstrated continued business confidence in the ability of AI to deliver growth, with 80% of retail leaders also expressing optimism in their ability to scale the responsible use of AI and customer data across functions.
But this optimism is tempered with caution. Retail leaders have a tendency toward pragmatism, and AI, like any other technology, could find itself in its own hype cycle. AI investment also comes with both privacy and cyber risk. The shift toward AI and other digital technologies is increasing retail exposure to cybercrime, with the CEO Outlook also finding that 24% of retail leaders identify cybersecurity and data privacy threats as a top risk to their business in the coming year. This creates a paradox for retailers in which the technology most likely to unlock growth may also be the one most likely to expose weaknesses in strategy, governance and operating models.
In planning for the future change that AI will bring, retailers can take a more nuanced approach. Rather than just considering opportunities, or challenges, associated with AI, retailers can consider a range of AI scenarios to build an understanding of where common themes should be addressed to ensure the best path forward.
In anticipating different scenarios, EY teams have looked at AI through the lens of a “four futures” methodology. This approach, developed originally by Jim Dator at the University of Hawaii, applies four radical alternative future scenarios to consider:
- Constraint (discipline or limitations): Economic, social, environmental or political factors restrict growth and hold back progressive development. Legacy systems, lack of right capabilities, silos and poor data quality also limit the ability to scale.
- Growth (continuation or business as usual): The current trends of end-to-end AI investments continue with minimal disruption, leading to progressive advancement.
- Transform (a paradigm shift): A transformational change takes place, leading to a fundamental social and economic reorganization around new values and technologies.
- Collapse (a systemic breakdown): A small number of technology platforms command powerful models and business access is priced at a premium limiting access to fewer larger retailers.
Retailers are already integrating AI into their business infrastructure as they prepare for an agentic future. But the investments they make today may not pay off equally in different scenarios. Winning retailers will be those that can pair technology ambitions with strategic clarity across different outcomes.