Higher government debt-GDP ratios can lead to fiscal stress on account of interest payments, especially if government revenue to GDP ratios are relatively low. This fiscal stress becomes even higher if effective interest rates are relatively high. BRICS+ economies, on average, are subject to higher fiscal stress since their interest payments to revenue receipts ratio at 8.3% in 2025, was higher than the G7 group’s corresponding average at 7.5%. In India’s case, interest payments absorbed about one-quarter of government revenue receipts in 2025, exemplifying its fiscal stress with this ratio being among the highest within the BRICS+ group. This stress squeezes the fiscal space available to governments to undertake counter-cyclical measures, invest in infrastructure, support green transitions and respond to future economic shocks.
BRICS+ institutions
The institutional architecture of BRICS+ has expanded alongside its economic footprint. The New Development Bank (NDB) provides financing for infrastructure and development projects, while the Contingent Reserve Arrangement (CRA) offers liquidity support to member countries during periods of external stress. Together, these mechanisms strengthen resilience and provide alternative avenues for development finance.
BRICS+ has also broadened its focus towards payment and settlement systems as reflected by the proposed BRICS Cross-Border Payments Initiative aimed at facilitating trade and financial transactions in local currencies. Complementary arrangements under discussion also include BRICS Pay, the Decentralized Cross-border Messaging System (DCMS), BRICS CLEAR and other interoperable payment and settlement mechanisms.
Evolving cross-border settlement systems
The growing emphasis on local-currency settlements reflects a broader effort to deepen economic integration within BRICS+. Expanding the use of national currencies and improving payment infrastructure may facilitate trade and investment while reducing dependence on traditional intermediaries.
However, implementation dimensions including interoperability, regulatory coordination, liquidity arrangements, transparency, cybersecurity and broad market acceptance will determine their effectiveness. Their significance lies not in replacing the existing international financial architecture, but in expanding settlement options and supporting a more diversified payments ecosystem for participating economies.