Underlying order management challenges in consumer goods supply chains
Traditionally, organizations have relied on basic principles (such as stock segregation by channel) and rules (such as first-in, first-out of pending orders) to allocate orders in constrained scenarios. However, several challenges make this approach ineffective and limit order execution optimization.
First, in a bid to expand coverage across India, most consumer goods companies have built vast and varied distributor networks. These distributors typically have other businesses competing for the same capital, leading to situations where orders are not backed by adequate working capital at the right time. As a result, constrained stocks either get blocked while awaiting working capital from distributors or get dropped altogether, leading to order execution losses and stock outs in the market. Some large organizations report order execution losses of as high as 30% or more on this account—underscoring the need for AI-based solutions for distributor order optimization.
Secondly, distributor networks often have inadequate data and system controls, resulting in poor real time order visibility for consumer goods companies. Moreover, given their working capital challenges, distributors tend to order only fast-moving SKUs. Organizations therefore end up relying on distributor orders as a proxy for actual demand, leading to poor SKU availability and ineffective inventory optimization.
Thirdly, maintaining high-quality master data is critical to ensure timely and accurate allocation outputs within an order management system. Many organizations still rely on fragmented processes to manage promotions, schemes and fixed allocations. This often leads to repeated manual interventions, frequent CFA requests to amend outbound deliveries and delays that compromise the effectiveness of the allocation engine.
Fourthly, there is significant reliance on third-party logistics providers and market vehicle availability to execute orders. Given last-minute order confirmations and a sharp drop between planned and confirmed orders, transporters are often unable to provide vehicles of the required size or configuration for specific routes on the same day. This results in poor same-day delivery of orders (SDD%). This metric is often overlooked and not tracked by most organizations. However, improving it is critical for improving same day delivery rates in consumer goods, as it can reduce distributor working capital by a full day (a 5% to 10% reduction) while also improving product availability.
Lastly, given real-time changes in orders driven by partial working capital availability, vehicle availability and product availability, organizations often compromise on creating full truck loads. This leads to inefficient logistics movements due to poor vehicle utilization, smaller vehicles or partial truckload movements, limiting logistics optimization and increasing delivered costs.
All these factors contribute to execution losses. While many planning solutions are available in the market, their OMS platform capabilities for real-time decision-making remain limited, forcing organizations to take linear and manual approaches to address these challenges.
For instance, organizations typically engage third-party agencies with large manual teams to capture orders across channels, clean these orders and process them based on predefined static rules on a daily basis. Not being integrated with real-time data or enabled by AI in supply chain execution, these manual processes are sequential and reactive, resulting in inefficient order allocation and execution.