Growth strategy for a Viksit Bharat
As per the country classification of a World Bank report2 (2024), India is presently placed in the lower middle-income group. It is likely to transition to the upper middle-income group in the next few years. As such, it needs to put in place policies that enable its successful transitioning from middle income levels closer to a Viksit status in the next two to two-and-a-half decades.
The report recommends a ‘3-I’ strategy for this purpose: a focus on ‘investment’, then ‘infusion’ of new technology from around the world, followed by in-country ‘innovation’. In this context, India may endeavor to increase its real investment rate to at least 35% from its current levels in the range of 33.4% to 33.7%. It is adept in adopting new technology from around the world. However, a more aggressive technology adoption, especially that of AI and Gen-AI both by the public and private sectors, may facilitate transition beyond the middle-income threshold as India heads towards a developed status. It is the thrust on domestic innovation which needs greater emphasis and requires additional resources for R&D and innovation both by the private and public sectors. Public sector infrastructure that facilitates innovation by individuals and industries also needs to be emphasized. In this context, it is heartening to note that the GoI, on 4 November 2025, launched a Research Development and Innovation (RDI) scheme with a corpus of INR1 lakh crore3. The PLI scheme which already covers 14 sectors may be expanded to cover advanced technology sectors like space and robotics.
Changing contours of the global economy
The economic growth drivers are likely to change in future, affecting growth potential and performance of different countries in significant ways. While there may be several countries with the demographic advantage of a large and young population, there may also be another set of countries whose population accounts for a smaller share of global population and is relatively older. Growth in the latter group of countries may be led by advanced and new technologies including AI and GenAI. Further, in these countries, capital may be abundant while labor may be abundant in the first set of countries. Regulated migration from one group to another might augment global growth and may prove to be ‘welfare improving’ compared to these groups finding solutions in isolation. Since new technologies are by nature labor-saving, there may be unemployment problems across the world. The technology-led countries may need adequately trained manpower and their aged populations may not suit their requirements. The labor abundant countries may also require to suitably educate and train their populations to absorb the new technologies, which may be developed within the country or inducted from abroad.