TaxLegi 29.04.2021

Executive summary

On 31 March 2021, the law (Ν. 41(Ι)/2021, the ‘Law’) amending the Law on Administrative Cooperation in the field of Taxation (Law N. 205(I)/2012) entered into force. The Law transposed the European Union (EU) Directive (referred to as ‘DAC6’ or ‘the Directive’).

The Law entered into effect as of 1 January 2021. However, it will have a retrospective effect for reportable cross-border arrangements concluded on or after 25 June 2018 provided that one of the prerequisite triggering events is met.

The final Cypriot Mandatory Disclosure Rules (‘MDR’) legislation is broadly aligned with the requirements of the Directive with minor deviations, as highlighted below.

Further to the Law, guidance notes (in the form of a Ministerial Decree) will be issued by the Cypriot Tax Department (‘CTD’) in the next few weeks which will provide clarity over the interpretation of key terms of the Law.

 

Detailed discussion

Background

The Council Directive (EU) 2018/822 of 25 May 2018 amending Directive 2011/16/EU regarding the mandatory automatic exchange of information in the field of taxation (the ‘Directive’ or ‘DAC6’), entered into force on 25 June 2018 [1].

The Directive requires intermediaries (including EU-based tax consultants, banks, asset managers, corporate administrative service providers, insurance companies and lawyers) and in some situations, taxpayers, to report certain crossborder arrangements (reportable arrangements) to the relevant EU Member State tax authority. This disclosure regime applies to all taxes except value added tax (VAT), customs duties, excise duties and compulsory social security contributions[2]. Cross-border arrangements will be reportable if they contain certain features (known as hallmarks). The hallmarks cover a broad range of structures and transactions. For more background, see EY Global Tax Alert, Council of the EU reaches an agreement on new mandatory transparency rules for intermediaries and taxpayers, dated 14 March 2018.

 

Scope of taxes covered

The scope of taxes covered under the Law is fully aligned with the Directive and applies to all taxes except VAT, customs duties, excise duties and compulsory social security contributions.

 

Reportable arrangements

Under the Directive, an arrangement is reportable if:

• The arrangement meets the definition of a cross-border arrangement; and
• The arrangement meets at least one of the hallmarks A-E specified in Annex IV of the Directive and the main benefit test (‘MBT’), where applicable.

Under the Directive, “cross-border arrangements” are defined as arrangements concerning more than one EU Member State or an EU Member State and a third country, where an additional “territorial” condition is met.

The definition of “reportable arrangement” included in Article 2 of the Law is aligned with the DAC6 definition.

“Marketable arrangements”, are defined in DAC6 and the Law as “cross-border arrangements that are designed, marketed, ready for implementation or made available for implementation without a need to be substantially customised”.

The hallmarks can be distinguished as hallmarks which are subject to the MBT, and those which by themselves trigger a reporting obligation without being subject to the MBT.

 

Areas of clarification and key highlights:

“EU-nexus” Main benefit test

In accordance with DAC6, the MBT will be satisfied if it can be established that the main benefit or one of the main benefits which, having regard to all relevant facts and circumstances, a person may reasonably expect to derive from an arrangement, is the obtaining of a tax advantage.

The text of the Law links the definition of “tax advantage” with the scope of taxes covered under article 2(1) of the Directive 2011/16/EU[3], thus referring to an “EU-nexus” Main benefit test, i.e., the tax benefit is limited to tax advantages obtained in Cyprus or another EU Member State.

In addition, the definition of “tax advantage” is further defined by reference to the following:

(i) Relief or increased relief from tax;

(ii) Repayment or increased repayment of tax;

(iii) Avoidance or reduction of a charge to tax

or an assessment to tax;

(iv) Deferral of a payment of tax or

advancement of a repayment of tax;

(v) Avoidance of an obligation to withhold tax.

However, the Law does not include any “policy” test or “principles” test in relation to MBT.

 

Intermediaries

Under the Directive, intermediaries with EU nexus have the primary obligation to file information to the tax authorities. DAC6 provides for an exemption from reporting for intermediaries and relevant taxpayers, if sufficient proof of reporting of the same information is provided by the other

intermediary/relevant taxpayer, as well as an exemption from reporting for intermediaries covered under legal professional privilege (‘LPP’). If there are no other qualifying intermediaries (i.e., EU-nexus intermediaries or intermediaries not covered under LPP), the obligation will be shifted to the relevant taxpayer(s). 

 

Legal Professional Privilege (LPP)

It has been further specified in the Law that LPP is only granted to lawyers and law firms that exercise the profession of lawyer in line with Capital 2 of the Advocates Law. However, lawyers who are covered by LPP may be exempt

from reporting to the CTD but should still have an obligation to notify other intermediaries and/or the relevant taxpayer of their reporting obligations within ten (10) days from the date

when the reporting obligation has been created (i.e., from the date of the triggering event for reporting).

 

Reporting deadlines

The reporting deadlines and triggering events provided in the Law are fully aligned with the relevant provisions of DAC6, as amended, given also the 6-month deferral provided in Cyprus due to the COVID-19 pandemic[4], the extension provided by the CTD to the deadlines for DAC6 submissions until 31 March 2021[5] and the non-imposition of administrative fines for DAC6 submissions made up until 30 June 2021[6].

It is worth noting that for the time being, Cyprus has opted not to adopt the provision of the Directive which requires that each relevant taxpayer files information about their use of the

arrangement to the CTD in each of the years for which they use it.

Moreover, the Law includes a provision that does not appear in the Directive, according to which the CTD, for reasons of verifying the compliance of intermediaries and relevant taxpayers with their reporting and notification obligations, can require under written notice, the provision of documents and/or information regarding a specific arrangement within fourteen (14) days from the date of such notice. 

 

Penalties

Breach	Penalty (one-off administrative fine per entity and arrangement)
Failure to report a RCBA	€ 10.000-20.000
Delay in reporting a RCBA	Up to 90 calendar days: € 1.000-5.000
	More than 90 calendar days: € 5.000-20.000
Filing inaccurate or incomplete or misleading report of a RCBA	€ 1.000-10.000
Failure to notify other intermediaries or the relevant taxpayer by the intermediary regarding the exemption due to LPP	€ 10.000-20.000
Delay in the notification of other intermediaries or the relevant taxpayer by the intermediary regarding the exemption due to LPP	Up to 90 calendar days: €1.000-5.000
	More than 90 calendar days: €5.000-20.000
Failure to provide the Cypriot Tax Department with information or documents for an arrangement within 14 days from the date of reception of written notice	€1.000-10.000
Failure to pay the administrative fines imposed/Continuance of the relevant breach	Increase of imposed fine up to €20.000

 

Application to Court

The CTD shall notify the affected intermediary/relevant taxpayer about its intention to impose a penalty and the reasons behind such intention by also providing them with a deadline of fifteen (15) working days from the date of the abovementioned notification in order to submit their written objections.

An intermediary/relevant taxpayer can then appeal against the (enforceable) decision of the CTD (which needs to be written, justified and be communicated to the impacted intermediary or relevant taxpayer) to impose an administrative fine, either through an hierarchical appeal, or an administrative appeal, before the Tax Council or the Cypriot Administrative Courts, respectively.

As implied by the provisions of the Law, penalties will also apply for intermediaries/relevant taxpayers who have breached their reporting or notification obligations, as prescribed in the Law, for the transitional period.

 

Next steps

Complying with the new rules is a challenging exercise. Determining if there is a reportable cross-border arrangement raises complex technical and procedural issues for taxpayers and intermediaries alike. Due to the scale and significance of the rules, taxpayers and intermediaries who have operations in Cyprus should ensure that they have the necessary policies and procedures for logging and reporting tax arrangements so that they are fully prepared for meeting their obligations and relevant deadlines.

A detailed Global Tax Alert is forthcoming that will provide more clarity on the guidance notes to be issued by the CTD.

We may assist you in a collaborative manner to help you identify and manage your obligations under DAC6. This includes:

- Conducting strategy sessions to discuss and identify the impact of DAC6 on your organisation

- Conducting workshops for your executive layer teams

- Providing DAC6 learning programmes for your operational teams

- Assisting with identifying and logging your reportable cross border arrangements by

- Using EY’s proprietary automation solutions (for logging, analysing and reporting of

arrangements)

- Outsourcing the creation and documentation of your reportable arrangements

- Simply helping you understand how these rules apply to your company

 

Reference Notes:

[1] For background on MDR, see EY Global Tax Alert, EU publishes Directive on new mandatory transparency rules for intermediaries and taxpayers, dated 5 June 2018.

[2]  DAC6 sets out a minimum standard. EU Member States can take further measures; for example, (i)

introduce reporting obligations for purely domestic arrangements;(ii) extend the scope of taxes

covered; (iii) bring forward the start date for reporting

[3] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A32011L0016

[4] See EY Global Tax Alert, Cyprus postpones MDR reporting deadlines for six months, dated 5 August 2020.

[5] See CTD’s announcement. ‘DAC6 – Οδηγία του Συμβουλίου της ΕΕ για την υποχρεωτική αποκάλυψη και ανταλλαγή πληροφόρησης για διασυνοριακές ρυθμίσεις’, dated 3 February 2021.

[6]  See CTD’s announcement, ‘DAC6 – Οδηγία του Συμβουλίου της ΕΕ για την υποχρεωτική αποκάλυψη και ανταλλαγή πληροφόρησης για διασυνοριακές ρυθμίσεις’, dated 26 February 2021.

Stavros Karamitros - Assistant Manager, International Tax and Transaction Services

 

We would like to inform you that the Cypriot House of Representatives has voted for an amendment to the Assessment and Collection of Taxes Law which in effect, extends the submission deadline of the Income Tax Return for individuals, the submission deadline of the Employer’s Return and the deadline for the payment of the 2nd instalment of provisional tax for the tax year 2020. The Law was published in the Official Gazette of the Republic on 20 April 2021.

More specifically, the submission deadline for the Income Tax Return of individuals (Form T.D.1) and Employer’s Return (Form T.D.7), for the tax year 2020, is extended to 30 September 2021. The deadline for the payment of any income tax which is due as per Form T.D.1 is also extended to 30 September 2021, without the imposition of any penalties/interest.

Lastly, the deadline for the payment of the 2nd instalment of provisional tax for the tax year 2020 has been extended to 30 September 2021, without the imposition of penalties/ interest.

Our team remains at your disposal for any information and/or clarifications required.

 

Despo Kyrmitsi - Assistant Manager, Direct Tax