1.8. Wealth statement
At present, the Commissioner is empowered to require an individual to submit his wealth statement duly disclosing details of assets held either in his own name or in the name of his spouse, minor children or other dependents.
The proposed amendment would require the Commissioner to request the disclosure of foreign assets, alongside domestic assets in the wealth statement.
1.9. Rate of withholding tax on telephone/internet users
The standard rate of tax withholding applicable to telephone/internet users would remain unchanged (i.e., 15%). However, Bill proposes to enhance the rate to 75% of the amount of bill or sale price of prepaid internet/ telephone card for persons who fail to file required income tax returns (even after issuance of a notice requiring them to file a return of income) and are listed on the income tax general order issued by the Board in this regard.
1.10. Enhanced tax rates for late filers
The Bill proposes separate rates for deduction or collection of advance tax on the sale, purchase or transfer of immovable property for a person who fails to file a return of income and, only upon the sale, purchase or transfer of immovable property, files the return to appear on the ATL to avoid higher rates for non-filers. The proposed rates are higher for these filers than for timely filers, but lower than those for non-filers:
S. No.
| Sale, purchase or transfer of immovable property
| Proposed tax rate
%
|
1
| Where the gross amount of consideration received, or fair market value does not exceed Rs.50m
| 6
|
2
| Where the gross amount of consideration received, or fair market value exceeds Rs.50m but does not exceed Rs.100m
| 7
|
3
| Where the gross amount of consideration received, or fair market value exceeds Rs.100m
| 8
|
This tiered approach aims to maintain the incentive for timely tax compliance while offering a middle ground for those who file late, ensuring they do not benefit from the rates available to compliant taxpayers.
1.11. Enhanced tax rates for non-filers
The Bill proposes to further increase the current rates for tax deduction or collection for individuals who are not on the ATL, as outlined in the Tenth Schedule of the Ordinance, for certain transactions. This initiative aims to heighten the financial impact of noncompliance, thereby encouraging non-filers to file their returns of income and take advantage of reduced tax rates. The increased tax rates for specific transactions, aimed at this category of taxpayers, are specified as:
S. No.
| Description
| Tax rates
|
Proposed
%
| Existing
%
|
1.
| Yield or profit on debt
| 35
| 30
|
2.
| Gross amount of consideration received on sale or transfer of immovable property
| 10
| 6
|
3.
| Gross amount of sale to distributors, dealers or wholesalers other than sale of fertilizer
| 2
| 0.2
|
4.
| Gross amount of sale to retailers
| 2.5
| 1
|
5.
| Purchase or transfer of immovable property:
|
| Where the fair market value does not exceed Rs.50m
| 12
| 10.5
|
| Where the fair market value exceeds Rs.50m but does not exceed Rs.100m
| 16
|
| Where the fair market value exceeds Rs.100m
| 20
|
2. Corporate tax developments
2.1. Exports
The proposed legislation seeks to introduce an extra advance tax of 1% on the proceeds exporters receive from goods they export. This would be on top of the existing 1% tax that foreign exchange dealers or banking companies already deduct on the proceeds from exported goods. Additionally, it appears from the language of proposed amendment that tax deducted (other than additional advance tax collection of 1%) would be considered a minimum tax liability. As a result, income derived from exports would be subject to Normal Tax Regime (NTR).
2.2. Quarterly advance tax
In the event that a taxpayer fails to disclose its turnover or the turnover is unknown, the Bill proposes to authorize the Commissioner to calculate the quarterly advance tax as 120% of the turnover from the latest tax year for which the taxpayer has filed a return, compared to the current rate of 110%.
Additionally, the Commissioner is proposed to have the authority to reject a taxpayer's estimate of advance tax if the supporting documentary evidence is deemed unsatisfactory or if the estimate does not include necessary details as required by law. In such cases, the taxpayer will be required to pay advance tax based on the tax-to-turnover ratio for the latest assessed tax year applied on the turnover of the quarter. The proposed amendment that would give the Commissioner the power to reject the estimate filed by a taxpayers of his advance tax was initially introduced by the Finance Act, 2018, but later repealed by the Finance Act, 2021.
The Bill mandates that taxpayers provide the following details to the Commissioner when calculating the estimate of the tax payable for the quarter:
- Turnover for the completed quarters of the relevant tax year
- Estimated turnover for the remaining quarters
- Documentary evidence supporting the estimated expenses or deductions used in computing income
- Evidence of tax payments and tax credits, along with the computation of the estimated taxable income
The requirement to submit this information could be duplicative, as it is already covered in section 147(6) of the Income Tax Ordinance.
2.3. Taxation of banking companies
- Provision for advances and off-balance sheet items
Specific rules are provided to allow provisions for advances and off-balance sheet items. Presently, bad debts classified as "sub-standard" or "doubtful" under the Prudential Regulations issued by the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP), are not allowable as an expense.
With the adoption of International Financial Reporting Standard 9 — Financial Instruments (IFRS-9), banks are now required to provide for possible future credit losses against advances, off-balance sheet items or any other financial asset classified in Stage I, II or III as performing, under-performing and nonperforming.
The Bill proposes to disregard any provision made in a bank's annual accounts classified as above while working out its taxable income. This will be allowed when the debt pertaining to nonperforming assets is classified as "loss" under the Prudential Regulations issued by the SBP.
The Bill also proposes to disregard any provision or Expected Credit Loss for advances and off-balance-sheet items or any other financial asset under IFRS-9 that existed before or after 1 January 2024.
- Notional gains and losses
Under the law, any adjustment made in the annual accounts on account of application of International Accounting Standards 39 (Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement) and 40 (Investment Property) is to be disregarded when determining a company's taxable income.
Pursuant to adoption of IFRS-9, the Bill now proposes that adjustments made in the annual accounts of a banking company due to any applicable accounting standard, policy, guidelines, or instructions of SBP shall be excluded in computing the taxable income.
The Bill proposes to clarify that super tax shall be leviable on banking companies for the tax year 2023 and for all subsequent tax years.
2.4. Option to obtain exemption certificate withdrawn
The Bill proposes to abolish the concept of issuance of "exemption certificate" for tax withholding from payments to resident persons or nonresident persons having permanent establishment in Pakistan (for sale of goods or execution of contracts). Instead, such persons would be entitled to obtain "reduced rate withholding certificate."
2.5. Deduction of tax on payment against sale of shares of a private company
Under the Finance (Supplementary) Act, 2023, every person acquiring shares of a company, other than a listed company, is required to deduct from the gross amount being paid as consideration for the shares a tax at 10% of the fair market value of the acquired shares.
The Bill seeks to amend this requirement, proposing that withholding of tax is required at the earlier of when consideration is actually paid or upon registration of shares with the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan/SBP. Consequently, it seems that deduction of tax will be required when the shares are registered even if actual payment for the shares has not been made. The Bill also proposes to introduce a penalty equal to 50% of the tax involved, for noncompliance with this withholding tax provisions.
2.6. Advance tax on sales to distributors, dealers and wholesalers
Currently, manufacturers or commercial importers engaged in pharmaceuticals, poultry and animal feed, edible oil and ghee, auto parts, tires, varnishes, chemicals, cosmetics, information technology (IT) equipment, electronics, sugar, cement, iron and steel products, fertilizer, motorcycles, pesticides, cigarettes, glass, textiles, beverages, paint or foam sectors are required to collect advance tax at specified rates at the time of sales to distributors, dealers and wholesalers.
The Bill proposes to expand the scope of this advance tax collection to encompass all items sold by manufacturers or commercial importers to distributors, dealers and wholesalers.
2.7. Advance tax on sales to retailers
Similarly, manufacturers, distributors, dealers, wholesalers or commercial importers operating in pharmaceuticals, poultry and animal feed, edible oil and ghee, auto-parts, tires, varnishes, chemicals, cosmetics, IT equipment electronics, sugar, cement, iron and steel products, motorcycles, pesticides, cigarettes, glass, textile, beverages, paint, or foam sectors are obligated to collect advance tax at specified rates during sales to retailers. Additionally, every distributor or dealer transferring goods to other wholesalers within these sectors is also subject to this requirement.
The Bill proposes to broaden the application of this advance tax collection to include all items sold by manufacturers, distributors, dealers, wholesalers or commercial importers to retailers and distributor or dealer to another dealer, distributor or wholesalers.
2.8. Consequences of not furnishing income tax return for discontinued business
Every person discontinuing a business is required to notify the Commissioner in writing of the discontinuance. Moreover, the business is also required to furnish a return reporting income for the period commencing on the first day of the tax year in which the discontinuance occurred through the date of discontinuance.
If a notice of discontinuance is not filed, and the Commissioner has reasons to believe that the business has been discontinued or is likely to be discontinued, the Commissioner may issue a notice requiring the business to file a return of income for a specified period within the time specified in the notice. Currently, if the business fails to comply with the notice issued as above, no penal action has been prescribed under the law.
The Bill proposes to introduce penalty for nonfiling of return in respect of a discontinued business, pursuant to a notice issued by the Commissioner, which is to be levied at the higher of:
- 0.1% of the tax payable in respect of that tax year for each day of default
- Rs. 1,000 per day of default
The minimum penalty is proposed at Rs.10,000 for individuals and Rs.50,000 in all other cases.
Similarly, the Bill proposes to treat the failure to file a return of income in respect of a discontinued operation, after receiving a notice from the Commissioner, as a prosecutable offence, which could entail a fine or imprisonment for a term not exceeding one year, or both. Any subsequent default may further entail a fine up to Rs.50,000 or imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years, or both. Additionally, the Bill proposes that if the person responsible for the discontinued business fails to furnish his last return of income, the Commissioner may proceed with a best judgement assessment.
2.9. Default surcharge
The Bill proposes to impose a default surcharge at the Karachi Interbank Offered Rate (KIBOR) plus an additional 3% per annum. At present, the surcharge is set at a flat rate of 12%, which is substantially lower than the prevailing interbank rate.
This modification is intended to bring the surcharge in line with the current economic and market conditions, thus creating a deterrent against late payment of taxes.
2.10. Tax appeals system
On 3 May 2024, the Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, 2024 (TLAA) was enacted, bringing significant changes in the appeal procedures provided in the federal tax laws. According to the changes introduced, pecuniary thresholds were prescribed for appeals to be filed against orders passed by the Revenue Officers. For cases concerning income tax, if the "value of assessment of tax" or "refund of tax" in an order passed by a Revenue Officer exceeds Rs.20m, the appeal would lie directly with the Appellate Tribunal. In cases below the Rs.20m threshold, the appeal would be filed before the Commissioner (Appeals). The next forum in both cases would be the High Court.
Due to varied interpretations of these requirements, the Bill proposes the following definitions:
- "Value of assessment of tax" means the net increase in tax liability as a result of the order sought to be assailed.
- "Value of refund" means net reduction in [tax] refund as a result of the order sought to be assailed.
Although the amendments to the appeals procedure took effect from 3 May 2024, all appeals that met the pecuniary threshold of Rs.20m and were pending before the Commissioner (Appeals) were to be transferred to the Appellate Tribunal by 16 June 2024. The Bill proposes to replace this date with 16 September 2024.
The Bill also proposes to clarify that the time limit for filing of appeals in respect of appellate orders passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) or the Appellate Tribunal and served before 3 May 2024 would follow the law in place before promulgation of TLAA.