At many banks, AI projects have been primarily IT-led. A better model involves IT leaders collaborating with their peers in the business to find the best path forward. Collaborations like these have led to some of the most impressive AI deployments we’ve seen in the market. Some banks are using digital twins in treasury services to simulate cash flow scenarios and optimize intraday liquidity. Others have automated the full order-to-cash lifecycle in commercial banking, with AI agents handling credit risk assessment, contract onboarding, invoice generation and collections.
4. Human-centered
Technology alone won’t deliver the AI returns banks are looking for. Skilled AI teams, human-machine collaboration and change management hold the key to success. Training and upskilling efforts will teach workers how to get better at their jobs using AI, especially when they are linked to holistic workforce transformation programs. Furthermore, a collaborative EY/MIT report3 found that more than three‑quarters of executives now view agentic AI as a coworker, a shift that fundamentally changes how workflows and governance models should be designed.
Consider how junior analysts will review initial AI outputs in building deal books, while senior underwriters will validate basic credit decisions made by AI and use AI-driven analytics to find anomalies in loan portfolios. Commercial bankers will use copilots to consolidate customer interaction history, assess the overall risk posture and flag opportunities to boost engagement with individual customers. These human-in-the-loop processes can help mitigate hallucinations and build trust in AI outcomes, beyond simply boosting productivity.
Banks will also create entirely new roles (e.g., prompt engineers, AI workflow designers, bot whisperers and agent wranglers) as AI becomes more prominent across operations. These steps will shorten the path to value and reduce risk along the way. Clear communication, visible leadership and other proven practices for organizational change management can instill an AI-positive mindset within the culture. “The biggest barrier to scaling AI isn’t the algorithm — it’s the change management,” said Gupta. “Training teams, reworking processes and putting in the right governance often takes twice the effort of building the model itself.”
EY and other research offer reasons for optimism. The EY US Agentic AI Workforce Survey (via EY.com US) found that 84% of desk-based employees are enthusiastic about working with AI agents. However, 56% worry about job security, presenting a paradox that banking leaders will have to address.
5. Futuristic and designed for the long term
While there is urgency for banks to accelerate their AI journeys, leaders must recognize the length of the game they are playing with AI and consider how AI (and agentic AI) will reshape the future of banking. This means looking over the horizon and preparing to pivot as technology advances and new capabilities create new possibilities. It’s certainly not too soon to start thinking about how AI will interact with digital assets, tokenization, quantum computing and other next-generation technologies. Again, today’s breakthrough innovations will be tomorrow’s table stakes when it comes to AI.
The long-term planning should be reflected in the design of AI technical infrastructure, with an emphasis on modularity, reusability and scalability. As vendors (from startups to SaaS platforms) mature their AI capabilities, it’s likely that baseline functionality will be embedded in their offerings, removing the need for proprietary development by banks. Though cloud environments are vital, regulated banks are also exploring other options for the most sensitive use cases (e.g., using proprietary large language models in on-premises tech environments). Hybrid approaches like these will likely become more common in the future, as banks seek to balance risk and return, and enable innovation within compliant processes. Banks must also continually evaluate their vendor relationships and be ready to change course as their needs and priorities evolve and new types of solutions emerge.