AI Thesispaper

EY position paper on Artificial Intelligence (AI): AI-generated content in transition – between progress and fatigue


Read in Germanread in French

AI-generated content is changing the way we create and consume content. But how does it influence creativity, quality and authenticity?

Download the EY position paper on AI 2025


In brief

  • AI-generated content is shaping digital communication, but authenticity and creative originality are increasingly under pressure.
  • The implementation of AI improves productivity, but AI content often lacks depth, nuance and genuine human perspectives.
  • The future of AI implementation lies in the collaboration between humans and AI to ensure quality, relevance and innovative approaches.

With the introduction of ChatGPT and the growing accessibility of AI-powered tools, a wave of enthusiasm was sparked, with many believing it marked the beginning of a completely new era. AI-generated content has proven useful in many areas, whether in the automation of corporate communication, the creation of social media posts, or the production of text, images, and videos with minimal human input. However, while expectations – and concerns – were high, the dystopian vision of robots and algorithms taking full control of creative processes has not (yet) materialized.

Experts are observing increasing AI fatigue. The initial excitement is gradually giving way to a more critical reflection on the challenges of AI-generated content. Particularly in digital communication, more voices are pointing out that AI content is often predictable and standardized. But does this mean that we have already passed the peak of excitement? Or are we merely at the beginning of a new phase where collaboration between humans and AI must be redefined?

People are growing tired of AI-generated content

The digital landscape is showing clear signs of AI content exhaustion. On social media, especially platforms like LinkedIn, thought leadership articles, news posts, and corporate communication are increasingly dominated by AI-generated content. These texts are often well-structured, polished, and grammatically flawless – but that is precisely the issue.
 

Many users are noticing that AI content creators rely on predictable phrases and structures. Sentences such as “Let’s delve into…” or “It’s important to note…” frequently appear, making the content feel predictable. While companies are using content creation AI to increase productivity, their messages risk becoming lost in an ocean of generic content.
 

Beyond linguistic standardization, another problem emerges: the human perspective is increasingly absent in generated texts. AI content creators are capable of producing high-quality content, but it often seems sterile and detached from human experience. Readers are increasingly drawn to authentic human perspectives to understand the context and the person behind opinions. This development has led many users to seek alternative sources of information. Interviews, podcasts, and traditional media formats are experiencing a resurgence, as they enable a more authentic engagement with topics. This trend highlights that while AI techniques can efficiently generate content, they cannot replace the human need for genuine insights and individual perspectives.

Corporate data remains a challenge for Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)

While research continues toward developing Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) – a system capable of handling any intellectual task at least as well as humans can – AI still faces significant barriers when it comes to being integrated into companies.

Many organizations hope that the use of AI will enable them to optimize their internal processes.  However, corporate knowledge consists not only of documented information, but also of decades of know-how that often only exists in the minds of experienced employees. Even the most intelligent AI quickly reaches its limits here: the most powerful AI techniques, too, cannot automatically understand contradictory data and chaotic processes or categorize implicit knowledge.

Another major challenge for AI implementation in companies is data protection and regulatory requirements. AI models require large amounts of training data, but sensitive information such as personal data or company secrets cannot simply be fed into neural networks. Once learned, information cannot easily be “forgotten”, leading to potential conflicts with data protection regulations such as the GDPR or the EU AI Act.

Even if AI can analyze enterprise data, the question remains: how do organizations control what information is accessible to which users? Early implementations, such as Microsoft Copilot, demonstrated that inadequately protected data can lead to unwanted disclosure. In some cases, sensitive information, such as employee salary data, was inadvertently disclosed as a result of AI accessing unprotected Excel spreadsheets.

The solution lies in careful and modularized planning of AI implementation. Companies need to create clear structures to ensure that their data is consistent and protected. Rather than a sudden revolution, the integration of artificial intelligence into operational processes is more likely to be a gradual development. The success of this transition will be measured not by how quickly companies can deploy AI systems, but by how effectively they can integrate them into their existing operations while maintaining reliability and trust.

Efficient new AI models will reduce energy consumption

Another critical issue in AI productivity is the immense energy consumption required by modern AI models. Large AI models, such as those developed by leading tech firms, demand enormous computational power, significantly increasing energy consumption. This has led to a growing push for efficient AI models that require fewer resources.

New AI models such as Deepseek, developed in China, show that powerful language models can be trained with a fraction of the previous resources, but can still compete with ChatGPT or Claude in many tasks. This raises the question of whether the need for huge, energy-intensive AI systems could become obsolete in the future.

In fact, it seems that language models based on today’s digitally available knowledge can actually be created more cheaply and efficiently than originally assumed. However, new AI models are currently being trained that not only learn existing knowledge but are also designed to develop new insights and solve unsolved problems, such as in mathematics and physics. Similar to how a scientist spends years developing a new theory, such AI models require large amounts of time, resources and energy.

A promising solution could be to use advanced AI models to train smaller, more energy-efficient AI models. These more compact models could then be used for specific applications without the massive energy consumption of the current leading language models. The success of such low-cost AI models shows that it is not too late for Switzerland to successfully position itself in the race for intelligent AI models and that the barrier to entry for new developments is lower than originally assumed.

While it is not always easy to keep pace with the rapid developments in the field of AI, it makes sense, at least today, to understand AI as a tool that supports us humans in our creativity and decision-making, without trying to give up our authenticity and responsibility to it.

EY position paper on AI 2025

Download the brochure in English, German and French here:

AI Thesispaper

Summary

The initial enthusiasm for AI-generated content is giving way to a more critical view. While AI optimizes processes, humans remain indispensable. Companies must carefully manage AI implementation to maintain quality and authenticity. At the same time, the question of efficient AI models and sustainable use of resources is becoming increasingly important. The key will be to combine automation with human expertise in a targeted way to create real innovation and added value.

Read press release

Related articles

Highlights from the 2024 EY European Financial Services AI Survey

2024 EY survey reveals 90% of EU finance firms adopt AI with plans to up GenAI spend, facing training, ethics, and regulatory challenges ahead.

18 Dec 2024 Roger Spichiger

Risks and benefits of generative AI in the financial sector

FINMA expects the financial industry to mitigate certain AI risks. Get EY’s recommendations across governance, reliability, transparency and non-discrimination.

16 Dec 2024 Darko Stefanoski + 1

EY European AI Barometer 2024

Switzerland is leading the AI transformation as it unfolds in Europe across sectors and countries – but the journey is far from over.

08 Jul 2024 Adrian Ott + 1

    About this article

    You are visiting EY ch (en)
    ch en