EY refers to the global organization, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients.
How EY can help
-
The EY Center for Tax Policy helps businesses assess tax policy impacts, manage risks and prioritize changes to prepare for the future.
Read more
One of the most consequential outcomes of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OB3) was permanence. Several significant business provisions were made permanent, giving businesses a level of tax certainty they have been seeking for years. Yet many business leaders are asking a reasonable question: How permanent is "permanent" in Washington?
On paper, research and development (R&D) expensing, bonus depreciation, interest deductibility under Section 163(j) and key international provisions now have no expiration date. Coupled with the corporate tax rate, which was already permanently lowered, the result is a more stable framework than companies have operated under in recent years. That stability matters. These provisions were designed to encourage investment, innovation and job creation in the United States, and they help companies have greater confidence when making long-term decisions.
Of course, anyone who follows policy knows that no Congress can bind a future Congress. But there are reasons to believe today's framework may prove more durable than many of the temporary provisions businesses have managed for years.
The experience since the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) is part of that story. Before tax reform, policymakers frequently heard concerns about US competitiveness, corporate inversions and the movement of capital and jobs overseas. Many lawmakers viewed the TCJA as a response to those challenges, and supporters pointed to increased domestic investment and business expansion as evidence that the reforms strengthened the US investment environment.