EY helps clients create long-term value for all stakeholders. Enabled by data and technology, our services and solutions provide trust through assurance and help clients transform, grow and operate.
At EY, our purpose is building a better working world. The insights and services we provide help to create long-term value for clients, people and society, and to build trust in the capital markets.
Listen, as he shares key insights into the life sciences dealmaking environment.
EY’s 2026 FirepowerM&A report finds life sciences companies recognizing the need to accelerate their dealmaking strategies to succeed in an increasingly competitive environment. The industry has stepped up its dealmaking activity on multiple fronts:
With US$240 billion of M&A deals signed in 2025, industry dealmaking has visibly picked up the pace after the cautious small-deal focus in 2024.
Though deal volume is slightly down, average deal size has risen as companies prioritize best-in-class innovations that are ready or near-ready for launch.
Companies are racing to capture assets through every channel, with alliance potential deal value also breaking all records in 2025.
This chart shows reflects key deal volume and value data from 2025. Including:
US$240b in life sciences M&A spending in 2025
-12% deal volume drop vs. 2024
+81% M&A value increase vs. 2024
+107% average deal size increase in 2025
While M&A soared in 2025, alliance “biobucks” broke all previous records, with the average deal size leaping 46%. However, since these deals involve only limited upfront investment (around 7% of the total potential alliance deal value in 2025), they involve relatively less risk and resource commitment for the dealmakers.
Alliance biobucks reach a new peak:
2016:
Number of alliance deals: 264
Upfront alliance deal value (US$b):76
Potential alliance deal value (US$b): 5
2017:
Number of alliance deals: 271
Upfront alliance deal value (US$b):67
Potential alliance deal value (US$b): 9
2018:
Number of alliance deals: 310
Upfront alliance deal value (US$b):106
Potential alliance deal value (US$b): 13
2019:
Number of alliance deals: 317
Upfront alliance deal value (US$b):105
Potential alliance deal value (US$b): 15
2020:
Number of alliance deals: 292
Upfront alliance deal value (US$b):161
Potential alliance deal value (US$b): 19
2021:
Number of alliance deals: 282
Upfront alliance deal value (US$b):155
Potential alliance deal value (US$b): 11
2022:
Number of alliance deals: 237
Upfront alliance deal value (US$b):164
Potential alliance deal value (US$b): 9
2023:
Number of alliance deals: 230
Upfront alliance deal value (US$b):167
Potential alliance deal value (US$b): 14
2024:
Number of alliance deals: 245
Upfront alliance deal value (US$b):172
Potential alliance deal value (US$b): 14
2025:
Number of alliance deals: 228
Upfront alliance deal value (US$b):234
Potential alliance deal value (US$b): 17
1
Chapter 1
Why the industry is picking up the dealmaking pace
Major growth gaps loom, and the street doubts life sciences’ leaders ability to replace the revenues at risk.
Life sciences companies are bullish about their own prospects — but the street does not share their conviction. We see a growing disconnect when we compare the guidance issued to investors by companies’ management with analysts’ consensus on the industry future.
Nowhere is this disconnect more glaring than in the area of dealmaking and business development. Over 50% of street forecasts for the top 25 pharmaceutical companies take a neutral to negative stance on the pipeline updates that these leaders have published. More than 40% of analyst discussions skew negative on these companies’ strategic prospects in terms of M&A and partnerships.
This chart shows both the projected growth gap for the top 25 leading biopharma companies as well as the analyst sentiment of those industry leaders.
Growth gap data includes growth gap and estimated sales projections:
2024
Estimated sales: 785.5
2025E:
Estimated sales: 844.92
Growth gap: 21.25
2026E:
Estimated sales: 896.54
Growth gap: 44.91
2027E:
Estimated sales: 942.43
Growth gap: 71.39
2028E:
Estimated sales: 979.18
Growth gap: 112.31
2029E:
Estimated sales: 1007.8
Growth gap: 163.16
2030E:
Estimated sales: 1038.98
Growth gap: 212.13
2031E:
Estimated sales: 1051.98
Growth gap: 281.65
2032E:
Estimated sales: 1043.72
Growth gap: 372.1
Analyst sentiment of industry leaders is:
54% are neutral to negative on pipeline updates
34% are neutral to negative about strategies to address regulatory and trade policies
44% are positive in identifying pursuing strategic BDs, including M&A
2
Chapter 2
Why China is disrupting the M&A agenda
China-based innovation has reached a tipping point in its importance to industry dealmaking strategy.
China-based innovation has reached a tipping point in its importance to industry dealmaking strategy. The total potential value of inbound China alliance investment has increased nearly eleven-fold in five years. In 2025, China captured 34% of the US and European Biopharma industry’s total alliance investment, accounting for more one in every three biobucks the industry spends, including 2025’s biggest-value alliance deal and five of the 10 highest-value alliance deals of the year overall.
The first chart shows number of alliance deals and deal value (US$b) from 2016 to 2025:
2016:
Number of alliance deals: 0
Potential alliance deal value (US$b): 0
2017:
Number of alliance deals: 3
Potential alliance deal value (US$b): 2.5
2018:
Number of alliance deals: 4
Potential alliance deal value (US$b): 1.1
2019:
Number of alliance deals: 3
Potential alliance deal value (US$b): 1.1
2020:
Number of alliance deals: 8
Potential alliance deal value (US$b): 6.5
2021:
Number of alliance deals: 10
Potential alliance deal value (US$b): 11.6
2022:
Number of alliance deals:16
Potential alliance deal value (US$b): 24.4
2023:
Number of alliance deals: 27
Potential alliance deal value (US$b): 34.9
2024:
Number of alliance deals: 36
Potential alliance deal value (US$b): 40.5
2025:
Number of alliance deals: 48
Potential alliance deal value (US$b): 94.3
The second chart shows China’s share of biobucks and alliances:
2016:
All alliances (US$b): 76.4
China alliances (US$b): 0
China share of biobucks: 0%
2017:
All alliances (US$b): 64.5
China alliances (US$b): 2.5
China share of biobucks: 4%
2018:
All alliances (US$b): 104.6
China alliances (US$b): 1.1
China share of biobucks: 1%
2019:
All alliances (US$b): 103.6
China alliances (US$b): 1.1
China share of biobucks: 1%
2020:
All alliances (US$b): 154.9
China alliances (US$b): 6.5
China share of biobucks: 4%
2021:
All alliances (US$b): 143.5
China alliances (US$b): 11.6
China share of biobucks: 7%
2022:
All alliances (US$b): 139.4
China alliances (US$b): 24.4
China share of biobucks: 15%
2023:
All alliances (US$b): 132.2
China alliances (US$b): 34.9
China share of biobucks: 21%
2024:
All alliances (US$b): 131.2
China alliances (US$b): 40.5
China share of biobucks: 24%
2025:
All alliances (US$b): 154.65
China alliances (US$b): 79.29
China share of biobucks: 33.89%
3
Chapter 3
Why companies need to improve their dealmaking efficiency
Dealmaking is critical to value for life sciences companies. But execution needs to keep pace with ambition.
The deals data shows two fundamental realities for life sciences dealmaking.
First, the industry is dependent on deals: companies that sign more deals enjoy higher returns on capital than their less active peers. Companies that are active on both sides of the dealmaking equation — both acquiring and divesting — are more successful than companies that are less engaged across the transactions space.
The chart on the left shows that companies that do deals (7.6%) meet or exceed revenue targets more than companies that do not do deals (3.4%).
The chart on the right shows that only 32% of deals meet expectations, and 86% of that success comes from therapeutic area alignment.
4
Chapter 4
Why the industry should keep accelerating on deals in 2026
Life Sciences companies need deals — and the strategic capabilities, including AI — to achieve deal success.
With a record $2.1 trillion in available Firepower and abundant opportunities the life sciences industry has the capacity to keep accelerating the dealmaking process through 2026 and beyond, despite uncertainties. Companies will increasingly need to put AI at the heart of M&A, as a necessary enabling technology at the center of the process. The successful life sciences company of the future will ultimately emerge as a connector, catalyst, and co-creator, weaving together science, technology, operations, and commercial strategies into a new approach. The future of life sciences will be defined by those who can effectively "BioWeave" together resources and capabilities and survive and thrive in an accelerating life sciences landscape.
This chart shows the accelerators and decelerators for deals in 2026.
Accelerators:
High Firepower; high growth gaps
Strategic ROCE necessity for deals
US$370bn potential growth gap
US$2.1tr in available Firepower
China and opportunities
Fast and affordable R&D
Major TA opportunities
Low biotech VC/IPO – more M&A exits
AI accelerating deals
AI can accelerate market insight
AI tools emerging to optimize deal execution
Decelerators:
Major competition for assets
High competition for assets
Hight premiums for hot targets
Geopolitical complexities
Margin pressure
Pricing uncertainty
Execution challenges remain
Execution difficulties; 68% of deals miss execution
EY Firepower M&A Report 2026
Download the full report to discover how life sciences can move faster on the deals that matter most.
Please fill in your information to gain access to our report.