EY refers to the global organization, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients.
How EY can help
-
EY government and public sector consulting services provide support to transform programs and optimize operations to achieve better outcomes for the public.
Read more
Utilize a store lifecycle management approach to government service centers
In-person interactions could also be enhanced by providing more robust experiences at public service offices. Retailers have found that by conducting market research they can better optimize store locations and create more consumer-centric shopping experiences, enhancing the overall success of a given location while reducing the cost of operations.3 Applying these same concepts to government facilities could increase constituent interactions, improve constituent experiences at locations (e.g., the DMV), and reduce the cost of operating in-person facilities. Meeting the constituent at optimal locations could drive off traffic and lead to positive downstream effects if these locations are also within near proximity to local businesses. Governments could take this approach a step further and provide interactive displays on mobiles devices or kiosk-like locations to streamline customer wait times for services and collect data on constituent interactions to better improve long-term customer satisfaction and automate operations where applicable. For example, Wawa saw accelerated time to delivery by implementing a cloud-based technology infrastructure at their local frontline store locations.4 Streamlining back-office applications to this technology stack allowed for their front-line associates to make real-time decisions regarding customer needs. Service quality accelerated and Wawa was able to offer more services and products at individual store locations. Imagine a future state where government assistance payments, Social Security payments, permits, and voter registration were done at locations within near proximity to each other or at a central location where data is routed back to central offices that provide near-real-time updates to constituents.
Offline payment applications as an alternative
The rise of digital payments has been heavily supported by internet-based technology. Most traditional payment methods like credit cards and mobile wallets typically require an internet connection for the Point-of-Sale (POS) system to process the transaction. In the US, disparities in internet access persist based on geography, income and race. Additionally, recent outages at major payment processors like Square and Fiserv have underscored the need for greater reliability and resilience in digital payment systems, with significant disruptions reported during these incidents.5
Offline and hybrid payments systems provide an alternative means for governments to provide payments processing access for non-digital constituents. In an offline digital payment system, government personnel could transact instantly with constituents in remote areas without requiring an internet connection. Both the payer and government personnel could use physical devices that store funds or records of funds locally, eliminating the need for an internet-connected intermediary. Funds are digitally stored on devices like mobile phones, typically encrypted, and are transferred securely later when the government personnel are in closer proximity to high-speed internet.
Offline payment systems, including both hybrid and fully offline models, could enhance the resiliency and reliability of payment ecosystems, providing an alternative means for payment processing to be completed without internet access disparities hindering transactions. Hybrid systems are particularly useful in mitigating the effects of temporary internet outages, facilitating transactions in remote areas, crowded events, or regions with unstable connectivity. Outages are particularly impactful for governments as access to critical services will significantly hinder constituents. Individuals could see significant delays in mandatory payments due to them, applying for mandatory identification cards, or remaining in compliance with tax payments deadlines, to name a few.6 By providing these services in support of non-digital constituents, governments could build additional resilience in their digital offerings, creating additional downstream benefits as more people switch to the digital ecosystem.
Conclusion
As governments modernize their operations through digital workflows, it’s essential to recognize that a full transition to digital and paperless systems may not serve all constituents equally.7 Many constituents may have limited access to reliable internet, be digitally reluctant, or have other digital accessibility issues. For these community members, digital platforms can feel inaccessible, unfamiliar, or even exclusionary. This white paper does not recommend that governments pause efforts to bridge the digital divide and should continue to make strides in providing digital services to constituents.8 However, as the pace of technology continues to evolve more rapidly, it will be imperative for government to find creative ways to engage their constituents regardless of their digital capabilities. The cost and time for implementing massive infrastructure transformations creates a lag in service availability that governments can bridge using the strategies above to mend the digital cavern.9 Providing equal access to technology guarantees that all constituents, regardless of technological availability, benefit from government services.