EY refers to the global organization, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients.
How EY can help
-
Helping agencies manage human services, Medicaid, public health, behavioral health and other essential services.
Read more
Behavioral health data reflects people at vulnerable moments, not just records in a system. Oregon needed that information handled securely, with consistency and care.
Oregon’s legacy reporting system made that difficult. Disconnected tools complicated reporting for both Medicaid and non-Medicaid services, limited visibility into statewide trends and provider capacity, and slowed the state’s ability to respond to emerging needs. For providers, that fragmentation meant more time spent on reporting data to the state and less time with clients. For people seeking care, it could mean repeating personal information or encountering delays in access to services.
These pressures extend well beyond Oregon. As Ryan Doherty, GPS AI & Data Leader, Ernst & Young LLP (EY US), noted, “Many governments face budget pressures, antiquated systems and critical labor shortages as they struggle with data hygiene, disparate systems and fractured data ecosystems.”
By 2021, Oregon recognized that modernizing its data infrastructure was critical to delivering Medicaid-funded behavioral health services across the state. The Oregon Health Authority (OHA) worked with EY US to design a system that could better support providers and give policymakers clearer insight into statewide behavioral health needs and substance use disorder treatment. That effort led to the Resilience Outcomes Analysis and Data Submission (ROADS) system, which became Oregon’s behavioral health data system of record in March 2025.
From the start, OHA and EY US shaped ROADS with input from providers and state agency staff who understood the limits of the legacy system. That feedback helped reduce duplicative reporting, improve data accuracy and streamline submissions, giving the state a more reliable picture of the care people receive and the outcomes they experience.