Moreover, there is a structural shift for legacy metals like steel and aluminum, with growing demand for low-carbon metals driven by the expansion of energy transition initiatives and the incorporation of low-carbon materials in infrastructure development. Going forward, this demand is poised to grow further as downstream segments move toward sustainable inputs.
Accelerators that will shape the future of MMA in the US:
1. Incentives to grow supply of battery minerals and rare earths amid rising focus on national energy security
The US MMA sector is increasingly recognizing the need to grow the national supply of battery minerals and rare earths, initiated by the launch of the Feasibility of Recovering Rare Earth Elements Program in 2014. The program, renamed the Critical Minerals and Materials Program in 2022, has a comprehensive focus on building a robust supply chain of battery minerals and rare earths through increased R&D efforts and collaboration, private sector investments in innovation and technology, and international exchanges with partner nations.9
In addition, the Trump 2.0 administration is unveiling measures to bolster the growth of the battery minerals and rare earths sector by reducing barriers and amplifying financial support. The new executive order, Immediate Measures to Increase American Mineral Production, invokes the Defense Production Act (DPA) to promote domestic production and processing of diverse minerals. This will come through financial support, giving a higher priority to mining on federal lands and expediting the permitting process. The scope of the order extends beyond the “critical minerals” identified by the USGS to include uranium, copper, potash, gold and other elements; compounds; or materials designated by the National Energy Dominance Council (NEDC), such as coal. The order seeks to financially support new projects through loans and investment funds, while directing agencies to prioritize potential land sites for mineral development and mining.10
2. Promoting initiatives to reduce longer permitting times
The process of obtaining permits has been a major obstacle in advancing new projects. Currently, the country lags in mine development due to the lengthy and complex procedure required to acquire various licenses, necessitating the coordination among multiple government bodies. It takes seven to 10 years to obtain permits in the US, which is significantly longer than in other countries with similar stringent regulations, such as Australia and Canada, where the permitting period is two to three years.11 Under the new executive order, departments and agencies need to accelerate and simplify the permitting process, particularly for projects deemed crucial. Furthermore, these agencies are to join forces in offering recommendations for the proper management of tailings and the disposal of mining waste.12
3. Trade policies to safeguard domestic sector
The US is implementing its America First approach in trade policy to prioritize national security and economic growth. Since 12 March 2025, the Trump 2.0 administration has applied Section 232 tariffs of 25% on imports of steel, aluminum and certain derivative products against all trade partners.13 For certain products, this will be over the tariffs imposed under International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).14 While these tariffs are expected to benefit domestic producers, they may negatively impact domestic consuming industries due to the immediate effect on import volumes. The US relies heavily on imports for non-fuel mineral commodities, with more than 50% of its supply coming from China, Canada and Mexico — for 24, 23 and eight commodities, respectively — between 2019 and 2022.15
4. Robust demand for construction materials
As the national infrastructure garners bipartisan focus, the Trump 2.0 administration is expected to support initiatives aimed at rebuilding and reinvesting in the US infrastructure. The aggregates sector is well positioned to capitalize on the growing demand for construction materials driven by the need to repair and maintain aging infrastructure and the requirement of a robust foundation for the booming manufacturing sector.
In focus: coal at an inflection point
The global energy crisis of 2021 renewed interest in coal, contrasting with growing net-zero ambitions and the COVID-19 economic slowdown. However, developing energy security with alternative fuels is expected to increase across advanced economies. The aggregate coal mine production in the US was down 41% in 2023 compared to 2013 levels. In tandem, national employment levels declined 43%, and the share of coal in the total energy supply for the US declined from 20% to 10% over the same period.16 However, climate-related reversals, coupled with rapid economic growth policies of the Trump 2.0 administration, are expected to increase the longevity of coal by another few years.
US MMA sector at crossroads: talent shortages, regulatory shifts and capital challenges amid a transforming global landscape
Changing regulatory and geopolitical dynamics:
Economic competition and geopolitical rivalry trends, explored in the EY 2025 Geostrategic Outlook, are shaping the market landscape for MMA.17 Anticipated protectionist tariffs on commodity imports into the US are likely to result in reciprocal tariffs from trading partners, thereby raising global trade barriers, including on minerals that the US is entirely reliant upon. Imports account for over 50% of the country’s apparent consumption of 49 non-fuel minerals. Of these, the US is 100% import reliant for 15 commodities, including 12 “critical minerals” as per USGS criteria.18 Moreover, as the global supply of strategic minerals and metals is geographically concentrated, new geo-energy dynamics and uncertainty around the policies of new governments could create new energy powers, drive resource nationalism and prompt further supply chain diversification efforts.
Access to capital as a rising concern:
With the rising demand for minerals, the sector needs significantly more capital to bridge the investment deficit in mine exploration and development. Mining companies in the US are well placed in terms of the availability of funds, with capital raising for 2024 until mid-November increasing 12% over the past five-year annual average.19 Yet, companies must navigate challenging financing and macroeconomic conditions to ensure growth. Moreover, the Trump 2.0 administration’s withdrawal from the Paris Agreement may lead to a loss of foreign investment opportunities directed toward clean energy initiatives. With increasing scrutiny over the availability and management of capital, mining companies should prioritize capital allocation to balance investor expectations against wider stakeholder concerns.
Costs and productivity: